World Cup Kicks Off, Spotlight on 'Big Wins' and 'Major Losses' in Prediction Markets

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-06-18Last updated on 2026-06-18

Abstract

"The World Cup has begun, showcasing dramatic gains and losses in prediction markets. With the 2026 FIFA World Cup expected to generate up to $10 billion in consumer betting volume, platforms like Polymarket have seen explosive activity. The article highlights several high-profile traders. One user (@mintblade) achieved a 100% win rate across four bets, earning $9.24 million in a single day, including a $7.34 million profit from correctly predicting Iran would not win against New Zealand. Another new wallet (@Fishalive) turned a $4.22 million bet on Spain not winning against Cape Verde into $13.28 million, a 1000%+ return after a shocking draw. Other successful traders include @LEEEROYJENKINS with $5.2 million in profits and @endlessFate, who turned early losses into over $7.85 million in weekly gains. However, significant losses also occurred. User @betoor619 lost nearly $1 million after a heavily favored Spain failed to defeat Cape Verde. Another user, @weatherman12, lost over $1.81 million betting against Argentina, which won 3-0 with a Lionel Messi hat-trick. The report serves as a reminder of the high volatility and risk in sports prediction markets, where unexpected outcomes are common."

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser2010 )

The World Cup officially begins, bringing exponential growth opportunities in trading volume for prediction markets.

According to a report from asset management giant Bernstein, the 2026 FIFA World Cup is expected to generate up to $10 billion in consumer trading volume and over $3 billion in incremental funds for sports betting and prediction markets. Previously, various prediction markets and exchanges have launched incentive campaigns aiming to leverage this event to boost attention and trading volume. With the kickoff of the group stage, scripts such as favored teams losing to underdogs, weaker teams holding strong sides to draws, and dark horse upsets have unfolded one after another. Players in the prediction markets have also experienced their own moments of "striking it rich" and "suffering massive losses." (Recommended reading: "World Cup Prediction Battle Begins, How Are Major Exchanges Competing for This Wave of Event Traffic?" and "The World Cup's Second Scene: Inside the Prediction Markets.")

Odaily Planet Daily reminds readers that sports event prediction markets are highly prone to various upsets; caution is advised when copying trades.

World Cup Profit Representative Accounts: 4 Wins in 4 Bets, New Account Profits Nearly $10 Million

First, let's look at the profit leaderboard, which includes newly created wallets that have won nearly ten million dollars in profit with their first moves. While it raises suspicions of insider information, one can't help but marvel: "The ball is round; anything can happen on the World Cup stage."

First Contestant: 4 Wins, Profiting $9.24 Million in a Single Day

Yesterday, a smart-money wallet (@mintblade) earned $9.24 million in profit from World Cup match predictions within a day, winning all 4 predictions it participated in, achieving a 100% win rate. In the match between Iran and New Zealand, this participant invested $7.03 million predicting "Iran will not win" and earned $7.34 million from that single prediction. It is worth noting that this user ranks first on Polymarket's weekly and monthly profit leaderboards.

Profile link: https://polymarket.com/zh/@mintblade

Second Contestant: First Bet Profits $9.06 Million, Biggest Winner from Spain's Upset Draw

In the early hours of the 16th, the match between Spain and Cape Verde ended in a surprising draw. A new wallet (@Fishalive) spent $4.22 million on Polymarket predicting "Spain will not win the match" and "Cape Verde to win with a -2.5 handicap." Ultimately, the $4.22 million grew to $13.28 million, resulting in a $9.06 million profit.

It is worth noting that they bought approximately 4.7 million shares of "Spain will not win" at an average price of 9 cents probability. After the match concluded and settled at 100 cents, this single trade yielded a profit of about $4.31 million, representing a return of over 1000%. This user ranks second on Polymarket's weekly and monthly profit leaderboards with a $9.06 million profit.

Profile link: https://polymarket.com/zh/@fishalive

Third Contestant: 2 Trades, $5.2 Million Profit

On the 15th, Polymarket user @LEEEROYJENKINS invested a total of $4.73 million predicting "Turkey will not win" and "Australia with a handicap of 1.5." Both trades were successful, resulting in a final profit of $5.2 million. In a single trade, this user achieved a 128% profit rate.

It is worth noting that, although their single highest profit reached $4.8 million, their overall trading history still shows nearly $2.58 million in losses.

Profile link: https://polymarket.com/zh/0x99aea8f9a64d0142b6b66a4b9d02a2211d45386f

Fourth Contestant: Rank 3 on Polymarket Profit Leaderboard, Over $7.85 Million Profit in Past Week

Polymarket user @endlessFate profited $4.7 million in the past week. Previously, in the match between Saudi Arabia and Uruguay, they boldly invested $2.48 million, predicting "draw," "Uruguay will not win," and "Saudi Arabia with a handicap of 1.5," ultimately earning a $5.67 million profit. In the "Australia vs. Turkey" match, they predicted "Australia with a handicap of 1.5."

In the currently ongoing match "Colombia vs. Uzbekistan," they invested nearly $7.5 million predicting "Colombia to win," currently profiting over $2.05 million. Currently, they rank third on Polymarket's weekly profit leaderboard with over $7.85 million in profit. Another noteworthy point is that this user started participating in predictions on Polymarket in April this year, with overall profits exceeding $6 million, despite multiple previous prediction losses.

Profile link: https://polymarket.com/zh/@endlessfate

Current prediction for "Colombia VS Uzbekistan"

Account's weekly profit/loss performance

For more weekly profit accounts, please refer to the official leaderboard: https://polymarket.com/zh/leaderboard/overall/weekly/profit.

World Cup Loss Representative Accounts: $1 Million Loss from Upset, Over $1.8 Million Lost Betting Against Argentina

In prediction markets, for every winner, there is a loser. The opposing side always exists, just in a different identity and form.

Spain VS Cape Verde: 0:0 Draw Causes Single Account Loss of $1 Million

Polymarket data shows that account @betoor619 (address: 0x70088c990ffae782c699b9250f5aa6cbe4e3c666) bought "Spain to win" in the World Cup group stage match Spain vs. Cape Verde. The match ended 0:0, resulting in a $999,000 loss for this user.

It is worth noting that this user bought in at the 92-cent mark, meaning they risked $1 million in principal for an $85,000 potential profit—a seemingly sure-win trade. Ultimately, it resulted in a loss due to the stunning draw, credited to Cape Verde's 40-year-old goalkeeper's seven incredible saves and the team's exceptionally strong defense.

Profile link: https://polymarket.com/zh/@betoor619?tab=activity

Lost the watermelon and didn't get the sesame either

Messi Scores Hat-Trick, Argentina Defeats Algeria, Single Trade Loss Exceeds $1.8 Million

On the 17th, before the start of the World Cup match Argentina vs. Algeria, prediction market whale weatherman12 invested $1.81 million predicting "Argentina will not win" and "Algeria +1.5." If Argentina had drawn or lost, these two bets would have profited $2.65 million.

However, in the end, the Argentine team, led by Messi's "hat-trick" of three goals, successfully defeated Algeria, with the match ending "3:0." Consequently, all the funds invested by this user were lost.

Profile link: https://polymarket.com/zh/@weatherman12

Odaily Planet Daily will continue to monitor World Cup match-related predictions on prediction market platforms. Welcome to join the Odaily Prophet channel.

Related Questions

QWhat is the potential consumer trading volume estimated for the 2026 FIFA World Cup in sports betting and prediction markets according to Bernstein's report?

AAccording to Bernstein's report, the 2026 FIFA World Cup is estimated to bring up to $10 billion in consumer trading volume and over $3 billion in incremental funds to sports betting and prediction markets.

QWhich platform's users are highlighted in the article for their significant profits and losses on World Cup predictions?

AThe article highlights users on the Polymarket platform for their significant profits and losses on World Cup predictions.

QHow much profit did the user '@mintblade' reportedly make in a single day from World Cup predictions, and what was their success rate?

AThe user '@mintblade' reportedly made a profit of $9.24 million in a single day from World Cup predictions, with a 100% success rate on their four predictions.

QIn the match between Spain and Cape Verde, what bet did the user '@betoor619' make that resulted in a loss of nearly $1 million?

AIn the match between Spain and Cape Verde, the user '@betoor619' bet on Spain to win. The match ended in a 0-0 draw, resulting in a loss of $999,000 for the user.

QWhat was the outcome and financial result for the user '@weatherman12' after their bet on the Argentina vs. Algeria match?

AThe user '@weatherman12' bet over $1.81 million that Argentina would not win and that Algeria would have a +1.5 handicap. Argentina won 3-0, resulting in the user losing their entire investment.

Related Reads

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

Gate Research Institute: Chart Pattern Analysis and Breakout Trading Strategies Chart patterns are crucial tools in technical analysis for observing market supply and demand shifts, trend continuations, and reversals. This analysis involves a comprehensive evaluation of trend, volume, support/resistance, time cycles, and breakout validity, not just rote pattern recognition. Patterns are broadly categorized into reversal patterns (e.g., Double Tops/Bottoms, Head and Shoulders) and continuation patterns (e.g., Flags, Triangles, Rectangles). An effective breakout, key for trading, requires clear support/resistance, prolonged consolidation, a prevailing trend backdrop, and volume confirmation. However, breakouts are not guaranteed, as false breakouts are common. Risk must be managed through position sizing, stop-loss orders, pullback confirmations, and profit-taking in stages. Key pattern types discussed include: * **Rectangle Patterns:** Indicate market indecision within parallel support and resistance, with breakouts projecting a move equal to the pattern's width. * **Flag & Pennant Patterns:** Short-term continuation patterns following sharp price moves ("flagpoles"). * **Triangle Patterns:** Symmetrical, Ascending (bullish bias), and Descending (bearish bias) triangles, representing consolidation before a directional move. * **Head and Shoulders Patterns:** Major reversal patterns signaling trend exhaustion. The article details breakout trading strategies, defining valid breakouts by price closing beyond a key level with increased volume and minimal immediate re-entry into the prior range. It contrasts range trading with breakout trading and outlines entry methods (immediate entry, pullback entry, scaling in), stop-loss placement (based on pattern failure), and profit-taking techniques (target-based, structure-based, trend-following). It further classifies breakout outcomes: 1. **Valid Breakouts:** Strong, sustained moves in the breakout direction. 2. **Pullback Breakouts:** Price breaks out, retests the breakout level as support/resistance, then resumes the trend—offering a lower-risk entry. 3. **False Breakouts:** Price briefly breaches a level but quickly reverses back into the prior range, a common risk managed by strict stop-losses. Key validation tools for breakouts include volume analysis, the principle of support/resistance role reversal, and momentum indicators like ATR, Moving Averages, Bollinger Bands, and RSI. In conclusion, while chart patterns and breakout analysis provide a structured framework, their effectiveness relies on multiple confirming factors—trend context, volume, and proper risk management. They should be integrated into a broader trading system rather than used as standalone signals.

marsbit18m ago

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

marsbit18m ago

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

In a speech titled "The Industrialization of Trust," Sharplink CEO Joseph Chalom (former BlackRock digital assets head) discussed the future transformation of global finance. Drawing from 20 years at BlackRock, where he led the launch of Bitcoin/ETH ETFs and tokenized funds, Chalom highlighted the immense hidden costs of establishing trust in traditional finance—estimated at over $9.3 trillion annually in the US alone due to fragmented systems, multi-day settlements, and countless reconciliations. He argued that Ethereum is emerging as the global financial "settlement layer for trust," with its robust, decentralized infrastructure securing over $300 billion in on-chain assets and most stablecoins and tokenized assets. The future, he stated, will be driven by three accelerating pillars: stablecoins (evolving beyond crypto gateways to become efficient cross-border payment rails), tokenized assets (enabling 24/7 trading and reshaping capital markets), and DeFi (providing automated, accessible financial services). A potential game-changer, Chalom added, is the fourth pillar: "Agentic Finance," where AI agents autonomously execute programmable financial transactions via smart contracts and stablecoins. He envisions individuals soon having AI-powered "CFOs in their pockets" to optimize idle capital and manage tokenized portfolios. This shift, facilitated by Ethereum's trustless settlement, could multiply on-chain transaction volume 1000x within a year, moving finance toward a seamless, digitized future.

marsbit18m ago

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

marsbit18m ago

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

The article analyzes the recent significant de-pegging of Strategy's perpetual preferred stock, STRC, whose price fell to approximately $89, far below its $100 face value. This discount has pushed its simple yield to around 12.9%, creating a paradox. The stock was designed as a high-yield instrument trading near par, and Strategy maintains an 11.5% annual dividend, even recently switching to semi-monthly payments to support the price. The author explores several reasons why the high yield hasn't attracted enough buying pressure to restore the par value. A key factor is potential reverse deleveraging from carry trades, where leveraged investors may be forced to sell due to margin calls as the price falls, creating a self-reinforcing downward spiral. Additionally, the tokenization and integration of STRC into DeFi protocols (like Apyx, Saturn, Pendle) have introduced faster, more transparent, and potentially more volatile price adjustment mechanisms through leverage and yield-splitting products. The emergence of a competing product, Strive's SATA, offering a 13% yield with daily dividends, has also changed the yield benchmark, challenging STRC's unique high-yield narrative. Furthermore, the market is questioning the distinction between Strategy's substantial Bitcoin reserves, which provide long-term balance sheet coverage, and the certainty of stable near-term cash flow for dividends. Ultimately, the price dip represents a stress test for this type of BTC-backed, high-yield financing tool. The future path of STRC depends on whether Strategy acts to reinforce the $100 peg (e.g., by adjusting dividends), whether DeFi-related leverage unwinds further, and how investors ultimately price the risks of leverage, competition, and cash flow uncertainty against the offered yield.

marsbit29m ago

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

marsbit29m ago

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

The LIT token of decentralized perpetual exchange Lighter surged to a six-month high above $1.90 on June 18th, with a market cap of $425 million. After a price correction earlier this year, the recent rebound is attributed to its core "buyback flywheel" mechanism. All protocol fee revenue is used for programmatic, hourly market buybacks of LIT. Since its TGE in December 2025, approximately 15 million LIT (6% of circulating supply) has been repurchased for around $21 million. Additional price support comes from the LLP (Lighter Liquidity Pool), where providers must stake LIT worth 10% of their deposited USDC, locking significant token supply. However, challenges persist. Trading volume has declined amidst a sluggish market, with total volume at $1.68 trillion, significantly lower than leading competitor Hyperliquid's $4.37 trillion. While Lighter focuses on perpetual contracts, RWA, and Pre-IPO markets, Hyperliquid has expanded into prediction markets and boasts a U.S. spot ETF, attracting institutional investment and influencer endorsements like from Arthur Hayes. In contrast, LIT currently lacks similar high-profile backing. With 75% of LIT's total 1 billion supply still locked (team and investor tokens begin a 3-year linear unlock in December 2026), there is no immediate unlock selling pressure. The token's future performance hinges on sustaining trading volume growth, successful product iteration, and executing its transparent buyback strategy against a dominant competitor.

Foresight News49m ago

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

Foresight News49m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片