稳定币持有量分析:聪明钱对后市怎么看?

深潮TechFlowPublished on 2022-12-09Last updated on 2022-12-12

Abstract

投资最基本的法则:跟着钱走。稳定币是加密货币的命脉,让我们来看看,这些命脉都流向了哪里?

投资最基本的法则:跟着钱走。稳定币是加密货币的命脉,让我们来看看,这些命脉都流向了哪里?

记住投资最基本的黄金法则之一:"跟着钱走"。

稳定币是加密货币的命脉,让我们来看看,这些命脉都流向了哪里?

TL;DR:

最近,11 月出现了有史以来最高的链上交易量,稳定币从交易所流出,聪明钱继续保持高度持有稳定币,但他们持有的热门稳定币 USDT、USDC 和 BUSD 均有所下降。

首先,我们先来看看:交易所的稳定币流。

我们可以看到,自 11 月 4 日以来,交易所的稳定币余额急剧下降。大约价值 40 亿美元。这与 FTX 的崩溃和恐慌相吻合。人们急于把他们的加密货币从交易所转移出去。

接下来,让我们看看聪明钱持有多少稳定币。

思路是:

稳定币多=看跌

稳定币少=看涨

我们可以看到,与去年同期相比,聪明钱的稳定币的持仓大大增加,表明目前的风险偏好较低。

查看稳定币每日链上交易量:

我们可以看到,11 月是有史以来交易量最高的一个月,其中大部分交易量来自 USDC,链上交易量为 585,518,197,775 美元

这可能也要归咎于 FTX 带来的恐慌。

接下来,我们看一下目前最著名的 4 个稳定币的历史代币持有量:$USDT、$USDC、$BUSD 和 $DAI

让我们看看聪明钱更喜欢什么,他们持有什么:

自 9 月以来,聪明钱持有的$USDT 的数量一直在缓慢流失。

聪明钱持有的 USDC 一直在逐步增加,直到 9 月份才下跌,此后一直在下降。

接下来,让我们来看看 Binance 的后起之秀$BUSD,我们可以看到它在 11 月初出现了一个巨大的飙升,目前这个拉升已经大幅回撤。

最后,我们可以看到,自夏天以来,聪明钱持有$DAI 的数量正在逐渐增加,尽管它仍然低于熊市之初的水平。

总之,如果你要努力寻找并跟随趋势,分析稳定币的流动对识别和保持市场趋势的正确性非常有帮助。

当聪明钱大量持仓稳定币时,你可能要考虑市场风险,当他们从稳定币里转移出来时,你可能要考虑做同样的事情。

稳定币持有量减少通常被认为是看涨的,然而鉴于目前加密货币领域的大环境(FTX ),可以推断恐惧和不确定性促成了当前稳定币持有量的下降。

Related Reads

Cryptomarket Loses $14 Billion Due to Hacks. What Was Special About 2026?

The cryptocurrency market lost over $14 billion due to hacks and code exploits from 2016 to 2026, according to a CoinGecko report. The year 2026 has seen a significant spike, with 164 separate incidents recorded as of August—a 70% increase from all of 2025. Although the total financial loss for 2026 currently stands at about $1.2 billion, still below the peak of $2.77 billion in 2022, the number of attacks is unprecedented. Analysts attribute this rise to improved tracking methods and increased malicious activity, possibly fueled by advancements in artificial intelligence. Notable 2026 breaches include the April hacks of Drift and Kelp protocols, resulting in losses of $295 million and $293 million, respectively. The Kelp exploit, linked to North Korean hackers, involved minting unbacked tokens via a LayerZero bridge vulnerability, which were then used as collateral on Aave. This triggered a massive withdrawal of liquidity from Aave and the broader DeFi sector, leading to over $20 billion in sector-wide outflows by August, despite the eventual recovery of the stolen Kelp funds. The report also highlights that market reactions to hacks often inflict greater financial damage than the exploits themselves. For instance, following the BonkDAO hack, the token's market cap fell by nearly $140 million, far exceeding the $21 million direct loss. Other examples include the DRIFT token dropping 80% and Step Finance's token losing over 99% of its value, leading to the protocol's bankruptcy. The analysis notes that the real total damage is likely higher, as it excludes individual wallet breaches and broader ecosystem losses.

cryptonews.ru3m ago

Cryptomarket Loses $14 Billion Due to Hacks. What Was Special About 2026?

cryptonews.ru3m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片