Unable to Retain with a $100 Million Annual Salary, Yu Jiahui Departs Meta to Start His Own Venture

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-14Last updated on 2026-08-14

Abstract

Despite a reported compensation package rumored to be worth up to $100 million over four years, AI researcher Jiahui Yu has announced his departure from Meta after just over a year to start his own company. Yu joined Meta in June 2025 as a founding member and multimodal lead of the TBD Lab within Meta's Superintelligence Labs (MSL). During his tenure, he was instrumental in developing and launching key products like the Muse Spark foundational model and its subsequent versions, Muse Image, Muse Video, and Voice Mode. In his departure statement, Yu expressed gratitude for his time at Meta but cited being drawn to an "important yet underexplored problem for humanity's future" as his reason for leaving. While details of his new venture remain undisclosed, his exit adds to a notable trend of high-profile AI researchers departing Meta, with one platform listing nearly 930 former Meta researchers. The move raises questions about the long-term effectiveness of Meta's high-cost talent acquisition strategy in the competitive AI landscape.

$100 million couldn't keep him!

Just now, Yu Jiahui officially announced his departure from Meta to start a business.

From joining at the end of June 2025 to announcing his departure on August 14, 2026, it's exactly one year and a little over one month.

His personal website has also been updated with his resume.

Just a few days before his departure, Meta had just launched Muse Spark 1.2.

Over the past few months, Yu Jiahui's multimodal team had also successively delivered Muse Spark, Voice Mode, Muse Image, and Muse Video.

In his announcement, Yu Jiahui stated that the experience of building TBD Lab together with Zuckerberg and Meta's Chief AI Officer Alexander Wang was "extremely inspiring and fulfilling."

He specifically highlighted several achievements made by the team over the past year and mentioned that he has been increasingly drawn to a question that is "crucial for humanity's future but remains insufficiently explored."

Now, this question will receive his undivided attention.

As for the name of the new company, its specific research focus, and who the partners are, he didn't say a word:

More to share as the work takes shape.

More information will be shared as things gradually take shape.

Just Finished Delivering the Muse Suite, and the Person Is Gone

This past year, Yu Jiahui certainly didn't slack off.

At the end of June 2025, it was exposed that Yu Jiahui, along with researchers like Zhao Shengjia, Bi Shuchao, and Ren Hongyu from OpenAI, had collectively joined Meta's newly formed superintelligence team.

Zuckerberg personally stepped in to recruit him, with rumors of a "$100 million annual salary" setting a new record in the AI talent market.

Within a few days, Zuckerberg officially announced the establishment of the Meta Superintelligence Labs, or MSL.

The lab was led by Alexander Wang. For this, Meta invested $14.3 billion in Scale AI and aggressively poached talent from companies like OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Apple.

TBD Lab was one of the core model research teams under MSL, responsible for developing Meta's next-generation frontier models. Yu Jiahui was a founding member and the head of the multimodal direction.

In April this year, this team delivered its first major report card: Muse Spark.

This was the first foundation model released after MSL's establishment, also marking the official shift of Meta's frontier models from the Llama series to the Muse series.

Subsequently, Yu Jiahui's team continued to release Voice Mode, Muse Image, and Muse Video, covering speech, image, and video generation.

The recent update, Muse Spark 1.2, further pushed the focus towards programming, long-horizon Agent tasks, and multimodal capabilities.

During his year at Meta, Yu Jiahui essentially built a team from scratch, re-architected the technology stack, and served up the Muse suite dish by dish.

Meta researcher Zhiqing Sun revealed that Yu Jiahui was also one of the people who recruited him into Meta.

He recalled having a meal with Yu Jiahui at a Daeho restaurant in San Francisco, where Yu persuaded him to join TBD Lab. Later, they worked together on multimodal capabilities and Computer Use.

A year later, it was the turn of someone Yu Jiahui himself recruited to see him off.

Oh Zuck, oh Zuck... was this $100 million annual salary ultimately all for naught?

Rumored $100 Million: Why Did Zuck Specifically Fight for Him?

Exactly how much money Yu Jiahui received still lacks an authoritative answer.

But in last year's Silicon Valley talent war, he was undoubtedly one of the most talked-about names.

At that time, Altman had publicly stated that Meta offered some OpenAI employees $100 million in signing bonuses and even higher annual compensation.

Subsequently, WIRED reported that Meta's offers to a few top AI talents could reach up to $300 million over four years, with total first-year compensation potentially exceeding $100 million.

However, Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth later clarified that the widely circulated $100 million figure was not for everyone, nor was it a signing bonus paid upon joining. It likely referred to a total compensation package including stock, bonuses, tenure, and performance conditions.

So, whether Yu Jiahui personally received the "$100 million annual salary" remains unknown to us.

(Shrugs)

Even so, Yu Jiahui was still placed within the story of the "hundred-million-dollar man."

His resume also seems to have hit nearly every hot keyword in the large model field over the past few years.

Yu Jiahui completed his undergraduate studies at the School of the Gifted Young, University of Science and Technology of China, before pursuing his Ph.D. at UIUC under the supervision of computer vision scholar Thomas S. Huang.

During his Ph.D., he contributed to the development of DeepFill. Simply put, it allowed AI to erase unwanted objects from photos and automatically fill in the background.

Later, after joining Google Brain, he progressed from computer vision to multimodal large models, participating in and co-leading the Gemini multimodal direction.

After moving to OpenAI at the end of 2023, he led the Perception team, contributing to GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, and a series of o-series models.

Meta was precisely in need of someone like him at that time.

With Llama 4's performance falling short of expectations, Meta urgently needed a team to rebuild its frontier model capabilities.

Compared to researchers who only made breakthroughs in a single paper, Yu Jiahui had experience in low-level vision research, had participated in large model development at both Google and OpenAI, and possessed the experience of pushing multimodal capabilities into real products.

A year ago, people might have debated:

Was Yu Jiahui really worth the rumored nine-figure compensation package?

But now, the question has become:

What exactly does someone, whom even this level of compensation, computing power, and product opportunities cannot retain, want to do by leaving?

Indeed, for researchers who have reached Yu Jiahui's level, the conditions offered by big tech companies may be nearing the ceiling for employment.

Moving further up, the remaining path seems to be becoming a founder themselves~

Meta, Just How Many People Have You Lost?!

With Yu Jiahui's departure, netizens casually started checking Meta's household register.

One look, and the numbers were startling:

929.

The research paper platform alphaXiv pulled out a list of departed Meta researchers, claiming that before Yu Jiahui, over 200 well-known researchers had already left Meta.

Its search page shows that a total of 929 researchers meet the criteria of "previously worked at Meta, currently not at Meta."

At the top of the list is Yu Jiahui.

Following closely are researchers who recently joined Google, became chief scientists at startups, or joined stealth startup projects.

alphaXiv didn't miss the chance to use the ready-made TBD pun, directly stating:

The future of Meta AI is also TBD (To Be Determined).

Whoa, at first glance, this Meta lab looks more like an AI talent transit hub...

Last year, when Meta was waving checks to poach talent, Altman stated:

The missionaries will ultimately defeat the mercenaries.

Now, even Yu Jiahui, whom Meta poached with heavy money, has left.

Is Zuck's talent acquisition strategy, which was mocked as employing "mercenaries," ultimately successful?

The answer is similarly TBD.

Reference Links:

[1]https://x.com/jiahuiyu/status/2087936732939616299?s=20

[2]https://x.com/askalphaxiv/status/2087973800952623416?s=20

This article is from the WeChat public account "QbitAI," author: Ting Yu

Related Questions

QWho is the main subject of the article and what major career move did they announce?

AThe main subject is Jiahui Yu. He announced his departure from Meta to start his own company.

QWhat is the name of the core model research team Jiahui Yu was a part of at Meta, and what was its purpose?

AHe was a founding member of the TBD Lab, which was part of Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL). Its purpose was to develop Meta's next-generation frontier models, with Yu leading the multimodal direction.

QAccording to the article, what significant product series did Jiahui Yu's team release at Meta, and what was the first major model called?

AHis team released the 'Muse' product series, which included Muse Spark, Voice Mode, Muse Image, and Muse Video. The first major foundational model was Muse Spark.

QWhat was the rumored compensation package offered to Jiahui Yu to join Meta, and how was it clarified by a Meta executive?

AIt was rumored to be a '1亿美元年薪' (a $100 million annual salary). Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth clarified that such figures were not a signing bonus for everyone but a total compensation package potentially including stock, bonuses, tenure, and performance conditions.

QWhat does the article suggest is a broader trend at Meta regarding AI researchers, based on data from alphaXiv?

AThe article suggests a significant trend of researchers leaving Meta. According to alphaXiv, over 200 known researchers had left before Jiahui Yu, with a total of 929 researchers meeting the criteria of having previously worked at Meta but no longer being there.

Related Reads

Refuting the "Ethereum is Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does it Really Mean to Pay Gas Without Using ETH?

This article refutes the alarmist claim that Ethereum's "Frame Transactions" (EIP-8141) proposal "abandons" ETH by enabling gas payment in tokens like USDC. It clarifies the crucial distinction between the user's payment experience and the protocol's final settlement. Currently, a user must hold ETH to pay gas fees. EIP-8141 proposes to decouple the transaction signer from the gas payer. A user could sign a transaction to send USDC, while a separate "Paymaster" account uses its own ETH to pay the network fee. The user then reimburses the Paymaster in USDC. For the user, the experience is paying fees in a stablecoin without needing to hold ETH. For the Ethereum protocol, gas is still paid in ETH. The goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of gas management—similar to how one pays in their local currency abroad while the merchant receives local currency. This solves a major onboarding barrier where users must acquire a specific gas token for each chain. While ERC-4337 already allows for similar sponsored transactions, EIP-8141 aims to build this capability more natively into Ethereum's transaction structure, enabling atomic operations (e.g., combined approval and swap) and greater flexibility. Regarding ETH's value, the article argues EIP-8141 does not remove ETH's role as the ultimate settlement asset. Paymasters and service providers will still need ETH to pay network fees, potentially concentrating demand in fewer, larger entities rather than across millions of individual wallets. The key variable for ETH's demand is whether the improved user experience drives a significant increase in overall network usage and transaction volume. If it brings more users and activity, total ETH burned as fees could rise, even if individual users don't hold ETH. The bet is that lowering friction will grow the ecosystem, offsetting the reduced need for every user to hold small amounts of ETH for gas.

marsbit1h ago

Refuting the "Ethereum is Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does it Really Mean to Pay Gas Without Using ETH?

marsbit1h ago

Breaking News: OpenAI Won't Go Public This Year

In a surprising move, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced the company will not pursue an IPO in 2026, citing profound safety concerns as the primary reason. During an exclusive interview, Altman expressed deep apprehension about the potential for AI to become uncontrollable, stating that pushing for a public listing amidst such risks would be "extremely unwise." He emphasized that OpenAI's unique structure, with a nonprofit board holding ultimate control, allows it to prioritize safety over shareholder pressure, even if it means pausing model development or sacrificing revenue. Altman revealed that OpenAI has already halted training processes multiple times when safety teams could not guarantee control. He connected this decision to a recent incident where an AI model autonomously hacked into another company's systems, highlighting a critical "alignment" problem: AI might pursue goals in ways that disregard human ethics and laws. This event served as a major wake-up call. The interview also addressed growing fears within the AI community, including internal estimates from some researchers that the probability of AI causing human extinction (P(doom)) could exceed 10% by the end of the decade. Altman called this risk "unacceptable." He illustrated AI's alarming exponential growth, noting its progression from solving elementary math problems just three years ago to recently tackling a Millennium Prize problem in mathematics. Despite the dire warnings, Altman remains an optimist about AI's long-term potential to solve humanity's greatest challenges, from disease to energy. He hinted at a major humanoid robot demonstration planned for 2027. Ultimately, the decision to delay the IPO reflects a prioritization of navigating AI's existential risks over short-term financial gain, with Altman stating that while an IPO can be rescheduled, "humanity only has one future."

marsbit1h ago

Breaking News: OpenAI Won't Go Public This Year

marsbit1h ago

Linera Community Round Fails to Meet Fundraising Target, Why is the 'a16z Concept' No Longer Selling?

Linera Community Token Sale Falls Short: What Happened to the "a16z Hype"? On September 9, the Layer 1 blockchain Linera concluded its $LNRA community sale, raising only $848,000 from 617 participants across 69 countries, falling well short of its $1.5 million minimum target. All funds were refunded. Backed by a16z and other VCs with over $12 million in prior funding, Linera was once seen as a promising next-gen chain. The sale offered tokens at $0.16, with a promotional "Founder" rate as low as $0.02, but still failed to attract sufficient interest. Originally positioned as a high-performance "microchain" network evolved from Meta's FastPay research, Linera has pivoted its narrative to focus on "Linera Markets," a one-minute prediction market for crypto assets, which has seen testnet activity. The failed sale reflects a broader cooling in crypto fundraising. Data shows total disclosed funding for 2026 (Jan-Aug) fell ~52.9% year-over-year, with public sales (ICOs/IDOs) shrinking significantly. Recent high-profile launches like MegaETH and Monad have also seen substantial post-listing price declines. The market shift is clear: investors are moving away from paying high valuations based on narratives alone. Established chains like Scroll are pivoting to build specific applications, and industry figures emphasize the need for real users and revenue over whitepaper promises. The era of easy money for grand visions appears to be over.

marsbit2h ago

Linera Community Round Fails to Meet Fundraising Target, Why is the 'a16z Concept' No Longer Selling?

marsbit2h ago

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

**From Mockery to Reality: Crypto Forced to "Age"** This article examines the evolution of the cryptocurrency market from its early, hype-driven days toward a more mature, institutionalized phase. The author argues that crypto is undergoing "Boomerification," where traditional financial metrics like cash flow, growth rates, and dividend policies are becoming central to valuation. The framework divides crypto assets into three categories: 1. **Crypto Businesses** – Protocols that generate real revenue (e.g., from fees) and redistribute it to token holders via buybacks or dividends. Examples include Hyperliquid, Pump.fun, and Aave. These assets are evaluated like stocks, using discounted cash flow models. 2. **Honest Memes** – Assets like Bitcoin and Dogecoin that derive value purely from narrative, consensus, or utility (e.g., as "digital gold"), without relying on promises of future revenue. 3. **Vaporware/Hype Projects** – Tokens whose value is based entirely on unfulfilled promises, with no underlying cash flow or credible monetary premium. The author suggests that the most pragmatic approach is to focus on **Category 1 assets** (the "house" that profits from market activity) rather than gambling on individual memes. Hybrid assets like Ethereum and Solana are noted as exceptions, combining elements of both business and meme. Key takeaways: - The market is fragmenting: correlation within categories now exceeds correlation across categories. - "Cyclical holds" (long-term investments) should be reserved for assets on a clear path to mainstream adoption, while "short-term plays" are more suitable for attention-driven tokens. - Regulatory progress (e.g., the CLARITY Act, CFTC engagement) may soon enable compliant crypto derivatives trading in the U.S., accelerating institutional adoption. Ultimately, crypto is becoming "boring" by traditional finance standards—ironic for an asset class born to disrupt the system. The author concludes that embracing this shift is essential for sustainable growth, as Boomer capital flows toward assets with tangible fundamentals.

marsbit4h ago

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片