LUNA to Spike 80%? Here’s What Analysts Think

newsbtcPublished on 2022-03-23Last updated on 2022-03-24

Abstract

Terra's LUNA has been trending to the downside in the past few days, but different indicators show interesting signs and the next price movements could be fundamental to confirm either...

Terra’s LUNA has been trending to the downside in the past few days, but different indicators show interesting signs and the next price movements could be fundamental to confirm either an extremely bullish or a bearish signal.
What Is Boiling Up In LUNA’s Weekly Timeframe?
When an anonymous trader used Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) to analyze LUNA’s next possible movements, the weekly chart showed an interesting crossover.
“Something is up on $LUNA weekly timeframe. Last time the MACD crossover occured it sent $LUNA from $12 to $106.”
A MACD crossover can give a bullish signal when the MACD (see the blue line in the chart below) rises above the signal line (see the yellow line). The opposite crossover would give a bearish signal, which can also be seen below in previous months as an example.

LUNA’s MACD crossovers overtime | LUNAUSD on TradingView.com Another pseudonym trader noted that multiple time frames are looking good for the digital coin, which they think could be because a result of “the massive amount of BTC being bought to help support stable UST or it could be that the whole market is bubbling up”
“1 hour pointing upwards, 4 and 6 hours are about to print bullish twist above the cloud (max bull signal in my mind), 12 hour and daily charts look happy enough and will likely look even nicer as Luna presses to all time highs.”

4,36 Sharpe Ratio
The Sharpe Ratio is a risk/return measure highly used in finance. As per Investopedia, the Ratio describes how much excess return you receive for the extra volatility you endure for holding a riskier asset, determining the investment choice that will deliver the highest returns while considering risk.

  • “Usually, any Sharpe ratio greater than 1.0 is considered acceptable to good by investors.
  • A ratio higher than 2.0 is rated as very good.
  • A ratio of 3.0 or higher is considered excellent.
  • A ratio under 1.0 is considered sub-optimal.”

Similarly, a pseudonym crypto analyst explained during a Youtube Video analyzing LUNA’s share ratio that, in general, “If you are [the Sharpe ratio] at one, it is a superb result and it means you are crushing the market, you’re beating everything out there,” and LUNA Sharpe ratio is 4.36.
“It’s off the charts positive. This thing is just a beast and there’s many people calling for a $200 Luna in in the near term, but also potentially, $200 Avalanche, $200 SOL. Either way these three are kind of winners right now.”
However, there are limitations when using Sharpe Ratio, as it can oversimplify risk and treat all volatility as the same. Some inflated Sharpe Ratios can turn out to be misleading if the whole story of the investments was not addressed correctly.
Possible Double-Top
On the other hand, there is a possibility of a double top that could be triggered if the price breaks out from the support level neckline. This would be extremely bearish for LUNA.

LUNAUSD 4-hour timeframe on TradingView.com There are limitations when spotting a double top, and “Basing a double top solely on the formation of two consecutive peaks could lead to a false reading and cause an early exit from a position,” Investopedia explains.
Because of this reason, this is not a confirmed bearish signal and the following movements will be vital to identify a possible trend. A failed double top could shoot up LUNA’s price proving previous signs right.
In a different analyst’s opinion, he noticed LUNA’s double top but added that it is still showing a bullish mark structure in the 4-hour timeline.
“There’s a lot of high sell volume coming in, and it looks like there is potentially some type of head and shoulders pattern playing out. But I would be careful shorting this one personally just because I think that usually, you don’t want to short stuff that’s super strong in general.”
At the moment, it looks like the coin could go either way: a huge spike or a crash around 50%. Regarding Terra’s ecosystem, it is also important to see how recent developments unfold as they dig into the unknown territory of bitcoin-backed currencies.
At the time of writing, LUNA is down 2.04% in the day to $93,31.

Related Reads

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

Claude Code introduces dynamic workflows, enabling AI to coordinate teams of specialized agents for complex tasks. This transforms Claude from a code assistant into a programmable workbench. Workflows address key limitations of single-agent systems: agentic laziness (premature task completion), self-preferential bias (favoring own outputs), and goal drift (losing sight of original objectives). The system allows Claude to dynamically create execution frameworks using JavaScript. It can split tasks, dispatch parallel agents for isolated work (e.g., in separate worktrees), implement adversarial validation, run tournaments, and synthesize results. This multi-agent approach is valuable for tasks requiring deep research, factual verification, code migration, root cause analysis, large-scale triage, and qualitative sorting. Key patterns include: classify-and-route, fan-out-and-synthesize, adversarial verification, generate-and-filter, tournaments, and loop-until-done. While token usage is higher, workflows excel where tasks resemble programming—needing problem decomposition, isolated context, hypothesis testing, and handling many details. They extend Claude Code's utility beyond technical work to areas like business plan review, resume screening, and naming brainstorm. The feature is not a universal solution but points to a future where AI tool competitiveness depends on organizing reliable, reusable, and auditable execution flows for complex goals.

marsbit15m ago

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

marsbit15m ago

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

Hyperliquid: The 24/7 Trading "Convenience Store" for Wall Street Hyperliquid, a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange, has become a go-to platform for Wall Street traders seeking to trade around the clock, especially during traditional market closures. Founded by Jeff Yan, a former quantitative trader, after the FTX collapse, the platform emphasizes user self-custody of assets. It offers a wide range of perpetual contracts—leveraged derivatives with no expiry—on assets from Bitcoin and crude oil to the S&P 500 and even pre-IPO companies like SpaceX. A notable example involves a hedge fund trader who capitalized on geopolitical news over a weekend, securing a 243% return on oil derivatives before markets reopened. The platform, run by just 11 employees, generated approximately $800 million in revenue last year, and its native token HYPE has seen significant growth. Its rise highlights the merging of traditional finance and crypto. While U.S. users are currently restricted, recent CFTC rule changes could open access. The platform is known for its transparency, having processed $10 billion in liquidations during a market crash while competitors faltered. Regulators warn of the high risks and complexity of perpetual contracts for retail investors. Key to its appeal is a strong community culture, direct engagement with founders, and a simple interface. Despite rules against VPN use, it attracts global users with its permissionless approach. Hyperliquid plans to expand into prediction markets and options, aiming to eventually host all financial activity.

marsbit15m ago

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

marsbit15m ago

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbit42m ago

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片