Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-05Last updated on 2026-06-05

Abstract

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

Author: Jae, PANews

Flowing narratives, steadfast Near. From a high-performance public chain and sharding for scalability, to chain abstraction and Intents, and now to the hottest topic of AI Agent, Near has hardly missed any major narrative throughout several past crypto cycles.

Backed by Illia Polosukhin, co-author of the classic Transformer AI paper and hailed as "the one who understands AI best in Web3," Near has delivered surprisingly impressive results even during the bear market. Today, Near is a cross-chain infrastructure giant that has processed over $20 billion in cumulative cross-chain transaction volume and generated over $34 million in fee revenue.

However, few know that Near's birth wasn't born from a grand blockchain ideal, but rather from a somewhat awkward practical dilemma: the inability to pay cross-border salaries. Eight years ago, to solve the problem of paying its global developers, the AI startup co-founded by Illia Polosukhin was forced to pause its AI dream and pivot to building a public chain.

Now, as the AI wave sweeps the globe, this public chain, born from AI and once sidetracked for AI, has returned to where the story began.

Payroll Problem Unexpectedly Gives Birth to a Public Chain, Now Returning to the AI Track

History sometimes comes full circle in a remarkable way. Nine years ago, Illia Polosukhin was not yet one of the crypto founders most associated with AI.

Near was founded in 2017 by Illia Polosukhin, co-author of the Transformer paper and former Google machine learning researcher, and Alexander Skidanov, a distributed systems expert.

Near was initially an artificial intelligence startup focused on the field of "Program Synthesis," essentially "teaching machines to write code" to automate software development. Its concept was similar to later projects like OpenAI's CodeX, Anthropic's Claude Code, and Cursor.

To train algorithms and models, the team recruited computer science students worldwide to remotely write code snippets. However, how to pay developers distributed across the globe became a major hurdle.

Cross-border payment systems at the time were far less mature than today. Mainstream tools like PayPal and Wise faced severe limitations in Eastern Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, plagued by delayed settlements and exchange rate losses. Interestingly, when the two founders tried using early public chains for cross-border payments, they found that high Gas fees and low settlement efficiency made it impossible to distribute payments cost-effectively in batches.

For a resource-limited AI startup, this was almost an unsolvable problem. Ultimately, the two founders, with backgrounds in large-scale distributed systems, made a surprising decision: to shelve AI model development and instead build a highly scalable, low-fee, and user-friendly public chain themselves.

This passive pivot, triggered by the inability to "pay salaries," led to the birth of the "Near Protocol" in 2018.

However, the early transition path was not smooth. After leaving the AI track, Near shifted to developing a high-performance public chain focused on sharding technology to solve blockchain's scalability challenges.

With solid technical prowess, the Near Protocol secured over $500 million in cumulative funding during this period. Yet, in the fierce competition of the public chain arena, Near neither formed a landmark application nor managed to attract large-scale developer adoption. Sparse ecosystem applications, stagnant user growth, and low market attention meant that even with an advanced sharding architecture, Near's attention was often diverted by other hot public chains in the crowded "Ethereum killer" environment. The protocol once fell into a quiet period of "critical acclaim but poor sales."

During the 2020-2021 bull market, Near caught the cross-chain trend, with the launch of the Rainbow Bridge becoming a key catalyst for its ecosystem explosion and token price surge.

The outbreak of the AI boom brought a turning point for Near's destiny. In March 2024, at the GTC global developer conference, NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang invited Illia Polosukhin and six other co-authors of the Transformer paper for a stage discussion.

Jensen Huang praised the paper as having "changed the world," emphasizing that the Transformer architecture is the foundation of all AI industry achievements, reshaping the global technology, content, and financial landscape. This spotlight moment allowed Illia Polosukhin, as a co-creator, and Near, with its interrupted AI dream, to once again attract the crypto market's attention with the legitimate status of "AI lineage."

Returning to the battlefield with a new posture, Near's unique "technical core" was further activated. Seizing this opportunity, the protocol pivoted towards Near Intents and confidential transactions, laying a solid foundation amid the trend of multi-chain intent and Agent Economy convergence.

The intent transaction layer significantly lowered the interaction barrier for AI Agents, enabling Agents like Venice AI deployed in confidential hardware TEEs (Trusted Execution Environments) to autonomously, securely, and cost-effectively transfer funds across multiple chains.

Near Intents Becomes New Growth Line, Amassing $20 Billion in Trading Volume

Near Intents redefines the cross-chain trading experience. In the traditional multi-chain environment, users need to manually operate cross-chain bridges, prepare different Gas tokens on source and destination chains, and constantly watch out for slippage and friction costs for a single cross-chain asset swap.

Near uses an intent mechanism to abstract the entire process. Users only need to express their trading needs, such as "swap BTC on the source chain for ETH on the destination chain," without understanding the cross-chain path and Gas costs. This is the interaction experience ordinary users, and even future AI Agents, seek.

The execution of cross-chain transactions relies on an off-chain Solver network's bidding mechanism.

  • When a user submits an intent request, the Solver network bids via the Solver Bus, automatically finding and calculating the optimal execution route and quote.

  • Once the user signs the quote, the intent is submitted to the Verifier smart contract on the Near chain for final settlement.

Throughout this process, Gas fees are deducted seamlessly in the background, allowing users to pay without noticing, effectively unleashing the vitality of DeFi cross-chain trading. The significant optimization of user experience led to widespread integration of Near by traffic gateways like Ledger.

However, the potential centralization of the Solver network is a significant risk. As solvers require ample liquidity for market-making and complex algorithm optimization, trading APIs like 1Click typically rely on trusted swap aggregators and leading market makers. This could lead to oligopoly in the solver market, weakening the price advantages originally brought by the bidding mechanism.

Data from DeFi Llama shows Near Intents is deployed across 25 public chains, covering the major settlement networks of the crypto market.

The protocol's TVL (Total Value Locked) exceeds $85 million. It not only retains $36.5 million in funds on the Near chain but also establishes deep liquidity on chains like Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Tron through chain abstraction mechanisms. This breadth of the cross-chain ecosystem is key to Near Intents surpassing the $20 billion mark in cumulative trading volume.

From a profitability perspective, since the launch of Near Intents, the protocol has generated over $33 million in fees. More than 70% of this revenue came from the last two quarters. This indicates that as the multi-chain ecosystem continues to expand, the protocol's profitability is also showing a growth trend.

The gradually increasing fee revenue will establish a positive feedback mechanism for NEAR at the economic level. The vast majority of network fees are burned, injecting deflationary pressure into the NEAR token and further enhancing its value capture capability.

Confidential Transactions Swallow 40% of Volume: Growth Engine or Regulatory Hazard?

Currently, as on-chain activity grows, privacy needs are no longer a niche demand in the crypto market, and this has become Near's differentiating advantage.

Since launching "Confidential Intents" and "Confidential Swaps" features in the first quarter of this year, their adoption rate has risen rapidly. Over the past 30 days, the total trading volume on the Near chain was $209 million, with confidential swap volume reaching $87 million, accounting for 41.63%. This data reflects not just product adoption but the genuine existence of market demand.

Behind this business explosion is Near addressing a long-standing structural pain point in the DeFi market: the highly transparent on-chain ledger exposes the positions and intentions of large traders. This leads to severe sandwich attacks (MEV), significant slippage, and strategy leakage when institutions or whales execute large trades.

The Confidential Intents feature, by introducing programmable privacy technology, allows users to seamlessly switch to "confidential mode" on the frontend interface. In this mode: the transaction amount, direction, and position are completely hidden from the outside world during execution, with only verifiable encrypted accounting performed on-chain at settlement.

Bots' sandwich attacks fail, and traders' business secrets are protected. The Confidential Swaps feature will open a relatively safe DeFi channel for institutional capital, reducing trading friction and facilitating the integration of on-chain ecosystems with mainstream finance.

However, the other side of the coin cannot be ignored. A privacy transaction share exceeding 40% proves the existence of real demand but may also attract regulatory scrutiny. Global regulatory pressure on privacy protocols like Tornado Cash has never eased. Anonymous large-scale fund flows are more likely to trigger regulatory enforcement. If regulators deem the "Confidential Swaps" model to pose money laundering risks, Near may inevitably fall under regulatory scrutiny, potentially becoming its biggest future uncertainty.

Looking back on its nine-year journey, Near's growth script shows a highly dramatic trajectory. Despite experiencing public chain competition, market cycles, and narrative shifts, it has continuously adjusted its development direction.

Today, chain abstraction, Intents, and confidential transactions have become Near's new exploration focus. The AI boom has prompted the market to re-examine this public chain's unique background. However, whether these attempts can help Near build a more solid ecosystem moat still requires more time to observe.

Related Questions

QWhat was the original motivation behind the creation of the NEAR blockchain, and what problem was it trying to solve?

AThe NEAR blockchain was created to solve a practical problem: an AI startup founded by Illia Polosukhin and Alexander Skidanov couldn't efficiently pay its globally distributed team of developers due to high costs and inefficiencies in existing cross-border payment systems and early blockchains.

QHow has the NEAR protocol's 'Intents' mechanism improved the user experience for cross-chain transactions?

ANEAR's 'Intents' mechanism abstracts the complexity of cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their desired outcome (e.g., 'swap BTC for ETH'), and a network of solvers automatically finds and executes the optimal route, handling gas fees in the background, making the process seamless and user-friendly.

QWhat is a key risk associated with the solver network that powers the NEAR Intents system?

AA key risk is potential centralization and oligopoly within the solver network. As solvers require significant liquidity and complex algorithms, major market makers and trusted exchange APIs could dominate, potentially undermining the price competition the bidding mechanism is designed to foster.

QWhat does the significant adoption of NEAR's 'Confidential Swaps' feature indicate about the current DeFi market?

AThe high adoption rate of 'Confidential Swaps' (over 40% of recent NEAR transaction volume) indicates a strong and growing market demand for on-chain privacy, particularly among institutional and large traders seeking to protect their strategies from MEV attacks, front-running, and slippage.

QWhat is the potential regulatory challenge highlighted for NEAR's private transaction features?

AThe regulatory challenge is that the high volume of private transactions could attract scrutiny from global financial watchdogs. Regulators may view features like 'Confidential Swaps' as potential tools for money laundering, similar to their stance on other privacy protocols, which could pose a significant future risk for NEAR.

Related Reads

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit3h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片