3 historically accurate Bitcoin on-chain metrics are flashing 'bottom'

CointelegraphPublished on 2022-10-22Last updated on 2022-10-22

Abstract

Key Bitcoin indicators tracking its market versus fair value, as well as long-term holders' confidence, hint at a market bottom formation.

Bitcoin and other riskier assets slipped on Friday as traders scrutinized macro indicators that suggest the Federal Reserve would continue to hike rates. Nonetheless, the BTC/USD pair remains rangebound inside the $18,000-$20,000 price range, showing a strong bias conflict in the market.
""

BTC price holding above $18K since June
""

Notably, BTC's price has been unable to diver deeper below $18,000 since it first tested the support level in June 2022. As a result, some analysts believe that the cryptocurrency is bottoming out, given it has already corrected by over 70% from its record high of $69,000, established almost a year ago.

BTC/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

""

During the 2018 bear market, BTC saw a max drawdown from peak to trough of 84%, lasting 364 days, while the 2014 cycle lasted longer, bottoming after 407 days," noted Arcane Research in its weekly crypto market report, adding:
""

"Both bottoms were followed by unusually low volatility."

Bitcoin's historical drawdowns. Source: Arcane Research

""

In addition, a flurry of widely-watched on-chain Bitcoin indicators also hints at a potential bullish reversal ahead. Let's look at some of the most historically significant metrics. 
""

Bitcoin MVRV-Z Score
""

The MVRV-Z Score assesses Bitcoin's overbought and oversold statuses based on its market and fair value.
""

Historically, when Bitcoin's market value crosses the fair value, it indicates a market top (the red zone). Conversely, it indicates a market bottom (the green zone) when the market value crosses below the fair value.

Bitcoin MVRV Z-Score. Source: Glassnode

""

The MVRV-Z Score has been in the green zone since late June, suggesting Bitcoin is bottoming out.
""

Reserve Risk
""

Bitcoin's Reserve Risk assesses the confidence of the token's long-term holders relative to its price at the point in time. Historically, a higher Reserve Risk (the red zone) has coincided with market tops, reflecting lower investment confidence at record-high Bitcoin prices.
""

Conversely, higher confidence and lower Bitcoin price mean lower Reserve Risk (the green zone), or better risk/reward for investing.

Bitcoin Reserve Risk vs. price. Source: Glassnode

""

Bitcoin's Reserve Risk plunged into the green zone in late June, suggesting that BTC may undergo a strong bullish reversal sooner or later.
""

Bitcoin Puell Multiple
""

The Puell Multiple reflects the ratio of the daily Bitcoin issuance (in U.S. dollars) and the 365-day moving average of daily issuance value.

""

Historical data shows Bitcoin market bottoming out when the Puell Multiple drops into the green zone defined by the 0.3-0.5 range. Conversely, the market peaks out when the ratio crosses into the 4-8 red zone.

Bitcoin Puell Multiple vs. price. Source: Glassnode

""

As of October, Bitcoin's Puell Multiple is inside the green zone, suggesting a potential price reversal ahead to the upside.
""

As Cointelegraph reported, the BTC balance on cryptocurrency exchanges has also fallen to multi-year lows at the fastest pace since June, suggesting that current price levels are becoming an important area of accumulation. 

Related Reads

Observation of Data on the Top Six Cryptocurrency Protocols: Revenue Continues to Grow, So Why Aren't Token Prices Rising?

Despite generating impressive revenue, many top cryptocurrency protocols struggle to translate this success into token price appreciation. This analysis of six major protocols (Aave, Aerodrome, Hyperliquid, Pump, Sky, Uniswap) examines the disconnect, focusing on revenue generation, distribution, and tokenomics. While these protocols collectively earned over $726 million in the first half of 2026, token performance largely lagged due to factors like imbalanced token emissions, unclear value capture mechanisms, and equity-token separations that disadvantage holders. Key findings reveal that not all revenue is equal for token holders. Protocols differ significantly in how they allocate income. Hyperliquid, for instance, directs 100% of its revenue to holders via buybacks and burns, correlating with strong token performance. Others, like Aerodrome, Sky, and Uniswap, showed negative net token flows when accounting for high token emissions used for incentives, offsetting holder benefits. The article highlights two primary value capture methods: buybacks/burns and direct fee distribution (e.g., ve-tokenomics models). The analysis concludes that high revenue alone doesn't guarantee token growth. Investors must scrutinize a protocol's sustainable revenue sources, how that value is shared with token holders, and the associated token release schedules and supply pressures. The future points towards greater alignment between protocol success and tokenholder rewards, but only for projects that seriously address all three pillars: revenue, distribution, and emissions.

marsbit39m ago

Observation of Data on the Top Six Cryptocurrency Protocols: Revenue Continues to Grow, So Why Aren't Token Prices Rising?

marsbit39m ago

September 1st, A Major Chip Price Hike

On July 29, 2026 (US time), Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 (Q2 CY) results. Revenue reached $9.95 billion, up 4% and beating estimates, but net profit fell 25% YoY to $2 billion. The "revenue up, profit down" trend is attributed to rising costs across semiconductor manufacturing, testing, packaging, and materials. In response, CEO Cristiano Amon announced price increases for all chip products, effective September 1, to pass on costs and restore historical profit margins. The stock fell over 5% in after-hours trading due to weaker-than-expected Q4 profit guidance. Qualcomm's core chip business (QCT) revenue was $8.5 billion, down 5% YoY. Handset revenue dropped 20% to $5.09 billion, reflecting a weak global smartphone market with declining shipments. In contrast, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59 billion, marking 23 consecutive quarters of double-digit growth, and IoT revenue grew 9% to $1.83 billion. The licensing division (QTL) revenue was $1.28 billion, down 3%. Facing smartphone headwinds and a reduced component share in future iPhones, Qualcomm is aggressively diversifying. It is betting heavily on the data center AI market, maintaining a target of $5 billion in data center revenue for FY2027. The company completed the acquisition of AI software firm Modular to build an open software platform for generative AI. For Q4 FY2026, Qualcomm forecasts revenue between $9.7B and $10.5B, roughly in line with expectations. However, non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of the $2.36 analyst consensus. Management expects the chip price increases to gradually improve margins after September 1, but near-term profitability pressure from costs and the weak handset market persists.

marsbit39m ago

September 1st, A Major Chip Price Hike

marsbit39m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片