Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-31Last updated on 2026-07-31

Abstract

Base, a layer-2 blockchain, argues that its established distribution network will outlast Robinhood Chain's initial popularity surge. While Robinhood Chain quickly attracted 230,000 daily active users and over $9 billion in DEX volume (primarily from meme coins) shortly after launch, its core feature of tokenized stocks saw minimal use. Base acknowledged shortcomings in focusing on social blockchain products and lagging in areas like perpetual contracts, predictions markets, and on-chain tokenized stocks—a move Robinhood got right. In response, Base highlights its nearly three-year head start in building infrastructure. It emphasizes its x402 payment protocol, which has processed 187.8 million agent payments, its $3.9 billion in stablecoin deposits (mostly USDC), and its integration with partners like Visa, Shopify, and JPMorgan for institutional and merchant settlements. Base contends these capabilities for corporate payments and stablecoin liquidity represent a more durable and defensible ecosystem than Robinhood's retail trading metrics. Coinbase plans to launch its own on-chain, share-backed tokenized stocks on Base, which would directly challenge Robinhood's key differentiating feature. Base's strategy bets that its deep-rooted distribution and institutional partnerships will prove harder to overcome than Robinhood's early, meme-driven volume, which may fade after the initial launch hype.

In just four weeks since launch, Robinhood Chain has attracted around 230,000 daily active users, enough to solidly overtake Base in this metric. Its total DEX trading volume also surpassed $9 billion, including a 24-hour peak of $877.6 million on July 12, which briefly made Robinhood Chain the second-largest chain in the world, trailing only Solana.

However, more than 80% of this volume came from meme coin trading, not the tokenized stocks that Robinhood had positioned as its key feature; the latter accounted for just 4% of network activity. In fact, by July 25th, that figure had grown roughly five-fold, but even then, tokenized stocks still made up only a small fraction of the network's daily DEX turnover (with stablecoins remaining the largest category).

Base Missed the Mark

The timing of these figures seemed to put Base at a disadvantage, and in two lengthy X posts, co-founder Jesse Pollak acknowledged that the network's bet on social blockchain products (i.e., Farcaster, Zora, mini-apps, and creator coins) "completely missed the mark," leaving it behind in key areas that "are now becoming more important," including perpetual contracts and prediction markets.

He also admitted that tokenized stocks in the EVM environment were something "Robinhood Chain got right," and that Base "lagged behind on that," though a solution was imminent. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong made a similar admission earlier this month, noting Base's "creator coin" strategy hadn't worked, adding:

Base is focused on trading, payments, and agents (in that order). I think all three are inextricably linked. The majority of resources are going to trading right now, for what it's worth. It may not be obvious to the outside world yet, but that's what's happening.

The Case Presented

Base's response leaned on distribution built over nearly three years, rather than a direct rebuttal of Robinhood's DAU or DEX trading volume metrics. Céline Beinhamm-Herd, Head of Global Development at Base, told Bitcoin.com News that the network's x402 payment protocol has already processed 187.8 million agent-mediated payments worth $42.4 million with over 5,000 merchants.

She also noted that Visa included Base in its stablecoin settlement pilot alongside Polygon, Arc, and six other chains, and mentioned the project's May update dubbed "Azul," which merged trusted execution environments with zero-knowledge multi-proofs, reducing final settlement times for withdrawals to roughly one day.

Traditional payment processors charge fixed fees of up to 30 cents per transaction, making online micropayments unfeasible, Beinhamm-Herd pointed out; x402 reduces protocol fees to zero and gas costs to about one-hundredth of a cent, positioning the Visa pilot as recognition that legacy rails are simply more expensive, not a marketing concession.

Base's scope extends beyond agent payments to traditional stablecoin liquidity, with roughly $3.9 billion in stablecoins held on the network (about 90% of which is $USDC), putting it on par with Arbitrum at the top of the L2 stablecoin rankings. Furthermore, Shopify processes $USDC payments on Base, and JPMorgan also settles its tokenized deposit product there – capabilities, as Beinhamm-Herd noted, unavailable to a chain only four weeks old.

Finally, she pointed out that the aforementioned figures represent a completely different level of activity than Robinhood Chain's retail metrics, specifically system-to-system payments and corporate settlements, not DAU or DEX volumes, adding:

Developers go where the users are. Users go where the applications work and provide utility. This flywheel is the moat. The only metric I pay attention to is whether applications have users returning without being rewarded for it. If they don't, no TVL or DAU metric matters.

What Comes Next

Coinbase has announced the launch of tokenized stocks on its centralized exchange, so the gap Pollak seemed to hint at pertains specifically to the on-chain version, native to the Landing Base, built on a 1:1 stock-backed model, which doesn't yet have a confirmed launch date.

Robinhood's tokens, by contrast, are structured as tokenized debt securities (i.e., holders don't get voting rights or shareholder privileges and can't claim the underlying shares directly, only a cash redemption). The launch of Base's on-chain product would erase the most obvious remaining advantage for Robinhood.

This, coupled with Base's push into institutional and agent payments, underpins Coinbase's strategy: Robinhood's early lead, still over 80% fueled by meme coins, is easier to surpass than the distribution network Base has been building for nearly three years. Whether this bet pays off will be seen in whether Base's tokenized stock volume continues to grow exponentially after the initial launch metrics start to fade.

end-content

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what key metric did Robinhood Chain surpass Base in shortly after launch, and by approximately how much?

ARobinhood Chain surpassed Base in daily active users (DAU), attracting about 230,000 DAU within four weeks of its launch.

QWhat did Base's co-founder Jesse Pollak acknowledge as having 'fully failed' in the network's strategy?

AJesse Pollak acknowledged that the network's bet on social products on the blockchain (i.e., Farcaster, Zora, mini-apps, and creator coins) 'fully failed.'

QWhat is the primary advantage that Base claims will outlast Robinhood Chain's initial popularity surge, as argued by Base's global development lead Xen Beinham-Herd?

ABase claims its advantage lies in the distribution network it has built over nearly three years, particularly citing its use for institutional and on-chain payments (like Visa's pilot and agent payments via x402), corporate settlements, and its deep stablecoin liquidity.

QWhat is the fundamental structural difference mentioned between Robinhood Chain's tokenized stocks and the potential on-chain version planned for Base?

ARobinhood's tokens are structured as tokenized debt securities, where holders have no voting rights or shareholder claims. In contrast, Base's planned on-chain version would be a stock-backed model with a 1:1 backing of real shares.

QAccording to Xen Beinham-Herd, what is the 'only metric' he pays attention to when evaluating an application's success?

AHe stated the only metric he pays attention to is whether applications have users who return without being rewarded for it. He argues that if they don't, no TVL or DAU metrics matter.

Related Reads

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit56m ago

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit56m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片