Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-05Last updated on 2026-06-05

Abstract

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

Author: Jae, PANews

Flowing narratives, steadfast Near. From a high-performance public chain and sharding for scalability, to chain abstraction and Intents, and now to the hottest topic of AI Agent, Near has hardly missed any major narrative throughout several past crypto cycles.

Backed by Illia Polosukhin, co-author of the classic Transformer AI paper and hailed as "the one who understands AI best in Web3," Near has delivered surprisingly impressive results even during the bear market. Today, Near is a cross-chain infrastructure giant that has processed over $20 billion in cumulative cross-chain transaction volume and generated over $34 million in fee revenue.

However, few know that Near's birth wasn't born from a grand blockchain ideal, but rather from a somewhat awkward practical dilemma: the inability to pay cross-border salaries. Eight years ago, to solve the problem of paying its global developers, the AI startup co-founded by Illia Polosukhin was forced to pause its AI dream and pivot to building a public chain.

Now, as the AI wave sweeps the globe, this public chain, born from AI and once sidetracked for AI, has returned to where the story began.

Payroll Problem Unexpectedly Gives Birth to a Public Chain, Now Returning to the AI Track

History sometimes comes full circle in a remarkable way. Nine years ago, Illia Polosukhin was not yet one of the crypto founders most associated with AI.

Near was founded in 2017 by Illia Polosukhin, co-author of the Transformer paper and former Google machine learning researcher, and Alexander Skidanov, a distributed systems expert.

Near was initially an artificial intelligence startup focused on the field of "Program Synthesis," essentially "teaching machines to write code" to automate software development. Its concept was similar to later projects like OpenAI's CodeX, Anthropic's Claude Code, and Cursor.

To train algorithms and models, the team recruited computer science students worldwide to remotely write code snippets. However, how to pay developers distributed across the globe became a major hurdle.

Cross-border payment systems at the time were far less mature than today. Mainstream tools like PayPal and Wise faced severe limitations in Eastern Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, plagued by delayed settlements and exchange rate losses. Interestingly, when the two founders tried using early public chains for cross-border payments, they found that high Gas fees and low settlement efficiency made it impossible to distribute payments cost-effectively in batches.

For a resource-limited AI startup, this was almost an unsolvable problem. Ultimately, the two founders, with backgrounds in large-scale distributed systems, made a surprising decision: to shelve AI model development and instead build a highly scalable, low-fee, and user-friendly public chain themselves.

This passive pivot, triggered by the inability to "pay salaries," led to the birth of the "Near Protocol" in 2018.

However, the early transition path was not smooth. After leaving the AI track, Near shifted to developing a high-performance public chain focused on sharding technology to solve blockchain's scalability challenges.

With solid technical prowess, the Near Protocol secured over $500 million in cumulative funding during this period. Yet, in the fierce competition of the public chain arena, Near neither formed a landmark application nor managed to attract large-scale developer adoption. Sparse ecosystem applications, stagnant user growth, and low market attention meant that even with an advanced sharding architecture, Near's attention was often diverted by other hot public chains in the crowded "Ethereum killer" environment. The protocol once fell into a quiet period of "critical acclaim but poor sales."

During the 2020-2021 bull market, Near caught the cross-chain trend, with the launch of the Rainbow Bridge becoming a key catalyst for its ecosystem explosion and token price surge.

The outbreak of the AI boom brought a turning point for Near's destiny. In March 2024, at the GTC global developer conference, NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang invited Illia Polosukhin and six other co-authors of the Transformer paper for a stage discussion.

Jensen Huang praised the paper as having "changed the world," emphasizing that the Transformer architecture is the foundation of all AI industry achievements, reshaping the global technology, content, and financial landscape. This spotlight moment allowed Illia Polosukhin, as a co-creator, and Near, with its interrupted AI dream, to once again attract the crypto market's attention with the legitimate status of "AI lineage."

Returning to the battlefield with a new posture, Near's unique "technical core" was further activated. Seizing this opportunity, the protocol pivoted towards Near Intents and confidential transactions, laying a solid foundation amid the trend of multi-chain intent and Agent Economy convergence.

The intent transaction layer significantly lowered the interaction barrier for AI Agents, enabling Agents like Venice AI deployed in confidential hardware TEEs (Trusted Execution Environments) to autonomously, securely, and cost-effectively transfer funds across multiple chains.

Near Intents Becomes New Growth Line, Amassing $20 Billion in Trading Volume

Near Intents redefines the cross-chain trading experience. In the traditional multi-chain environment, users need to manually operate cross-chain bridges, prepare different Gas tokens on source and destination chains, and constantly watch out for slippage and friction costs for a single cross-chain asset swap.

Near uses an intent mechanism to abstract the entire process. Users only need to express their trading needs, such as "swap BTC on the source chain for ETH on the destination chain," without understanding the cross-chain path and Gas costs. This is the interaction experience ordinary users, and even future AI Agents, seek.

The execution of cross-chain transactions relies on an off-chain Solver network's bidding mechanism.

  • When a user submits an intent request, the Solver network bids via the Solver Bus, automatically finding and calculating the optimal execution route and quote.

  • Once the user signs the quote, the intent is submitted to the Verifier smart contract on the Near chain for final settlement.

Throughout this process, Gas fees are deducted seamlessly in the background, allowing users to pay without noticing, effectively unleashing the vitality of DeFi cross-chain trading. The significant optimization of user experience led to widespread integration of Near by traffic gateways like Ledger.

However, the potential centralization of the Solver network is a significant risk. As solvers require ample liquidity for market-making and complex algorithm optimization, trading APIs like 1Click typically rely on trusted swap aggregators and leading market makers. This could lead to oligopoly in the solver market, weakening the price advantages originally brought by the bidding mechanism.

Data from DeFi Llama shows Near Intents is deployed across 25 public chains, covering the major settlement networks of the crypto market.

The protocol's TVL (Total Value Locked) exceeds $85 million. It not only retains $36.5 million in funds on the Near chain but also establishes deep liquidity on chains like Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Tron through chain abstraction mechanisms. This breadth of the cross-chain ecosystem is key to Near Intents surpassing the $20 billion mark in cumulative trading volume.

From a profitability perspective, since the launch of Near Intents, the protocol has generated over $33 million in fees. More than 70% of this revenue came from the last two quarters. This indicates that as the multi-chain ecosystem continues to expand, the protocol's profitability is also showing a growth trend.

The gradually increasing fee revenue will establish a positive feedback mechanism for NEAR at the economic level. The vast majority of network fees are burned, injecting deflationary pressure into the NEAR token and further enhancing its value capture capability.

Confidential Transactions Swallow 40% of Volume: Growth Engine or Regulatory Hazard?

Currently, as on-chain activity grows, privacy needs are no longer a niche demand in the crypto market, and this has become Near's differentiating advantage.

Since launching "Confidential Intents" and "Confidential Swaps" features in the first quarter of this year, their adoption rate has risen rapidly. Over the past 30 days, the total trading volume on the Near chain was $209 million, with confidential swap volume reaching $87 million, accounting for 41.63%. This data reflects not just product adoption but the genuine existence of market demand.

Behind this business explosion is Near addressing a long-standing structural pain point in the DeFi market: the highly transparent on-chain ledger exposes the positions and intentions of large traders. This leads to severe sandwich attacks (MEV), significant slippage, and strategy leakage when institutions or whales execute large trades.

The Confidential Intents feature, by introducing programmable privacy technology, allows users to seamlessly switch to "confidential mode" on the frontend interface. In this mode: the transaction amount, direction, and position are completely hidden from the outside world during execution, with only verifiable encrypted accounting performed on-chain at settlement.

Bots' sandwich attacks fail, and traders' business secrets are protected. The Confidential Swaps feature will open a relatively safe DeFi channel for institutional capital, reducing trading friction and facilitating the integration of on-chain ecosystems with mainstream finance.

However, the other side of the coin cannot be ignored. A privacy transaction share exceeding 40% proves the existence of real demand but may also attract regulatory scrutiny. Global regulatory pressure on privacy protocols like Tornado Cash has never eased. Anonymous large-scale fund flows are more likely to trigger regulatory enforcement. If regulators deem the "Confidential Swaps" model to pose money laundering risks, Near may inevitably fall under regulatory scrutiny, potentially becoming its biggest future uncertainty.

Looking back on its nine-year journey, Near's growth script shows a highly dramatic trajectory. Despite experiencing public chain competition, market cycles, and narrative shifts, it has continuously adjusted its development direction.

Today, chain abstraction, Intents, and confidential transactions have become Near's new exploration focus. The AI boom has prompted the market to re-examine this public chain's unique background. However, whether these attempts can help Near build a more solid ecosystem moat still requires more time to observe.

Related Questions

QWhat was the original motivation behind the creation of the NEAR blockchain, and what problem was it trying to solve?

AThe NEAR blockchain was created to solve a practical problem: an AI startup founded by Illia Polosukhin and Alexander Skidanov couldn't efficiently pay its globally distributed team of developers due to high costs and inefficiencies in existing cross-border payment systems and early blockchains.

QHow has the NEAR protocol's 'Intents' mechanism improved the user experience for cross-chain transactions?

ANEAR's 'Intents' mechanism abstracts the complexity of cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their desired outcome (e.g., 'swap BTC for ETH'), and a network of solvers automatically finds and executes the optimal route, handling gas fees in the background, making the process seamless and user-friendly.

QWhat is a key risk associated with the solver network that powers the NEAR Intents system?

AA key risk is potential centralization and oligopoly within the solver network. As solvers require significant liquidity and complex algorithms, major market makers and trusted exchange APIs could dominate, potentially undermining the price competition the bidding mechanism is designed to foster.

QWhat does the significant adoption of NEAR's 'Confidential Swaps' feature indicate about the current DeFi market?

AThe high adoption rate of 'Confidential Swaps' (over 40% of recent NEAR transaction volume) indicates a strong and growing market demand for on-chain privacy, particularly among institutional and large traders seeking to protect their strategies from MEV attacks, front-running, and slippage.

QWhat is the potential regulatory challenge highlighted for NEAR's private transaction features?

AThe regulatory challenge is that the high volume of private transactions could attract scrutiny from global financial watchdogs. Regulators may view features like 'Confidential Swaps' as potential tools for money laundering, similar to their stance on other privacy protocols, which could pose a significant future risk for NEAR.

Related Reads

Crossing Boundaries Is Hard: Neither Prediction Market Nor Perp DEX Leader Has Replicated Their Own Success

Over the past six months, two of the hottest trading sectors—prediction markets and Perpetual DEXs (Perp DEXs)—have been attempting to cross into each other's territories. In April, prediction market platform Polymarket announced plans to launch perpetual contracts (Perps) for crypto, stocks, and commodities. In late May, the regulated platform Kalshi launched CFTC-regulated crypto Perps. Meanwhile, leading Perp DEX Hyperliquid moved in the opposite direction, launching its HIP-4 outcome markets for event-based trading in May. Initial results from these crossovers have been mixed, showing that established user habits and liquidity do not easily transfer to new product categories. Hyperliquid's HIP-4 platform saw strong initial demand, with daily volume reaching nearly $30 million during the World Cup, but active markets have since collapsed from over 120 to under 20, with daily volume often falling below $1 million. This highlights the inherent challenge: perpetual contracts maintain liquidity around core assets, while event contracts expire and require constant renewal of interest and liquidity. Similarly, Polymarket's Perps, still in an invite-only phase, saw daily volume drop from an initial ~$48 million to around $18 million by late July, with open interest (OI) at only ~$26.4 million—a fraction of Hyperliquid's ~$7.7 billion OI. Kalshi's Perps had a faster start, accumulating $16.1 billion in volume over six weeks, but recent daily volume has plummeted over 80% to around $80 million, with OI remaining in the millions, far below major Perp DEXs. The article concludes that replicating the deep liquidity and entrenched user behavior of a core market is exceptionally difficult. For these platforms, deepening their dominance in their original "home" sectors—whether Perp DEXs or prediction markets—may be a more viable strategy than pursuing a broad "everything exchange" model through跨界 expansion. Success ultimately depends on sustained accumulation of users, liquidity, and market depth in a core niche.

Odaily星球日报3m ago

Crossing Boundaries Is Hard: Neither Prediction Market Nor Perp DEX Leader Has Replicated Their Own Success

Odaily星球日报3m ago

Google's earnings report is bright enough, so why isn't Wall Street buying it?

Google's parent company, Alphabet, reported strong Q2 2026 results with revenue of $119.8 billion (up 24% YoY) and operating profit of $40.8 billion (up 30% YoY). Its Google Cloud segment was a standout, with revenue surging 82% to $24.77 billion. However, despite these positive figures, the company's stock fell nearly 3% in after-hours trading. The market's negative reaction stems from concerns over the massive costs of competing in the AI era. Alphabet's capital expenditures hit $44.9 billion in Q2, and its full-year 2026 Capex guidance was raised to $195-$205 billion. This intense spending on AI infrastructure (servers, data centers) caused Alphabet's free cash flow to turn negative for the first time, at -$5.855 billion. While Google Cloud's rapid growth demonstrates some return on AI investments, its ~$100 billion annualized revenue is still overshadowed by the nearly $200 billion in annual Capex. Investors are questioning how long it will take for these enormous investments to translate into sustainable, profitable growth. Furthermore, doubts persist about the competitiveness of Google's core Gemini AI model, especially after reported delays. The market is shifting its focus from sheer AI spending to which company can most effectively monetize its investments. For Google, the challenge is to prove its "full-stack AI" strategy can deliver long-term value that justifies the current financial strain.

Odaily星球日报4m ago

Google's earnings report is bright enough, so why isn't Wall Street buying it?

Odaily星球日报4m ago

Data Review: How Much Profit Did Prediction Markets Reap from a Single World Cup?

**How Much Did the 2026 World Cup Boost Prediction Markets? A Data Review.** The 2026 World Cup provided a major, temporary boost to leading prediction markets, according to an analysis of Kalshi, Polymarket, and predict.fun. During the tournament, total nominal trading volume reached $543.38 billion on Kalshi, $209.88 billion on Polymarket, and $10.92 billion on predict.fun. While Kalshi maintained an overall lead, Polymarket narrowed the gap significantly in World Cup-specific markets. All platforms saw daily trading volumes roughly double or more during the event compared to pre-tournament levels, but activity largely retreated to baseline shortly after the final. Fee revenue also surged. Kalshi's weekly fees peaked at over $100 million in the fourth week, totaling $473.2 million for the tournament. Polymarket's weekly fees stabilized around $20 million, totaling $111.4 million. Predict.fun saw its weekly fee income rise from a pre-tournament $159k to a peak of $755k, with a six-week total of $3.48 million. Post-tournament, daily fee income declined for all three. Analysis of Total Value Locked (TVL) showed Polymarket's deposits remained flat around $4.4-$4.8 billion during the World Cup and later fell, suggesting the event spurred high-frequency trading but not long-term capital commitment. In contrast, predict.fun's TVL saw a clear inflow during the tournament's knockout stages, rising to a peak near $25 million before easing. The data confirms that mega-sports events can generate massive, concentrated trading volume and revenue for prediction platforms. However, the post-tournament pullback indicates this growth is largely event-driven and doesn't automatically translate into sustained higher activity. The World Cup validated sports as a core trading category and helped users develop repeated trading habits, setting the stage for the next phase of competition focused on user retention and creating consistent trading demand.

Odaily星球日报9m ago

Data Review: How Much Profit Did Prediction Markets Reap from a Single World Cup?

Odaily星球日报9m ago

South Korean Stock Market Experiences 7 Circuit Breakers This Year: The Summer Ruined by Leverage for Young People

The South Korean stock market experienced an extreme crash and a wave of forced liquidations after a historic rally. In the past month alone, the entire market halted trading four times due to circuit breakers, surpassing records set during the 2008 financial crisis. The KOSPI index plummeted 32% from its peak, triggering widespread deleveraging. Over 1.2 million leveraged retail accounts faced margin calls, with hundreds of thousands fully liquidated, erasing trillions of won in investor deposits. The article details the human cost through several stories. A celebrity lamented buying SK Hynix at a peak. A 24-year-old army veteran lost his entire 200 million won savings and 2.8 billion won in paper gains after a highly leveraged bet on a single stock. In a tragic incident, a disgruntled follower of a YouTube stock influencer stabbed the博主 after following his advice led to massive losses. Even a seasoned investor saw 1.5 billion won vanish in two months. Despite the carnage, new retail investors continue to enter the market, often driven by FOMO (fear of missing out) and the perception that cash is a "waste" during a bull run. This speculative frenzy is partly attributed to President Lee Myung-bak's administration, which promoted stock market reforms to shift reliance from real estate and vowed to boost the KOSPI. However, soaring property prices have also pushed young Koreans toward high-risk, leveraged stock investing as their only perceived path to wealth accumulation. The report concludes that while the market's future is uncertain, this cycle of policy-driven booms, leveraged speculation, and devastating busts is a recurring phenomenon in financial history, with Korean youth being its latest participants.

Odaily星球日报12m ago

South Korean Stock Market Experiences 7 Circuit Breakers This Year: The Summer Ruined by Leverage for Young People

Odaily星球日报12m ago

Hot Interaction Compilation | AllScale Points Tasks; Skew Waitlist Application (July 22)

**Summary: Hot Interaction Roundup – AllScale Point Tasks & Skew Waitlist Application (July 22nd)** This article from Odaily introduces three crypto projects with current user interaction opportunities. **1. AllScale: Self-Custody Stablecoin Digital Bank** AllScale is a non-custodial fintech platform enabling instant, low-cost cross-border payments with stablecoins like USDT/USDC. It recently secured a $5 million seed round. Users can earn points by: visiting the official website, creating an account, verifying their email (100 pts), completing a 7-day consecutive login streak (300 pts), and finishing the first "invoice receipt" task (400 pts). **2. Skew: Building "Next-Generation Markets" on Hyperliquid** Skew is an early-stage project focused on creating new markets on the Hyperliquid chain, recently receiving $33 million in funding from Hyperion. Interaction is simple: visit the Skew website and submit your X (Twitter) email, X handle, and Telegram username to join the early access waitlist. **3. GIWA Chain: Upbit's Ethereum L2** GIWA Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 solution by South Korean exchange Upbit, currently on public testnet. The interaction guide involves: adding the GIWA test network to your wallet, claiming testnet ETH via the official faucet (requires idle mining) or a cross-chain bridge, and creating a personal "Up ID" to perform verification and token transactions on the testnet.

Odaily星球日报13m ago

Hot Interaction Compilation | AllScale Points Tasks; Skew Waitlist Application (July 22)

Odaily星球日报13m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片