Brale Claims New Protocol Can Eliminate a Major Obstacle to Scaling Custom Tokens

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-30Last updated on 2026-07-30

Abstract

Stablecoin infrastructure firm Brale is launching a compatibility protocol, called ION, designed to solve a key bottleneck in the industry: moving the rapidly growing number of custom-branded stablecoins across different blockchains. The protocol allows participating stablecoins to move between blockchains by burning tokens on one network and minting an equivalent amount on another. Unlike most blockchain bridges, this model does not require pre-funded liquidity pools in each supported chain. While the $300 billion stablecoin market is dominated by Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC, a wave of new entrants—including banks, fintechs, crypto firms, and asset managers—are issuing their own tokens for payments, settlements, and tokenized assets. Over 350 such asset-pegged coins are already tracked, highlighting the need for infrastructure to connect this increasingly fragmented ecosystem. Brale, which supports over 100 stablecoin programs across more than 30 blockchains, argues that current interoperability models relying on liquidity pools or wrapped tokens are not scalable. These models require locking up capital in every supported network, creating an unsustainable capital requirement as the number of stablecoins and blockchains grows. Brale's founder and CEO, Ben Miln, stated that "liquidity between stablecoin programs is the No. 1 barrier to scaling individual stablecoins," noting there isn't enough capital in the world to solve the problem via liquidity pools. ION's burn-a...

Brale, a stablecoin infrastructure firm, is implementing a compatibility protocol designed to put an end to what it says is an industry development bottleneck: moving the rapidly growing number of custom stablecoins across blockchains.

Dubbed the ION protocol, it allows participating stablecoins to move between blockchains by burning tokens on one network and minting an equivalent amount on another. Unlike most blockchain bridges, this model does not require pre-funding liquidity pools in each supported blockchain.

The $300 billion stablecoin market is dominated by Tether (USDT) and Circle ($USDC), but new entrants are emerging. Banks, fintech companies, cryptocurrency firms, and asset managers are increasingly issuing their own branded tokens for payments, settlements, and tokenized assets.

Data provider CoinGecko already tracks over 350 coins whose value is pegged to a real-world asset such as fiat currency, highlighting the growing need for infrastructure to connect an increasingly fragmented ecosystem. Brale argues that today's compatibility model will not scale as more issuers introduce their own versions.

The Stablecoin Scaling Problem

"The company supports over 100 stablecoin programs across more than 30 blockchains", said Ben Milne, founder and CEO of Brale.

Many of its clients process billions of dollars in monthly payments while maintaining relatively small stablecoin balances, as their tokens are designed for transactions, not investments.

Moving assets between blockchains typically relies on liquidity pools or wrapped tokens, requiring capital to be locked up in each supported network. As the number of stablecoins and blockchains grows, so does the need for capital.

"Liquidity between stablecoin programs is barrier No. 1 to scaling individual stablecoins," Milne said. "There isn't enough capital in the world to solve this problem."

Due to insufficient capital to create deep liquidity pools for every stablecoin on every blockchain, the current model becomes unsustainable as issuance accelerates. Instead, ION applies a "burn-and-mint" approach, similar to Circle's ($USDC) Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP), extending the model to any participating stablecoin issuer rather than a single token.

The protocol will debut with partners such as Monad, Rain, Coinflow, Turnkey, Etherfuse, Spark, and Canton, initially on a testnet and then more broadly.

end-content

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the new ION protocol announced by Brale?

AThe main purpose of the new ION protocol is to enable the transfer of participating stablecoins between blockchains by burning tokens on one network and minting an equivalent amount on another, eliminating the need for pre-funded liquidity pools.

QAccording to Ben Milne, what is the number one barrier to scaling individual stablecoins?

AAccording to Ben Milne, founder and CEO of Brale, the number one barrier to scaling individual stablecoins is liquidity between stablecoin programs.

QHow does the current dominant model for moving assets between blockchains create a scaling problem?

AThe current dominant model relies on liquidity pools or wrapped tokens, requiring capital to be locked in each supported network. As the number of stablecoins and blockchains grows, the capital requirement grows with it, becoming unsustainable.

QWhat key difference does the ION protocol have compared to most blockchain bridges?

AUnlike most blockchain bridges, the ION protocol does not require pre-funded liquidity pools in each supported blockchain. It uses a burn-and-mint model.

QWhich two companies are mentioned as dominating the $300 billion stablecoin market?

AThe two companies mentioned as dominating the $300 billion stablecoin market are Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC).

Related Reads

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

The U.S. Senate has taken a key step regarding the CLARITY Act, which could shape the future of the U.S. crypto market. On July 29, Senators Tom Tillis and Ruben Gallego finalized amendments to the bill's "conflict of interest" rules, one of its most contentious aspects. The bipartisan bill aims to tighten restrictions on high-level federal officials' ties to digital assets. The new text, crafted as an alternative to a White House-endorsed ethics code, is expected to impose stricter rules limiting officials' ability to issue or directly participate in digital asset projects. However, with Congress entering an August recess and the revised text not yet reviewed by much of the Senate, the bill's timeline is uncertain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated a procedural vote could occur between July 29 and August 1 but expressed doubt the full bill could pass before the break. The House-approved CLARITY Act, passed in July 2025, has been under Senate negotiation for over a year. Key goals of the CLARITY Act include clarifying jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, setting rules for digital commodity spot markets, and addressing topics like stablecoin yields, DeFi, and illicit financing. The stablecoin yield provisions could significantly impact U.S.-based DeFi protocols, exchanges, and issuers, affecting their global competitiveness. The outcome is being closely watched by both the U.S. and global digital asset markets.

cryptonews.ru39m ago

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

cryptonews.ru39m ago

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, has been added to Russia's list of terrorists and extremists by Rosfinmonitoring, as published on July 30. The entry includes his name and date of birth. The designation follows an announcement by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on July 29, which charged Durov with aiding terrorist activity. The FSB alleges that a Telegram dating bot named "DaiVinchik" was used to recruit 46 individuals for attacks on police and arson, orchestrated by Ukrainian special services. The FSB also accuses Telegram's administration of failing to remove channels and bots used by Ukrainian intelligence and extremist groups. Durov is reportedly subject to an international arrest warrant. Inclusion on the Rosfinmonitoring list leads to significant restrictions: the freezing of Durov's bank accounts and assets, severe limitations on financial transactions, and a ban on election participation, media interaction, and event organization. Transfers to his accounts may be considered terrorism financing. For ordinary Russian Telegram users, purchasing Telegram Premium is not classified as financing terrorism, according to an IT expert. General use of the messenger—messaging, managing channels—does not automatically make a user a participant in extremist activity. There has been no official decision to ban Telegram itself. It is noted that French authorities are also investigating Durov over allegations of inadequate measures against criminal activity on the platform and insufficient cooperation with law enforcement. Durov denies all charges.

cryptonews.ru48m ago

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

cryptonews.ru48m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片