Is the Sharp Decline Over? Let the Data Speak

foresightnews_apiPublished on 2026-06-05Last updated on 2026-06-05

Abstract

**Has the Sharp Decline Ended? Let Data Speak** Bitcoin's recent significant drop has placed short sellers in a precarious position. Three concurrent pressures—sustained outflows from ETFs, miners offloading coins to exchanges, and short-term holders capitulating—pushed the price near $63k. The asset fell 13% this week and 21% this month, roughly halving from its all-time high. A critical data point is the extremely crowded short positioning, with a short-to-long ratio reaching 8:1, representing nearly $100 billion in short interest overhead. This creates conditions for a potential short squeeze if selling pressure merely pauses, similar to the event in November 2022 which triggered a 24% rally. The selling pressures are real: spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen a record $5.4 billion outflow over 20 days. Short-term holders moved 53k loss-held BTC to exchanges in a day, and miners sent 24k BTC to Binance, a six-month high. Capital is also rotating towards AI and tech stocks like SpaceX, with $400 billion invested in AI infrastructure recently. However, on-chain data shows accumulation by long-term holders, who added 200k BTC in a month, and institutions/miners have absorbed 1.24 million BTC since 2023. This indicates strong buying beneath the surface. Key levels to watch are the $67k-$70k zone (2021 high & 2024 breakout point). A swift recovery above it suggests a leverage washout; failure could test $60k-$55k. The direction also hinges on ETF flow reversal. Currently, the S&P 5...


Written by: Blockchain Knight


Bitcoin has taken a significant hit in this wave of decline, but the short sellers have also pushed themselves into an awkward position.


With ETF funds continuously flowing out, miners dumping coins onto exchanges, and short-term players capitulating, these three forces exerted simultaneous pressure, pushing the price down to around $63,000.


It fell 13% over the past week and 21% over the past month, nearly halving from its all-time high.


Interestingly, the shorts got overly excited during this decline. The current short-to-long ratio in the market is as high as 8-to-1, with nearly a hundred billion dollars in short positions piled up overhead. What does this mean?


If the selling pressure stops just for a moment, even a brief pause, those betting on a decline will be forced to buy back to cover their positions, triggering a mechanical short squeeze.


A similar structure appeared in November 2022, and Bitcoin subsequently rose by 24% within two weeks.


Of course, the reasons for the sell-off are substantial. Spot ETFs have been experiencing continuous outflows, losing $5.4 billion over 20 days, setting a short-term record.


Short-term holders transferred 53,000 bitcoins at a loss directly to exchanges within a single day. Miners sent 24,000 bitcoins to Binance (BN), a half-year high.


Meanwhile, AI-related tech stocks remain highly attractive for capital. The capital market has poured $400 billion into AI infrastructure over the past six months. Institutions are rebalancing, pulling funds from Bitcoin ETFs to chase big trends like SpaceX and Anthropic.


On the other hand, data shows veterans are also buying the dip. Long-term holders have accumulated an additional 200,000 bitcoins over the past month, bringing their total holdings close to a historical peak.


Institutions and mining companies have absorbed 1.24 million bitcoins since 2023, roughly equivalent to the total amount held by Satoshi Nakamoto. Yet the price remains suppressed, indicating that selling pressure is indeed strong, but buyers are genuinely stepping in.


The key now lies in two things. One is the zone between $67,000 and $70,000—this was the 2021 peak and the 2024 breakout level. A swift recovery above this zone would suggest this was merely a leverage flush-out; failure to reclaim it would test levels around $60,000 or even $55,000.


The other is the flow of ETF funds. The marginal buyer for Bitcoin now is the ETF channel. If capital continues to flow to new targets like AI and SpaceX, Bitcoin will struggle to take off alone.


The market is clearly diverging: the S&P 500 continues to hit new highs driven by AI, while Bitcoin is taking a beating on its own. DeFi hasn't helped either, with the total value locked dropping from $173 billion to $73.9 billion. The engine of retail speculation has basically stalled.


If Bitcoin can establish a bottom in the $60,000 to $58,000 region, ETF outflows may persist for a while, AI will continue to attract capital, and the price will repeatedly test support. A crash is unlikely, but the rebound will be painfully slow.


There's also a lower-probability scenario where fund flows suddenly reverse, Bitcoin recaptures $70,000 with significant volume, short sellers are forced to cover in a stampede, and the price quickly rebounds above $76,000.


It must be said that the current spot selling pressure is real. However, short positions have become quite crowded. Who wins in the short term depends on when the selling pauses. Even a mere pause will cause this compressed spring to snap back.


But there's another issue worth caution: Can US stocks remain perpetrally bullish? If the US stock market experiences a temporary pullback, how will Bitcoin react? Will it once again miss the rally but be quick to join the sell-off?

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what are the three main sources of pressure that drove the Bitcoin price to around $63,000?

AThe three main sources of pressure are continuous outflows from ETF funds, miners selling coins on exchanges, and short-term traders liquidating their holdings.

QWhat is the significance of the current market long/short ratio mentioned in the article, and what potential outcome could it lead to?

AThe market long/short ratio is mentioned to be as high as 8:1, with nearly a hundred billion dollars in short positions. This high concentration of short positions makes the market vulnerable to a short squeeze, where a pause in selling pressure could force these short sellers to buy back Bitcoin to cover their positions, triggering a mechanical, sharp upward price movement.

QThe article contrasts the selling pressure with buying activity from another group. Who are these buyers, and what data is cited to support their activity?

AThe buyers are experienced or long-term holders. The article cites that long-term holders have increased their holdings by 200,000 Bitcoins in one month, bringing their total holdings close to an all-time high. Additionally, institutions and mining companies have accumulated 1.24 million Bitcoins since 2023.

QWhat are the two key technical or market factors the article identifies as crucial for determining Bitcoin's next price movement?

AThe two key factors are: 1) Whether Bitcoin can quickly reclaim the price range between $67,000 and $70,000, which represents the 2021 peak and 2024 breakout point. 2) The future direction of ETF fund flows, as the ETF channel is considered a marginal buyer for Bitcoin.

QWhat potential future scenario does the article suggest if the US stock market experiences a pullback, and how might Bitcoin react according to the author's implied concern?

AThe article raises a concern that if the US stock market experiences a short-term pullback, Bitcoin might not have benefited from the stock market's previous gains ('missed out on the feast') but could still be negatively impacted by the downturn ('gets hit when the beatings come'), suggesting it could fall alongside or potentially more than traditional markets.

Related Reads

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1h ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1h ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit1h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片