孙宇晨出席Huobi品牌升级发布会 提三大战略助其重返三大

区块链日报Published on 2022-11-22Last updated on 2022-11-23

Abstract

11月22日,波场TRON创始人,Huobi Global全球顾问委员会成员,格林纳达常驻世界贸易组织(WTO)代表、特命全权大使出席在新加坡举办的Huobi品牌升级发布会。

11月22日,波场TRON创始人,Huobi Global全球顾问委员会成员,格林纳达常驻世界贸易组织(WTO)代表、特命全权大使出席在新加坡举办的Huobi品牌升级发布会。孙宇晨为Huobi的未来发展提出三大战略:全球化发展、科技推动发展和科技向善,并将和其他顾问委员一起全力支持Huobi发展,助其重返行业前三,并与行业一起共建全球Web3.0门户。

火币将采用新的品牌“火必”,并在行业领军人物、全球委员会顾问孙宇晨的建言指导下,实现强强联合,开启火必新的发展阶段。更重要的是,在行业陷入低谷时期,起到重建信心、凝聚共识的作用。

根据发布会上公布的消息,火币中文品牌升级成为“火必”,Huobi Global英文品牌则升级为“Huobi”。孙宇晨表示,”除了虚拟资产交易平台之外,Huobi还代表着安全、便利和友好,缩短后的名称将更充分地体现这一点”。

由两个汉字 “火 “和 “必 “组成的火必新品牌具有强烈的中国特色和美好寓意。“火”字在中国文化中代表着永久的生命力和将这种生命力传递给后代。 “必 “字意味着必胜的决心,这代表了其重返行业前三名的雄心。

“必 “字也可以看作是 “心 “和 “义 “的组合。”心 “和 “义 “意味着新的Huobi将从心出发,为全球用户提供专业的数字资产管理服务。这也反映在其使命中,即 “加强资产安全,促进金融普惠”。

同时,新名称也秉承了中国传统的 “义 “的美德,贯彻了 “科技向善 “的品牌理念,为全球区块链和虚拟资产技术的创新和发展做出了贡献,实现了火必”科技改变世界 “的愿景。

今年10月10日,孙宇晨被任命为Huobi Global全球顾问委员会成员,他在个人社交账号表示,将和其他委员一起,在行业发展、学术研究、合规风控等领域提供指导,进一步加强机构间合作,提升品牌影响力和市场竞争力,获得更多用户认可,引领火必进入崭新的里程碑。2017年9月,孙宇晨创立了波场TRON,并迅速发展成为全球三大公链之一。2021年12月孙宇晨被任命为格林纳达常驻WTO代表、特命全权大使。

品牌发布会公布了火必未来三大发展战略,包括全球化发展、科技推动发展和科技向善。孙宇晨此前在接受媒体采访时也曾表示,将大力赋能HT,发挥HT的重要战略属性,将会把HT投票上币的权力重新交还给用户社区。

另外,火必将专注于优质资产,支持具有强大市场潜力的项目,并为项目社区提供支持。本着科技向善的理念,火必将努力为用户参与优质项目提供一个更安全、稳定的环境,推动全球虚拟资产行业的稳步发展。

此外,火必将全面推进全球化战略。今年10月7日,加勒比地区国家多米尼克与波场TRON达成一系列合作,开创了区块链企业与主权国家开展深度合作的先河。根据孙宇晨提出的建议,火必也将进军加勒比地区,并有可能将总部迁移到该地区。与此同时,火必还将在东南亚、欧洲和其它地区扩大投资,建立起强大的全球生态,并继续遵守各地区的监管政策,加强与其它国家的合作。

孙宇晨指出,作为一家成功运营了9年的虚拟资产交易平台,火币已经成为了行业里家喻户晓的名字,“随着品牌的更新,新路线图的推出和全球顾问委员会的指导,我相信火必可以加强其市场领导地位,重返三大”。

Related Reads

Open Systems Will Ultimately Prevail: Why Ethereum Is the Next Linux?

The article "Open Systems Will Ultimately Prevail: Why Ethereum Is the Next Linux?" argues that Ethereum, like Linux before it, will triumph over closed, proprietary systems in finance due to its open, permissionless, and credibly neutral nature. It draws a historical parallel: just as the open internet defeated corporate private networks and Linux outcompeted proprietary Unix systems, open financial infrastructure like Ethereum will surpass private blockchains. The core advantage lies in the "bazaar" development model (as described in Eric Raymond's "The Cathedral and the Bazaar"), where decentralized, permissionless innovation by a global community of developers outpaces the controlled "cathedral" approach of centralized entities. This model fosters rapid innovation, as seen with Ethereum standards like ERC-20 and applications like Uniswap, which were built without needing permission. Ethereum's key, irreplicable strength is its credible neutrality: transparent, equally applicable, immutable rules that allow anyone to participate. This ensures sovereign independence, meaning no single entity (company, government) can control or change its core rules—a critical feature for global financial infrastructure. In contrast, private blockchains and consortium chains (like SWIFT or various bank-led projects) suffer from platform risk, central control, and an inability to attract broad developer ecosystems, leading to frequent failures. The article notes that major institutions (e.g., BlackRock, JPMorgan, Coinbase, Robinhood) are already building on Ethereum or its Layer 2 networks, recognizing its security, developer ecosystem, and network effects. While critics argue finance requires accountable, controlled systems, the response is that compliance (KYC, regulations) can be built at the application layer on top of a neutral settlement layer like Ethereum, just as secure commerce was built on the open internet via HTTPS. Ultimately, the thesis is that attempting to build walled-garden, proprietary financial networks is a flawed strategy that stifles innovation. The winning approach is to build applications on top of open, credibly neutral infrastructure like Ethereum, which is poised to become the foundational settlement layer for global finance.

Foresight News6m ago

Open Systems Will Ultimately Prevail: Why Ethereum Is the Next Linux?

Foresight News6m ago

The Computing Power Dilemma in the Sino-US AI Rivalry

The Sino-US AI rivalry faces a fundamental bottleneck: the widening compute power gap. While Chinese AI chip companies have seen investment surges, their current focus remains largely on the less demanding inference market. The real challenge lies in the high-end training chip sector, crucial for developing cutting-edge large language models (LLMs), where Nvidia holds a near-monopoly. The compute disparity is stark. US tech giants like Meta, Google, and xAI command massive GPU clusters, enabling them to train trillion-parameter models rapidly. Estimates suggest US data center count and total compute capacity significantly outstrip China's. This "brute force" advantage allows for faster model iteration and exploration of larger parameter scales, with top US models reportedly leading their Chinese counterparts by 8 to 15 months. Chinese alternatives, such as Huawei's Ascend and others from companies like Moore Thread and Biren, are emerging. They show promise in inference and some training scenarios, closing the performance gap with mid-range Nvidia products. However, the core hurdle extends beyond raw chip performance to the entrenched software ecosystem, exemplified by Nvidia's CUDA platform. The path forward involves "walking on two legs": navigating import restrictions while heavily investing in the domestic chip industry. Though still in a catch-up phase, China's vast market, talent pool, and capital are fostering progress. The ultimate test is whether Chinese firms can build a competitive hardware-software ecosystem to power the next generation of AI.

marsbit12m ago

The Computing Power Dilemma in the Sino-US AI Rivalry

marsbit12m ago

He Kaiming's Team's New Work: After Deleting VAE and Private Data, Text-to-Image Generation Becomes Even Stronger

KaiMing He's team introduces **MiniT2I**, a minimalist text-to-image (T2I) model that challenges the complexity of mainstream approaches. It eliminates components commonly considered essential: the VAE encoder-decoder, AdaLN conditioning mechanisms, auxiliary losses, private training data, and post-training alignment stages like RL/DPO. Instead, it uses a pure flow-matching objective trained directly on RGB pixels. The model employs a simplified **MM-JiT** Transformer architecture. It removes AdaLN blocks for conditioning and instead prepends two lightweight text adapter blocks to a standard pre-norm Transformer, allowing frozen T5 text features to adapt to the denoiser. Training follows a two-stage, LLM-like paradigm using only public datasets: pre-training on LLaVA-recaptioned CC12M for coverage, followed by fine-tuning on ~120k high-quality image-text pairs. With just 258M parameters (B/16), MiniT2I achieves competitive scores (0.87 on GenEval, 84.2 on DPG-Bench), outperforming larger pixel-space models. Scaling to 912M parameters (L/16) yields results comparable to SD3-Medium (~2B parameters) in style, composition, and imagination, though it lags in text rendering and named entities due to public data limitations. Key advantages include lower computational cost (~570 GFLOPs vs. ~1379 for latent models) and architectural simplicity. Acknowledged limitations include patch boundary artifacts in pixel space, side effects of high CFG scales, resolution ceilings for sequences longer than 1024 tokens, and the aforementioned data bottlenecks. The work demonstrates that high-performance T2I generation is possible with a radically simplified, publicly reproducible baseline.

marsbit16m ago

He Kaiming's Team's New Work: After Deleting VAE and Private Data, Text-to-Image Generation Becomes Even Stronger

marsbit16m ago

The Insurance Industry Faces Its Biggest Competitor: Are Prediction Markets the "Barbarians at the Gate"?

The insurance industry, long a stable "ballast" in the economy, may face a significant challenge from the rise of prediction markets, which are beginning to function as a new form of risk hedging and insurance. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket are demonstrating their utility in areas traditionally dominated by insurers. Examples include Kalshi's partnership with sports insurance broker Game Point Capital to offer more cost-effective hedging for NBA team performance bonuses, and Polymarket's collaboration with real estate platform Parcl, allowing users to hedge against housing price fluctuations in major US cities. A New York bar also used Kalshi to hedge a marketing promotion tied to an NBA game outcome, highlighting prediction markets' potential for small business risk management. These markets offer advantages over traditional insurance and sports betting in transparency, liquidity, and flexibility. They allow information monetization across a wider range of events, act as neutral platforms rather than direct counterparties, and provide clearer pricing. A historical precedent is the "Mattress Mack" marketing campaigns, which used sports betting for large-scale customer refunds, but prediction markets offer a more systematic and accessible model. Experts like SIG CEO Jeff Yass see their potential for efficient, parameter-based risk sharing, such as for weather-related property damage. However, challenges remain, including liquidity issues, unclear regulatory boundaries, and potential manipulation of event outcomes. Despite these hurdles, prediction markets represent a growing competitive force for both traditional gambling platforms and segments of the insurance industry.

marsbit17m ago

The Insurance Industry Faces Its Biggest Competitor: Are Prediction Markets the "Barbarians at the Gate"?

marsbit17m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片