加息见顶,短期反弹可期

币市操盘手Published on 2022-09-23Last updated on 2022-09-23

Abstract

在美联储继续释放大幅加息信号的影响下,十年期美债收益率在九月份大幅飙升,并刷新11年内的最高纪录。

Btc

NEWS

在美联储继续释放大幅加息信号的影响下,十年期美债收益率在九月份大幅飙升,并刷新11年内的最高纪录。作为全球资产定价之锚,十年期美债收益率持续走高,不仅使得大宗商品、股票、加密货币等风险资产一片惨跌,就连非美元货币市场也在巨大利差冲击下接连崩溃。而在美国通胀持续高烧不退的背景下,美联储年内继续大幅加息已成定局,那么市场是否还有交易机会?

昨天凌晨,美联储如期完成了75个基点的加息目标,美股和加密市场应声大跌。在美联储加息后,美国短期国债收益率快速飙升,长短期国债收益率倒挂进一步加深,其中5年期和30年国债国债的利差到达20年来的最高水平,但美元指数却依然坚挺地站稳110大关,市场似乎对美联储为控制通胀,不惜让经济陷入衰退的决心深信不疑。然而,在美联储利率决议后,鲍威尔在表决心的发言中,又戏剧性地出现自毁决心的一幕“通胀似乎得到很好的控制,在某些时候放缓加息步伐可能是合适的”。连续两次犯下“低级错误”,鲍威尔鹰皮鸽心的本质一览无遗。

如果说鲍威尔在杰克逊霍尔全球央行年会上的鹰派发言是削减加息预期落空的标志,而市场对美国8月份CPI的失望是紧缩预期强化的开始,那么,近期市场上“年内还将加息150个基点”,“本轮加息利率的终点为4.7.5-5%”等甚嚣尘上的激进言论很可能就是加息见顶的信号。因为在通胀势头最凶猛的6、7月份美联储都将加息的幅度设定在75个基点,而在通胀见顶的后期,美联储强实际已经无需采取更加激进的加息措施,所以,继续保持强鹰姿态的目的实际是为了引导预期,夯实抗通胀成果。

一直以来,无风险利率上升对高风险、低流动性的资产冲击都非常明显。但这一轮由削减加息预期落空引发的调整,除了利好兑现的ETH出现大跌外,大部分币种的下跌都非常温和,甚至一部分中大市值的品种还逆势上涨,例如XRP,ALGO等。这个现象说明了利率上升利空逻辑连续作用多次,币价的反应也会逐渐麻木。而从交易的角度考量,当乐观预期被快速证伪之后,失望情绪的突然暴发往往会导致利空在悲观预期中被过度放大,这也意味着在利空靴子落地后,市场可能会有短暂的技术性反弹。

尽管在未来较长的一段时间里,市场调整的格局仍会延续,但得益于长期持有者的不断增加和超级巨鲸自救意愿的增强,市场的调整将逐渐趋于平缓。首先,链上分析公司Glassnode数据显示,在钱包中休眠一年或一年以上时间的比特币供应比例已经达到65.78%,刷新历史新高,而2022年是近三年来长期持有者占比上升最快的一年,这说长期持有者的决心正不断增强。其次,为了购买更多的比特币,MicroStrategy于9月10日公布5亿美元的股票发行计划,并在近期耗资600万美元完成301枚比特币的购买。同时,9月21日,沉默了近三个月的第三大比特币巨鲸又增持了1167枚比特币,单日增持增持规模达到近几个月来的最高水平,巨鲸们似乎开始酝酿新一轮的反攻。

正当大部分币种正在遭遇阴跌的折磨时,XRP却在八个交易日里上涨了56%,成为近期表现最亮眼的黑马之一。虽然XRP的上涨得益于Ripple Labs与证监会的诉讼获得重大进展,但是资金深度介入的背后很可能是市场情绪回暖的信号。如果XRP能够继续向上打开空间,那么赚钱效应将继续向其他中大市值的品种扩散。当然,必须强调的是,在存量格局下,龙头溢出效应的传导往往都非常急促,一旦出现中阳线以上的反弹,投资者就要开始考虑交出筹码。

昨晚,加密市场摆脱美股下跌的影响独立走强,资金逆势抄底的迹象明显,超跌反弹的有利条件逐渐出现。从的技术走势来看,大饼的18000防线已经连续经受了多次考验,这表明18000一带的支撑短期依然有效。预计在短暂的震荡整固后,大饼仍有继续上摸21000的机会。此外,在合并POS利好落地后,ETH开始消化前期巨大的浮盈盘,此轮调整最低曾一度下探至1219,区间最大跌幅高达40%,距离有吸引的目标价格1200已经很近,所以,做超跌反弹的首先依然还是ETH。

防失联可以添加小编微信号:

微信扫一扫

关注该公众号

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit3h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit3h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手5h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片