HSBC Research Report Analysis: Behind 12 Million Starlink Users, the Space Economy is Feeding Back to Earth

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-20Last updated on 2026-08-20

Abstract

HSBC Research Report Analysis: The 120 Million Starlink Users and How the Space Economy is Fueling Earth's Industries. The core value of the new space race is returning to Earth, driving industrial upgrades across multiple sectors, according to an HSBC report covering 12 industries. Key developments include: SpaceX’s Starlink has surpassed a critical scale with 10,200 satellites, 12 million broadband users, and 7.4 million direct-to-cell devices. It is evolving from a backup solution to default infrastructure in maritime, aviation, trucking, and remote areas, complementing rather than competing with terrestrial telecom operators. Starship aims to reduce launch costs to $100-$300 per kilogram, a 95%+ reduction from historical averages. This drastic cost compression is reshaping the economics of satellite manufacturing, in-orbit services, and future ventures like asteroid mining. SpaceX’s plans for orbital AI data centers (100 GW by 2040) and the Terafab vertically integrated semiconductor foundry (a joint venture with Tesla and xAI) represent strategic shifts. While orbital data center costs are currently triple those on Earth, they offer a policy-independent backup for power-constrained AI growth. Terafab poses a potential challenge to the traditional fabless-foundry model. The report warns that aggressive capacity expansion by SpaceX and others could lead to a compute surplus by the late 2020s, potentially commoditizing LLMs and pressuring hardware vendors. The space ra...

Written by: Rita

The greatest value of the space race is returning to Earth. On August 18, HSBC released a report spanning 12 industries, unpacking this transmission chain one by one.

Asteroid mining and orbital data centers are not yet operational. Yet, the space race has already rewritten the competitive logic of communications, semiconductors, power, and robotics. Led by Raj Sinha, Co-Head of Global Equity Research at HSBC, this report covers 12 sectors including telecommunications, semiconductors, power, industrials, agriculture, insurance, and finance.

SpaceX has raised $75 billion. Elon Musk's compensation is tied to the company's $7.5 trillion market capitalization target and Mars colonization. HSBC's conclusion is: the most urgent value of the space economy is its role in driving the upgrading of Earth's industries.

Starlink Has Crossed the Critical Point of Scale

As of June 30, 2026, SpaceX's satellite internet service had 10,200 satellites in orbit and 12 million broadband subscribers, covering 167 markets. An additional 7.4 million monthly active devices are connected via satellite-to-phone (Direct to Cell), covering 30 countries. HSBC telecommunications analysts note that these numbers mean space-based communication has become infrastructure for multiple industries, far beyond an alternative for remote areas.

Maersk has installed Starlink on over 330 container ships, and United Airlines plans to equip 15 Boeing 737-800 aircraft per month. EpicVue has launched a Starlink solution for truck fleets at $99 per month with 250GB of data, covering 99.9% of US and Canadian territory. Satellite connectivity is shifting from an emergency backup to a default configuration.

HSBC assesses that the relationship between Starlink and terrestrial telecom operators is primarily complementary. The performance and cost advantages of fiber and 5G in dense urban areas are unshakeable. In maritime, desert, mountainous, and post-disaster scenarios, satellite connections fill the coverage gaps left by cellular networks. For telecom operators, cooperation is better than confrontation. T-Mobile, KDDI, and Airtel Africa have all signed direct-to-device cooperation agreements with Starlink.

Starship Reduces Launch Cost to $300 Per Kilogram

SpaceX's core advantage lies in cost.

Falcon 9's low-Earth orbit launch cost is $2,940 per kilogram, and Falcon Heavy's is $1,520. Starship aims to reduce this to $100-300, a drop of over 95% compared to the historical average (approximately $18,500/kg from 1970 to 2000).

Falling costs are rewriting the fundamental assumptions of the space economy. Material choices for satellite manufacturing, energy solutions for orbital data centers, and feasibility models for asteroid mining all need reassessment. HSBC industrial analysts point out that SpaceX manufactures about 80-85% of its rocket and spacecraft components internally, achieving a high degree of vertical integration. This compresses the space for external suppliers, keeping the benefits of lower launch costs within the company.

A single V2 Starlink satellite costs $1 million, with a launch cost of $2-3 million. One Starship can launch 60 V3 satellites at once, each with a downlink capacity of about 1 Tbps, which is 20 times that of the V2.

Scale and cost are forming a positive feedback loop.

Orbital Data Centers Are a Backup Option for Computing Power

SpaceX plans to deploy 100 GW of orbital AI data center computing power by 2040, with trial launches starting in 2027.

HSBC estimates that the cost of orbital data centers is currently three times that of terrestrial ones and may only converge by 2035-2040. Terrestrial data centers remain the priority choice. Orbital data centers are a strategic reserve. If the US power grid and nuclear power construction cannot keep up with computing demand, space can provide an option bypassing policy, land, and environmental constraints.

The Terafab plan is closer to reality than orbital data centers. A joint venture between SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI plans to build a vertically integrated wafer fab covering the entire chain from design, manufacturing, packaging, to testing. If successful, it could disrupt the horizontal division of labor in the semiconductor industry. The chain of NVIDIA designing chips, TSMC manufacturing, and third-party packaging/testing could be replaced by a one-stop solution.

The cost gap is just a surface-level issue; computing power surplus is the bigger risk. HSBC estimates that the global annual incremental demand for AI data center power by 2030 is below 50 GW, while SpaceX's orbital plan alone targets an annual addition of 100 GW. If terrestrial manufacturers continue expanding at the current pace (HSBC expects annual capital expenditure to exceed $1 trillion from 2027), the market could face a computing power surplus within five years. The asset turnover and return on investment for GPU cloud infrastructure are already under pressure, and SpaceX's entry will intensify this trend.

Another consequence of computing power surplus is the commoditization of LLM models. With computing power no longer scarce, performance gaps between models shrink. Hardware suppliers face pressure, while software and application layers benefit.

The Space Race is Reshaping Three Core Industries

The report covers 12 industries. HSBC analysts judge that the power, semiconductor, and robotics sectors are being directly rewritten by the space race.

The power sector benefits most directly. AI data centers have pushed the US annual electricity demand growth rate from 2-3% to 4-5%. If the computing power race continues, both US and European electricity demand could grow 2.8 times by 2050 (previous expectations were 60% and 80% respectively). HSBC utilities analysts conclude that renewable energy and the power grid are the "clearest winners." Nuclear and natural gas face uncertainty: terrestrial data centers are a boon, but orbital data centers could act as substitutes.

The semiconductor sector faces a dual impact. Orbital inference requires "low-Earth orbit optimized silicon," a new performance tier between consumer-grade chips and radiation-hardened aerospace chips, which will create new demand. If the Terafab model is replicated by other giants, traditional wafer foundries could face order loss.

The logic for robotics and industrials is the most straightforward. Asteroid mining relies on highly autonomous robots, lunar base construction requires engineering machinery, and in-orbit servicing needs robotic arms. Caterpillar has partnered with NASA to develop lunar excavation technology, with its autonomous mining experience on Earth directly transferable to space scenarios. Honeywell provides navigation systems for NASA's Artemis missions; aerospace technology can similarly feed back into aviation and industrial fields.

The other 9 industries also appear in HSBC's framework, including telecommunications, agriculture, chemicals, metals & mining, healthcare, insurance, finance, transportation & logistics, and tech platforms. However, the transmission chains are longer, and the short-term impact is less direct than in the three sectors above.

The takeoff of the space economy doesn't need to wait for asteroid mining or Mars colonization. Starlink's 12 million users, Starship's cost curve, and Terafab's potential impact on the semiconductor landscape are already proof.

The core judgment of the HSBC report is: space is an accelerator for Earth's industries. Computing power continues to expand, electricity demand doubles, and launch costs drop below $300 per kilogram. Three curves are simultaneously approaching historical inflection points. The first to be reshaped is always the link with the shortest transmission chain.

Disclaimer

This article is Tide Research's compilation and interpretation of a third-party brokerage research report (HSBC, August 18, 2026), combined with public market information. The ratings, target prices, earnings forecasts, and related judgments cited herein are the views of the brokerage's analysts, representing only the position of their institution, and do not represent Tide Research's views, nor do they constitute any investment advice.

The market carries risks; decisions must be made independently. This article should not be used as a basis for buying or selling any securities.

Related Questions

QAccording to the HSBC report, what is the most urgent value of the space economy for Earth's industries?

AThe report concludes that the most urgent value of the space economy is that it is driving the upgrade and transformation of Earth's industries, acting as an accelerator rather than waiting for distant goals like asteroid mining.

QHow has Starlink's role evolved based on its current scale, and what is its relationship with terrestrial telecom operators?

AWith 12 million broadband users and coverage in 167 markets, Starlink has moved beyond being a backup for remote areas to become default infrastructure in sectors like maritime and logistics. HSBC judges its relationship with terrestrial operators as primarily complementary, with partnerships (e.g., with T-Mobile) being more beneficial than competition, as satellites fill coverage gaps.

QWhat is the target launch cost per kilogram for SpaceX's Starship, and how does this cost reduction impact the space economy?

AStarship aims to reduce launch costs to $100-$300 per kilogram. This drastic reduction of over 95% compared to historical averages is rewriting the fundamental assumptions of the space economy, forcing re-evaluation of feasibility models for satellite manufacturing, orbital data centers, and asteroid mining.

QWhat are the three core industries that the HSBC report identifies as being most directly reshaped by the space race?

AThe three core industries most directly reshaped are: 1) Power/Utilities, due to surging demand from AI data centers; 2) Semiconductors, facing new demand for 'low-orbit optimized silicon' and potential disruption from vertically integrated models like Terafab; and 3) Robotics & Industrial, as technologies for space mining and construction are developed and can be applied on Earth.

QWhat potential risk does the HSBC report highlight regarding the expansion of AI computing power, particularly in relation to SpaceX's plans?

AThe report highlights a risk of computing power oversupply. HSBC estimates global annual AI data center demand will be below 50GW by 2030, but SpaceX alone plans to deploy 100GW of orbital AI compute capacity annually. If ground-based manufacturers also expand aggressively, the market could face a supply glut within five years, pressuring returns and potentially leading to the commoditization of large language models (LLMs).

Related Reads

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

**Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence** Artificial intelligence (AI) is an era filled with paradoxes, which we navigate as we advance. **1. The Prediction Paradox** AI experts, from pioneers like Marvin Minsky to contemporary figures like Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis, have a history of inaccurate forecasts regarding AI's capabilities and timelines, such as achieving human-level machine intelligence or surpassing radiologists. Predictions about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) vary wildly between optimistic entrepreneurs and skeptical academics, highlighting the inherent unpredictability of technological futures. **2. The Employment Quantification Paradox** Despite numerous studies from institutions like the OECD, IMF, and McKinsey attempting to quantify AI's impact on jobs, estimates of affected employment range from 0.4% to 67%, revealing vast inconsistencies. This paradox arises because isolating AI's effect from other economic, social, and technological factors is virtually impossible, and forecasts depend on static assumptions about a dynamically evolving technology. **3. The Productivity Paradox** While AI is a transformative General Purpose Technology, significant productivity growth has not yet materialized in major economies like the EU and has only matched historical averages in the US. This disconnect between rapid innovation and slow productivity gains, reminiscent of the "Solow Paradox" from the computer age, is often explained by time lags. History shows it takes decades for such technologies to diffuse and trigger complementary innovations that boost productivity. **4. The Data Value Paradox** Data is hailed as the "new oil" and critical for AI, yet its economic value is paradoxical. Its worth is realized only in use, not in straightforward trade. Despite policy emphasis and initiatives for data asset recognition on corporate balance sheets in China, the monetized value remains negligible—accounting for only about 0.06% of major telecom operators' total assets—highlighting the gap between perceived utility and financial valuation. **5. The Industrial Revolution Paradox** For decades, nearly every major new technology, from the internet and nanotechnology to blockchain and now AI, has been proclaimed as the driver of a "Fourth Industrial Revolution." This constant reassignment suggests prior labels were premature. True industrial revolutions are typically identified in hindsight, not in real-time. Furthermore, the coexistence of such a proclaimed transformative revolution with ongoing economic crises would be historically anomalous. Whether AI truly defines a new industrial revolution remains a narrative for the future to decide.

marsbit2m ago

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

marsbit2m ago

Experts Warn of Mass Crypto Hacks Using AI Agents

Experts warn that AI agents could dramatically lower the cost and scale of attacks against cryptocurrency holders. Speaking at the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium, industry figures noted that automation allows malicious actors to simultaneously search for vulnerabilities in wallets, passwords, and networks across a vast number of potential victims. Ryan Kirkly, co-founder and CEO of Global Settlement Network, criticized the industry for often viewing autonomous agents only as beneficial tools while underestimating their offensive potential. Data from TRM Labs shows the crypto industry experienced a record 207 hacks in the first half of 2026, causing $972 million in losses, with the number doubling from the same period in 2025. Vice President of Technical Operations at Web3 Foundation, Bill Labun, agreed that the efficiency of autonomous systems also benefits attackers. While defenders like the Ethereum Foundation are using AI agents for security audits, the need for human verification remains high due to false positives. A major concern is granting AI agents direct access to financial tools and personal data. New services like MetaMask's Agent Wallet, which allows AI to manage assets within set limits, introduce risks such as prompt injection attacks. Panelists also highlighted risks from metadata leakage, which can compromise privacy even on private networks, and the unresolved issue of legal liability for an AI agent's autonomous and potentially irreversible actions. Lack of user trust, due to AI's tendency to "hallucinate" or generate incorrect information, was cited as a key barrier to widespread adoption.

cryptonews.ru3m ago

Experts Warn of Mass Crypto Hacks Using AI Agents

cryptonews.ru3m ago

American economic magazine Forbes stated that bitcoin could become a neutral reserve asset for the global economy!

American business and economic magazine Forbes has suggested that Bitcoin could potentially play a significant role as a neutral reserve asset in the global financial system. According to the publication, Bitcoin might offer an alternative to the growing debates surrounding the US dollar's status as the world's reserve currency and the current system's reliance on US government bonds. Forbes notes that the dollar's reserve status grants the US significant advantages but also highlights the inherent "Triffin dilemma," where the US struggles to balance its domestic economic needs with global demand for the reserve currency. The current system draws global capital to the US, allowing for cheaper imports but weakening domestic competitiveness and worsening the trade deficit. The post-gold standard system has been sustained by US bonds, yet fundamental contradictions remain. The magazine argues that stablecoins cannot fully address the reserve asset issue as they are largely backed by US Treasuries. While gold is a neutral reserve asset, it has limitations regarding mobility, verification, and transactional efficiency. In contrast, Bitcoin, with its fixed supply, lack of need for state credit guarantees, and ease of global verification and transfer, is presented as a potential next-generation neutral reserve asset. Forbes states that while the US dollar will continue to be used in international trade, Bitcoin could eventually assume the reserve asset role, reducing the global economy's dependence on any single country's debt instruments. The article also acknowledges that hurdles like price volatility and limited institutional adoption must be overcome. *This is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ru4m ago

American economic magazine Forbes stated that bitcoin could become a neutral reserve asset for the global economy!

cryptonews.ru4m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片