Spot Bitcoin ETF and Spot Ethereum ETF Record Inflow, Now for the Third Consecutive Day

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-15Last updated on 2026-01-15

Abstract

Spot Bitcoin ETF and Spot Ethereum ETF have recorded inflows for the third consecutive day, signaling a recovering crypto market. On January 14, 2026, Spot Bitcoin ETF saw an inflow of $840.6 million, led by BlackRock’s IBIT with $648.4 million. Similarly, Spot Ethereum ETF attracted $175.1 million, with BlackRock’s ETHA leading at $81.6 million. No outflows were reported for either ETF that day. This positive trend comes despite a slight rise in inflation and reduced expectations of a Fed rate cut. The crypto market cap increased by 1.35% to $3.27 trillion, with Bitcoin trading at $96,633.89 and projected to rise further.

Both Spot Bitcoin ETF and Spot Ethereum ETF recorded inflows for the third consecutive day this week. The crypto market is recovering, and ETF inflows seem to be a reflection of the same. This development comes despite fewer chances for the US Federal Reserve to cut rates and a recent inflation report.

Spot Bitcoin ETF Inflows

Spot Bitcoin ETF noted an inflow of $840.6 million on January 14, 2026. Leading the chart was BlackRock’s IBIT with an inward movement of $648.4 million. The second-highest inflow worth $125.4 million, on the same day, was recorded by Fidelity’s FBTC. Interestingly, not a single outflow point was observed that day.

This is the third consecutive inflow for Spot Bitcoin ETF because it earlier registered similar flows on December 12 and 13, 2026, for $116.7 million and $753.8 million, respectively. This week, so far, has seen only the injection of funds into the ETF ecosystem of BTC.

Spot Ethereum ETF Inflows

On January 14, 2026, Spot Ethereum ETF saw an inflow of $175.1 million. This came after Jan 12 and 13, 2026, registered positive flows of $5.1 million and $130 million, applicable in the same order. BlackRock with ETHA was again the venture with the highest inflow of $81.6 million, followed by Grayscale’s ETH.

Not a single entity reported outflow on January 14, 2026, for Ether ETF as well. Its cumulative historical inflows now stand at $12.76 billion. The cumulative historical inflows for Spot Bitcoin ETF are higher in comparison, $58.09 billion.

Crypto Market Recovery

The inflation rate for December 2025 saw a slight jump to 2.71% from 2.68% for November 2025. However, the crypto market showed signs of recovery despite this rollout. The market cap surged by 1.35% to $3.27 trillion. Even the FGI shifted to 54 points as BTC continues to lead optimistic sentiments.

Bitcoin tokens are trading at $96,633.89, up by 1.83% over the last 24 hours. BTC price prediction now projects a growth of 6.74% in the next 1 month, taking the value as high as $102,889. Recovery is also evident from other tokens that have gained during the same timeline – ETH, BNB, and SOL, among many others, at the time of writing this article.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Argentina’s Lemon Launches Bitcoin-Backed Visa Credit Card

TagsBitcoin ETFEthereum ETF

Related Questions

QFor how many consecutive days have both Spot Bitcoin ETF and Spot Ethereum ETF recorded inflows as of the report?

AFor three consecutive days.

QWhat was the total inflow amount for Spot Bitcoin ETF on January 14, 2026, and which fund had the highest inflow that day?

AThe total inflow was $840.6 million, with BlackRock's IBIT having the highest inflow of $648.4 million.

QWhat were the inflow amounts for Spot Ethereum ETF on January 12 and January 13, 2026?

AThe inflows were $5.1 million on January 12 and $130 million on January 13, 2026.

QWhat is the cumulative historical inflow amount for Spot Bitcoin ETF mentioned in the article?

AThe cumulative historical inflow for Spot Bitcoin ETF is $58.09 billion.

QDespite the slight increase in the inflation rate for December 2025, what was the change in the total crypto market cap and the current Fear & Greed Index (FGI) score?

AThe crypto market cap surged by 1.35% to $3.27 trillion, and the FGI shifted to 54 points.

Related Reads

From 'Word Unit' to 'Symbol Unit': The Debate Over the Chinese Translation of 'Token' and Its Underlying AI Cognitive Implications

Recent discussions have emerged regarding the official Chinese translation of the AI term "Token," which has been recommended as “词元” (Cíyuán, meaning "word unit") by the National Committee for Terminology in Science and Technology. While this translation is argued to align with historical usage in natural language processing (NLP) and is considered concise and communicable, this article presents a critical counterview advocating for “符元” (Fúyuán, meaning "symbol unit") as a more structurally accurate and future-proof alternative. The author argues that defining Token based on its origin in NLP—as a linguistic semantic unit—overlooks its evolution into a general-purpose, discrete symbolic unit used across multimodal systems (text, image, audio, etc.). Using “词元” ties the concept too narrowly to language, causing cognitive misalignment and semantic drift when applied in non-linguistic contexts. By contrast, “符元” reflects Token’s fundamental role as a symbol in information theory and computation, independent of modality. The article further critiques the reliance on metaphorical extensions (e.g., comparing image patches to “words”) as insufficient for rigorous terminology. It highlights risks including confusion with existing linguistic terms like Lemma (also translated as “词元”), poor cross-lingual reversibility (e.g., difficult back-translation to English), and systemic misunderstanding among non-expert audiences. In conclusion, the author emphasizes that terminology should align with computational essence—not historical usage or explanatory convenience—to ensure conceptual clarity and scalability in AI’s multidisciplinary future. “符元” is proposed as a more neutral, stable, and structurally coherent translation for Token.

marsbit1h ago

From 'Word Unit' to 'Symbol Unit': The Debate Over the Chinese Translation of 'Token' and Its Underlying AI Cognitive Implications

marsbit1h ago

Aave Mired in a Crisis of Confidence: Service Providers Exit En Masse, Failures in Technology, Governance, and Risk Control

Aave, a leading DeFi lending protocol, is facing a severe internal crisis marked by the departure of key service providers, raising concerns about its governance, security, and future direction. The crisis began when Chaos Labs, the protocol's long-time risk management provider, terminated its relationship with Aave. The firm cited financial losses, the exit of other major contributors, and fundamental disagreements over the risk architecture of the upcoming Aave V4. Aave Labs declined Chaos Labs' demands for a significant fee increase and exclusive control over key functions like risk management and oracle services. This exit followed the departure of two other critical partners. BGD Labs, the primary technical contributor to Aave V3, accused Aave Labs of forcing an aggressive transition to V4 by limiting V3 development and devaluing its work. Subsequently, the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), a major governance service provider, announced its planned exit, criticizing Aave Labs for centralizing power and controlling a large portion of voting tokens. The conflict highlights a central paradox within DAOs: the tension between founder-led vision and decentralized governance, and between long-term protocol health and short-term capital interests. Aave Labs is pushing for a more integrated and efficient "Aave Will Win" model with V4, arguing it is necessary for competing at an institutional level. However, critics warn this centralization comes at the cost of the protocol's decentralized credibility and increases systemic risk. The immediate impacts include a potential security downgrade, a loss of institutional knowledge, and damaged community trust. While Aave Labs views this as a painful but necessary transition, the market is watching cautiously as the protocol navigates this period of significant internal turmoil.

marsbit1h ago

Aave Mired in a Crisis of Confidence: Service Providers Exit En Masse, Failures in Technology, Governance, and Risk Control

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片