Rhythm X Zhihu Event Agenda Released: Skills Demo + Keynote Speech + Roundtable to Thoroughly Explain Agents and On-Chain Finance

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-17Last updated on 2026-04-17

Abstract

The recent dispute between EvoMap and Hermes over alleged抄袭, similar to the Claude and OpenClaw case, highlights a growing trend in the Agent ecosystem. These conflicts arise from competition over user choice—specifically, which Agent users select for similar tasks—and the definition of original core competencies. Such public disagreements indicate that competition among Agents has intensified to the point where founders are losing their composure. Ultimately, users hold the decision-making power. This issue foreshadows a broader challenge: as Agents become more numerous and capable, how should individuals navigate this evolving landscape? This topic will be explored in-depth at the upcoming event.

You must have some understanding of the incident where EvoMap accused Hermes of plagiarism.

Just like Claude accusing OpenClaw of plagiarism, similar incidents are bound to become increasingly common.

Because fundamentally, it's about territory: which Agent users choose for similar tasks, or where the boundaries of original core competitiveness lie within Agents. This dispute illustrates one thing—the competition among Agents has become so real that it can make founders lose their composure. The choice rests in the hands of users.

This is also an issue we will all soon face: as Agents become more numerous and capable of handling many tasks, what should we do? This is precisely the question we will explore at our event.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main topic of the upcoming event mentioned in the article?

AThe event will focus on Agent technology and on-chain finance, featuring Skills Demo, keynote speeches, and roundtable discussions to thoroughly explain these topics.

QWhat recent controversy in the Agent space does the article reference?

AThe article references the controversy where EvoMap accused Hermes of plagiarism, similar to how Claude accused OpenClaw of copying, indicating increasing competition among Agents.

QWhat does the article suggest about user choice in the Agent ecosystem?

AThe article suggests that users have the ultimate choice in selecting which Agent to use for similar tasks, and this user preference is driving intense competition among Agent developers.

QAccording to the article, why are founders of Agent projects becoming less calm?

AFounders are losing冷静 because competition among Agents has become so real and intense that it is leading to public accusations of plagiarism and disputes over original boundaries of core competitiveness.

QWhat key question does the article say the event will address regarding Agents?

AThe event will address the question of how users should navigate the growing number of Agents and the many tasks they can perform, exploring the challenges and choices in the Agent ecosystem.

Related Reads

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbit18m ago

Prediction Markets Under Bias

marsbit18m ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit28m ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit28m ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit1h ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit1h ago

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

Kevin Warsh, a nominee for the Federal Reserve chair, faces a challenging confirmation hearing amid political pressure from former President Donald Trump to implement immediate and significant interest rate cuts. Warsh has proposed reforms including reducing the Fed’s communication frequency and shrinking its $6.7 trillion balance sheet. However, market expectations for rate cuts remain limited, creating tension with Trump’s demands. Warsh’s stance has shifted over time, from hawkish during the financial crisis to more dovish recently, citing AI-driven productivity gains. His confirmation is further complicated by Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s threat to block the nomination unless an investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell is dropped. Trump has warned of firing Powell if he doesn’t leave on time. Observers note that Warsh risks becoming a "scapegoat"—either by yielding to political pressure and fueling inflation, or by resisting and facing Trump’s backlash. His ties to Trump’s circle and Wall Street support may aid his nomination, but his ability to balance political demands with the Fed’s credibility remains uncertain. Historical precedents, like Arthur Burns’s compliance with Nixon, highlight the risks of political interference in monetary policy.

marsbit1h ago

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

marsbit1h ago

Plunging 10% Then Surging: Weekend Crude Oil Market Watch

Following a 10% plunge, oil prices surged over the weekend as geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz escalated dramatically. The initial market optimism, driven by the strait’s brief reopening on Friday, quickly reversed on Saturday when Iran reinstated restrictions and fired on vessels, halting nearly all traffic. In response, oil contracts rose approximately 4.52%, while S&P futures fell nearly 0.8%. U.S. President Trump alternated between diplomatic gestures—sending an envoy for talks—and threats to destroy Iranian infrastructure if no deal was reached. Iran rejected further negotiations, fearing a U.S. attack before the midweek ceasefire deadline. This triggered another spike in oil, surpassing Saturday’s highs, and further pressured equity markets. Crypto-related stocks underperformed significantly. Market optimism is expected to be punished, and the week ahead hinges on whether Iran maintains its refusal to negotiate.

marsbit1h ago

Plunging 10% Then Surging: Weekend Crude Oil Market Watch

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片