Semiconductors up 78% annually, software down 12% annually: The 'Liquidity Siphon' is playing out within tech stocks

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-26Last updated on 2026-05-26

Abstract

Semiconductor ETFs like SOXX have surged 78.5% year-to-date, while software ETFs like IGV have dropped 12.5%, creating a record performance gap exceeding 90 percentage points. This reflects a major "liquidity suction" within tech stocks, with capital flooding into semiconductors as software faces selling pressure. Driving the semiconductor boom are staggering capital expenditure plans from hyperscalers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta, whose combined 2026 capex is projected near $700 billion. This fuels demand for chips, with companies like SanDisk (up 426%), Intel (up 222%), and Micron (up 154%) leading the S&P 500. In contrast, major software firms like Microsoft, Adobe, and Salesforce are all down over 17% year-to-date. The software sector faces a dual challenge: capital is being redirected to semiconductors, and the rise of AI agents like Claude Code threatens traditional SaaS business models, triggering a narrative of AI displacement. Key unanswered questions remain: How long can hyperscalers sustain their massive capex, given potential free cash flow pressures? And will capital eventually rotate back into the deeply oversold software sector? While some analysts warn of a potential semiconductor bubble akin to the dot-com era, the sector's powerful momentum continues, making market timing exceptionally difficult.

Author: Claude, Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: The Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has surged 78.5% year-to-date, while the Software ETF (IGV) has fallen 12.5% over the same period, creating a performance gap of over 90 percentage points, a historically extreme level.

SanDisk leads the S&P 500 with a 426% annual gain, Intel has tripled, Micron is up 154%, while Microsoft, Adobe, and Salesforce have all dropped more than 17% year-to-date. The four hyperscale compute companies' combined capital expenditures for 2026 are nearing $700 billion. Capital is pouring into the chip supply chain like a black hole, while the software sector faces a double squeeze from AI displacement narratives and fund outflows.

Recently, a hot post on the Reddit investment forum overseas stated that semiconductor stocks are "basically a black hole sucking everything else in," which resonated widely.

Data confirms this intuition. As of the May 22nd close, the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has returned 78.5% year-to-date, while the iShares Expanded Tech-Software ETF (IGV) has returned -12.5%. Two ETFs belonging to the same broad technology category show a year-to-date performance gap exceeding 90 percentage points.

According to Tickeron statistics, all software stocks in the S&P 500 are currently trading below their 200-day moving averages, while about 89% of semiconductor stocks remain above their 200-day moving averages. Both sectors fell in sync to the zero line during the 2022 bear market, after which their trajectories completely diverged. This split was not gradual but explosive.

SanDisk up 426% leads S&P 500, Intel's triple gain crushes AMD

The numbers are even more dramatic at the individual stock level.

According to Benzinga Pro data, SanDisk (SNDK) has risen about 426% year-to-date, making it the best-performing stock in the S&P 500 in 2026, following a 559% surge in 2025. This storage chip company, spun off from Western Digital, has seen NAND flash prices rise over 200% year-over-year driven by AI, with March quarter revenue growing 250% to $5.95 billion and non-GAAP gross margins reaching a high 78.4%.

According to 24/7 Wall Street, Intel (INTC) has risen about 222% year-to-date to $225, doubling AMD's gain. Intel's rebound comes from an extremely low base, coupled with progress on its 18A process node, rumors of Apple foundry orders, and yield improvement data disclosed by CEO Patrick Gelsinger in a CNBC interview. Short sellers have been severely squeezed; according to S3 Partners data, since the March 30th low point, Intel's market cap has increased over $440 billion, resulting in paper losses exceeding $12 billion for short sellers.

Micron (MU) has risen about 154% year-to-date, with a cumulative gain of 661% over the past 12 months. Earnings support this move; for the fiscal 2026 second quarter, revenue was $23.9 billion, up 196% year-over-year, with adjusted earnings per share of $12.20, far exceeding market expectations of $9.21. DRAM accounted for 79% of total revenue, with High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) being a key driver. SK Hynix Chairman Chey Tae-won even predicted that the memory chip shortage could last until 2030.

In contrast, NVIDIA (NVDA), the true "money printer" of AI compute, has risen about 8% to $15 year-to-date, performing far worse than the aforementioned second-tier semiconductor companies. According to The Motley Fool, NVIDIA's current forward P/E ratio is about 21.5x, almost on par with the S&P 500's 20.3x. This means the market is no longer paying a growth premium for NVIDIA; capital is instead flowing towards chip companies with lower valuations and greater potential upside.

$700 Billion in Capex: The Hyperscale Compute Companies' 'Arms Race'

Behind the semiconductor surge is real money.

According to data compiled by the Financial Times and multiple institutions, the combined capital expenditures for 2026 by the four hyperscale compute companies—Microsoft, Alphabet (Google's parent), Amazon, and Meta—are projected to be between $650 billion and $725 billion, nearly doubling from about $410 billion in 2025. This represents the largest concentrated infrastructure investment cycle in tech history.

According to Tom's Hardware, Jefferies analyst Brent Thill stated bluntly: "The AI economy is healthy. The bear thesis is garbage."

Specifically: Amazon leads with a single-quarter capex of $44.2 billion, with AWS growing 28%; Alphabet's Q1 capex was $35.67 billion, doubling year-over-year, with Google Cloud backlog jumping above $460 billion; Microsoft's calendar 2026 capex is projected at $190 billion, with about $25 billion attributed to price increases in memory chips and components; Meta raised its full-year capex guidance to $125-$145 billion.

According to statistics from Om Malik's blog, three of the hyperscale compute companies recorded significant non-cash investment gains in their Q1 earnings: Alphabet recorded $36.8 billion (primarily from Anthropic equity appreciation), Amazon recorded $16.8 billion, and Microsoft recorded $5.9 billion (from OpenAI). While capital expenditures are burning cash fiercely, the AI investment targets themselves are also appreciating.

Software Stocks Slaughtered by AI Displacement Narrative, IGV Posts Worst Drop Since 2008

The other side of the coin is the brutal collapse of software stocks.

According to The Motley Fool, after Anthropic released Claude Code in early 2026, the software sector experienced a sharp decline—the market's logic was not to reward AI innovation but to punish those SaaS companies potentially displaced by AI. IGV recorded its largest drop since 2008 at one point.

As of late May, Microsoft is down about 17% year-to-date, Adobe down about 32%, Salesforce down about 31%, and Shopify down about 26%. The S&P 500 Software & Services Index is about 21% below its 200-day moving average, the largest such deviation since June 2022. According to Goldman Sachs and other institutional data, short positions in mid-to-large software companies have surged sharply over the past three months, with cybersecurity and SaaS companies being the most heavily targeted areas for shorts.

Two layers of logic underlie this divergence. The first is direct capital siphoning: market liquidity is finite. When $700 billion in capex pushes chip stocks into parabolic moves, capital must be withdrawn from somewhere. As the author of that Reddit post said: "Fundamentally decent software companies just sit there or bleed slowly, while the semiconductor index goes vertical."

The second is a revaluation of the narrative. The rapid evolution of AI agents is prompting the market to re-evaluate the moats of SaaS business models: when AI can automate programming, form-filling, and customer service, how long can subscription models based on per-seat fees last? The Motley Fool points out that software companies likely to survive will need features like real data, proprietary workflows, and deep customer integration that are difficult for AI to replicate.

Cycle Peak or Structural Shift? Two Key Questions Remain Unanswered

That Reddit user ended the post with two questions, representing investors' ultimate doubts about whether the semiconductor rally can persist.

However, these two questions remain unanswered.

First: How long can the hyperscale compute companies' capital expenditures be sustained?

According to CNBC, Pivotal Research projects Alphabet's 2026 free cash flow will plunge nearly 90% from $73.3 billion in 2025 to $8.2 billion. Of Microsoft's $190 billion annual capex, $25 billion is consumed just by price increases in memory chips and components. These companies are betting future profits on AI revenue that has not yet fully materialized.

Second: Is software the next rotation target?

According to Bank of America's Chief Investment Officer Hartnett's previous judgment in the Flow Show report, software is one of the best contrarian long positions for Q2 2026, given the extreme deviation of the sector relative to its 50-day and 200-day moving averages.

However, this does not mean the semiconductor rally is over. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) recorded a historic streak of 18 consecutive daily gains on April 25th, rising about 45% during that period. According to Intellectia analysis, some veteran analysts are beginning to compare the current move to the 1999-2000 internet bubble, warning of a potential 25% to 30% correction. But SOX has been up in 22 of the past 23 trading days, setting 15 intraday record highs; this momentum is itself a signal.

As that Reddit user said: "I don't want to call a top because I've been slapped in the face too many times before. But the extreme concentration of gains in a single sector is starting to smell like the late stages of a cycle."

Related Questions

QWhat is the central theme of the article regarding the performance of tech stocks in 2026?

AThe central theme is a 'liquidity siphon' or 'black hole' effect within tech stocks, where capital is being aggressively pulled from software stocks and funneled into the semiconductor sector, creating a historic performance gap.

QWhich two ETFs are highlighted to demonstrate the extreme divergence between the semiconductor and software sectors?

AThe iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and the iShares Expanded Tech-Software ETF (IGV) are highlighted. SOXX was up 78.5% year-to-date, while IGV was down 12.5%, a gap exceeding 90 percentage points.

QWhat is driving the massive capital expenditure from the 'hyperscale' companies, and what is the estimated total for 2026?

AThe massive capital expenditure is driven by the AI infrastructure 'arms race'. The combined capex of Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, and Meta is estimated to be between $650 billion and $725 billion for 2026, nearly double the 2025 figure.

QWhat are the two main reasons given for the severe underperformance of software stocks?

AThe two main reasons are: 1) Direct liquidity siphoning, where funds flow from software into the surging semiconductor sector. 2) A valuation narrative shift, where AI's capabilities (like automated coding) threaten the traditional SaaS subscription business model, raising questions about its long-term viability.

QWhat two critical unresolved questions about the market trend does the article present at the end?

AThe two unresolved questions are: 1) How long can the hyperscale companies sustain their enormous capital expenditures? 2) Is software poised to become the next sector for a rotational rally, or is the semiconductor momentum still strong?

Related Reads

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

In the past month, the market has been actively trading contrasting expectations, balancing global supply chain disruptions fueling re-inflation against both actual and anticipated (Walsh) interest rate hikes. This volatility has impacted commodities and most equities, though tech has temporarily benefited from concentrated short-term liquidity. Fundamentally, as previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the US faces deep-seated balance sheet issues beyond what any single Fed chair can resolve. Hypotheses around a figure like Walsh could only materialize if AI fundamentally reshapes production relations. Until then, most non-AI-leading nations (effectively all except the US and China) risk fiscal and monetary policy collapse, rendering the identity of the Fed chair ultimately irrelevant. For crypto assets, there is currently no clear role in these dominant narratives. The market remains strongly capped by the 200-day moving average. While trends may shift from "anything but AI" to "anything but mines," this phase is dominated by the silicon vs. carbon (AI vs. traditional) dichotomy, leaving little room for crypto—though its time will come. **Market Overview & Commentary** The crypto market lacks significant catalysts beyond hype, plagued by low volume and scarce innovation, with clear technical resistance. Currently, crypto struggles for attention as global focus lies elsewhere. Assets like gold, oil, and grains are more direct hedges against supply-chain-driven inflation/stagflation. Bitcoin needs more time for capitulation and consolidation; this reset is expected to last until at least Q4 2026. Looking ahead, three factors will likely drive future market volatility: 1. Whether Walsh repeats the patterns of predecessors like Bassant or Musk, shifting stance into a new policy cycle. 2. The market underestimates the severity of global supply chain damage and the prolonged time needed for repair, which will eventually lead to recognition of acute resource shortages and price swings. 3. AI non-beneficiary, high-inflation nations (e.g., UK, Japan) will face severe fiscal and monetary crises. Rapid AI-driven displacement could trigger a collapse of existing credit and welfare systems. Ultimately, the market may realize that an AI bubble burst could spark contagious sovereign credit crises. The monetary and fiscal responses to such a scenario could serve as the ultimate catalyst for Bitcoin's next major bull run.

marsbit23m ago

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

marsbit23m ago

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

The largest IPO in history is imminent as SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is set to price its offering on June 12. At a targeted valuation near $2 trillion, this event will mint new billionaires from Musk's inner circle of long-time allies, rewarding their loyalty with unprecedented returns. Key beneficiaries include Antonio Gracias, Musk's close friend and confidant, who holds a 7.3% stake potentially worth over $140 billion, making him the second-largest individual shareholder. Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO since 2002, holds shares valued at roughly $2 billion. Bret Johnsen, the CFO, holds stock worth approximately $1.4 billion. Luke Nosek, a PayPal co-founder and early investor, stands to gain about $5.3 billion. The IPO filing also reveals complex and controversial financial arrangements. SpaceX has guaranteed nearly $20 billion in payments from xAI's subsidiary to Gracias's Valor Equity Partners for AI hardware leases—deals auditors flagged as "failed sale-leaseback" transactions, forcing SpaceX to record them as debt. Despite rapid revenue growth, SpaceX is not profitable, posting a $49 billion loss in 2025 and a $4.3 billion loss in Q1 2026. Capital expenditures are soaring, with over 60% directed toward AI. Public investors will inherit these losses, significant debts, and a governance structure heavily controlled by insiders, including a provision granting Musk up to a billion additional shares if one million people live on Mars.

链捕手25m ago

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

链捕手25m ago

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

The article titled "Ethereum Becomes a Chinese Concept Stock" presents a critical analysis of Ethereum's perceived decline in market confidence and its structural parallels to Chinese companies listed on US stock exchanges. It begins by noting significant sell-offs by early investors like Wanxiang and key figures like Bankless's Hoffman in 2026, despite Ethereum's strong fundamental activity. The piece questions the erosion of trust in Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation (EF), arguing that while other ecosystems have faced founder controversies, Ethereum's issues stem from its internal governance model. The author draws a direct comparison to "China concept stocks," which are Chinese businesses operating globally but reliant on foreign capital and listings. Similarly, Ethereum, funded early by Chinese capital like Wanxiang, developed a strong institutional framework from its IXO to its PoS transition. The core problem, according to the article, is a leadership vacuum regarding price and direction. Vitalik's move to make the EF smaller and less active is framed as a mistake. While he advocates for ETH as a "commodity," the ecosystem lacks a clear entity to steward its price stability, creating tension within the PoS system, as seen with Lido's challenges. The narrative suggests that excessive abstraction and a hands-off approach from the EF have left the community adrift, contrasting with more proactive foundations like Solana's. The article then examines emerging technical narratives for Ethereum: privacy (ZK-proofs), AI integration, and a refocus on Layer-1. However, it observes a shift from Ethereum leading as a "world computer" to merely adapting to trends like AI, where crypto-native projects are finding success independently of Ethereum. The piece posits that Ethereum's unique value in an increasingly fragmented world may be as a permissionless, global financial testing ground—a neutral platform amid geopolitical tensions. In conclusion, it asserts that Ethereum's fate mirrors that of China concept stocks: an asset born from one region (conceptually "A"), funded by another ("B"), and dependent on "B" for exit liquidity. While Ethereum's "golden age" may be over, and selling pressure from early backers will continue, it remains positioned as a critical linkage point in a divided global landscape, standing at a new, albeit uncertain, starting point.

marsbit50m ago

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

marsbit50m ago

AI Agents Fundamentally Transform Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New Agent Paradigm in 2026

AI Agents Are Redefining Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the 2026 Agentic Paradigm The recent controversy in Rugpull Bakery, a competitive baking game on Abstract chain, highlighted a pivotal shift. Player complaints about unfair bot automation in Season 2 led developers to not ban them, but instead formally integrate AI agents as core gameplay in Season 3, providing official guides (skill.md, agent.json). This move signals Web3 gaming's transition into the "Agentic Gaming" era, where AI agents are sovereign entities with independent strategy and economic rights, moving beyond simple automation. By 2026, AI agent integration has evolved into three core models reshaping the ecosystem: 1. **Autonomous Competitors & Economic Entities:** Agents act as independent players. Examples include TEN Protocol's poker-playing agents, AI Arena's trainable NFT fighters, Satoshi Strike Force's "Digital Athletes" trained on player data, and Somnia's "Agentic L1" blockchain providing native infrastructure for millions of autonomous agents. 2. **Modular Infrastructure & Programmable Environments:** Games like EVE Frontier enable "server-side modding," allowing AI agents to program game world logic directly into structures like smart storage, turrets, and stargates via Smart Assemblies. Coupled with standards like ERC-8183, which enables autonomous job creation and payment between agents, in-game infrastructure gains a "commercial soul." 3. **Hybrid Companions & Dynamic Adaptive Worlds:** This model focuses on human-AI collaboration. In Parallel Colony, players guide highly autonomous AI Avatars with unique personalities and goals. Illuvium plans to use AI to transform NPCs into dynamic, context-aware entities that create personalized, emergent narratives. The conclusion is clear: blocking automation is futile. The future lies in leveraging blockchain's transparency and programmability to empower AI agents as first-class citizens. Web3 gaming is shifting from inefficient human labor to efficient algorithmic interplay and emergent intelligence, creating a "post-human" digital frontier where players become commanders and symbiotic partners in a new socioeconomic experiment.

marsbit50m ago

AI Agents Fundamentally Transform Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New Agent Paradigm in 2026

marsbit50m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片