为什么BTC会在下个周期被ETH超越?

深潮TechFlowPublished on 2023-01-12Last updated on 2023-01-12

Abstract

比特币的目标是成为全球储备货币,以太坊的目标是成为全球数字经济的基础设施。然而这两者的市场价值是不一样的,本文将分析BTC市值被ETH超越的原因。

也许 ETH 超越 BTC 比想象中的来得更早。

”“

比特币的目标是成为全球储备货币,以太坊的目标是成为全球数字经济的基础设施。这两个愿景都是巨大的,所以比较网络获得各自市场份额的可能性会更好。

”“

相对于其安全预算,比特币从未产生过有意义的交易收入,而是用区块奖励来大量补贴安全。目前的模式是不可持续的,削弱了其成为全球储备货币的可能性。

”“

以太坊已经成为最大的 dApp 生态系统的基础层,并拥有加密货币中最好的经济系统。

”“

该网络目前拥有:246 亿美元的 DeFi TVL;847 亿美元的稳定币。

”“

在 2022 年,它促成了超过:1.2T 美元的 DEX 现货交易量;526 亿美元的 NFT 交易量。

”“

预计以太坊将在下一个周期结束前超过比特币。以太坊的市值落后大约 $1500 亿,但合并后的出色表现将成为 ETH 基本面的一个有实力的推动力。

如果只看矿工收入的美元价值,比特币似乎做得更好。

”“

自 2016 年以来,矿工年收入一直呈上升趋势。

”“

但分析一下收入构成,就会发现背后的问题......比特币通过区块奖励大量补贴安全性。95%的比特币矿工奖励来自通货膨胀的区块奖励,而只有 5%是来自交易费的真实收入

PoW 在设计上会消耗大量能源。这对安全来说是很好的,但它创造了强制卖家,因为矿工需要抵消他们的生产成本(电力)。即使通货膨胀率较低,95% 的矿工销售都是新铸造的 BTC,因为几乎没有产生费用。

”“

比特币不支持智能合约,所以 BTC 是网络上唯一可以存在的价值形式。用户必须在每笔交易中支付费用来转移 BTC。因此,费用产生依赖于 BTC 的流通速度,但用户却自称是囤币者……

”“

相比之下,ETH 是作为货币在数字经济中进行交易的。用户支付 ETH 来转移 ETH、稳定币和其他代币,或与 DeFi 应用程序互动。以太坊扩展了可能的行动,不仅仅是发送、接收和持有 BTC。

”“

在牛市期间,以太坊的真实收益百分比与总收入一起增加,凸显了网络的反身性。然而,当链上活动减少时,反身性就会受到伤害,这从 2022 年真实收益百分比的回撤可以看出。

”“

将 2022 年分为合并前和合并后的时代,显示了以太坊如何通过验证者收入的多样化来解决通货膨胀问题。合并后,以太坊验证者从交易费、ETH 燃烧和 MEV 支付中获得 62%的实际收入。

ETH 燃烧和 MEV 也与链上活动的水平相关。更多的交易量导致了更高的基础费用燃烧和更多的 MEV 机会。然而,在熊市,以太坊的净发行量近乎为零,并为质押者创造了正价值。

”“

迁移到 PoS 也导致在短短 117 天内减少 17 亿美元的 ETH 排放量。这对流动性流动来说是很重要的,因为 ETH 需要更少的购买压力来维持相同的价格。对通胀的影响?ETH 的 30 天年化通胀率高达 0.00%。

”“

同样,比特币并没有死。它在 2021-2022 年被个人、上市公司和国家/地区广泛采用。它的社区可能会在不久的将来努力优先考虑可持续性,但它目前的发展轨迹将导致它相对于以太坊而言滞后。

Related Reads

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Access to Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal On June 12th, the U.S. government ordered AI company Anthropic to immediately suspend all foreign access—including foreign nationals within the U.S. and Anthropic's own foreign employees—to its newly released Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models, citing national security concerns. This forced Anthropic to temporarily disable access to both models for all users globally, as it cannot technically differentiate user nationality at scale. The models, released just three days prior, represent Anthropic's highest public capability tier. Fable 5 is the first publicly available model from the advanced "Mythos" family, while Mythos 5 is a less-restricted version for approved cybersecurity and critical infrastructure partners. The government's directive was reportedly triggered by claims from another company that it could "jailbreak" Mythos 5, raising alarm within the Trump administration. Anthropic, in a detailed public statement, strongly challenged this rationale. The company argues the demonstrated "jailbreak" is a narrow, non-generalized technique that merely involves identifying minor, known software vulnerabilities—a capability common to other publicly available models like OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and routinely used by cybersecurity defenders. Anthropic stated it has complied with the order but disagrees with the government's standard, warning that applying it industry-wide would halt all new frontier model deployments. The company criticized the lack of a transparent, fact-based legal process and expressed confidence the situation stems from a misunderstanding. It is working to restore access and will release more technical details within 24 hours. Other Anthropic models remain unaffected.

链捕手10m ago

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

链捕手10m ago

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

**Raydium Exploit Reveals DeFi's Hidden Risk: Forgotten "Zombie" Contracts** A recent attack on Raydium's deprecated V3 AMM pools resulted in a loss of approximately $1.34 million. The hacker exploited pools that were no longer supported by Raydium's current UI or SDK but remained fully functional and accessible on-chain. This incident highlights a critical, often overlooked category of risk in DeFi: inactive or legacy smart contracts that projects fail to properly decommission. Since March 2025, there have been at least 8 publicly reported attacks targeting such abandoned contracts, with total losses around $10.8 million. Including older pools and deprecated features, the count rises to 10 incidents with roughly $22.5 million in losses. These "zombie contracts" represent a lifecycle management failure rather than a code vulnerability, yet they are typically misclassified under general "code bug" categories in security reports, masking the true scale of the problem. The root cause is that projects often merely document a contract as "deprecated" without taking essential technical steps to secure it: withdrawing remaining assets, disabling external call functions, and implementing ongoing monitoring. These forgotten, under-monitored components become prime targets for attackers. To address this, the industry needs to recognize "zombie contracts" as a distinct risk category and establish standardized decommissioning protocols. Essential steps should include: 1) a formal retirement announcement, 2) removal of all front-end integrations, 3) withdrawal of locked assets, 4) disabling key contract functions, 5) ongoing security monitoring, 6) clear user communication, and 7) a post-mortem analysis. The value of a DeFi project lies not only in its current TVL but also in the security of its historical codebase, which has now become a new attack surface.

Foresight News1h ago

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

Foresight News1h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit4h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片