Bitcoin drill drops sharply, and bad news of interest rate increase is still on the way

HuobiPublished on 2022-09-14Last updated on 2022-09-19

Abstract

Inflation remains high, the expectation of the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates is enhanced, and bad news is on the way.

1. The Federal Reserve's forecast of interest rate increase is one-sided

On September 13, the US August CPI data showed that the overall CPI rose 0.1% month on month (QoQ), 0.1 percentage points higher than that in July; CPI rose 8.3% year on year (without quarterly adjustment), lower than the 8.5% year-on-year increase in July, but still higher than the market expectation.

As a result, investors' anticipation of the Federal Reserve's interest rate hike has heated up. According to the "Fed Watch" tool of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group (CME), 64% of investors are betting that they will raise interest rates by 75 basis points in July. The proportion of investors betting that the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates by 100 basis points in July was 36%. Judging from the size of investors' bets, there is no doubt that the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates by more than 75% basis points. Compared with the 75 basis points increase on June 16 and July 27, the fact that the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates by 75 basis points for the third time will come next.

To reduce inflation to the benchmark target interest rate of 2%, the Federal Reserve has raised interest rates for four consecutive times this year, and the federal funds rate is currently 2.25% - 2.50%.

2. The US dollar soared and BTC fell to a low level

Affected by the expected rise in interest rates, the overall market shock space has significantly increased.

On September 13, the three major indexes of US stocks opened at a low price and moved at a low price, the biggest drop since June 11, 2020. By the end of the day, the Dow had dropped 3.94%; The S&P 500 index fell 4.32%; The Nasdaq fell 5.16%.

Excluding the initial stage of the epidemic, the Nasdaq and the S&P 500 index fell the most on Tuesday since 2011.

Of course, the most important fluctuation occurred in the change of the US dollar index. The US dollar index, which measures the US dollar against six major currencies, soared 1.52%, reaching a high of 109.97 at the highest level. At the same time, although BTC is not one of the six currencies measured by the dollar index, its withdrawal from the outside still makes investors see the shock effect of financial market linkage.

From the 30 minute K line chart of BTC, the fact that the BTC price collapsed instantaneously shows that bad news is imminent, and short-term bearish continues to release investors' worries about interest rate hikes.

BTC linked with the strong shock of the dollar index in the 30 minute K line chart, and the price fell by 5.79% in half an hour, and there was a rare large-scale performance recently. Next, it hit the lowest intraday low of $19860, with a cumulative decline of more than 11%.

3. Price performance of previous interest rate increases

In fact, the adjustment of BTC has not ended since 2022. During the two interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve in June and June, BTC showed different trend characteristics. The price fell 9.66% on June 16 and rose 7.99% on July 27. Before the interest rate increase on September 22, BTC prices showed a significant large-scale retreat at the daily K-line level, sweeping away the strong price performance of nearly a week. Considering that the fluctuation range of BTC is relatively limited in the past three months, the short-term price retreat may bring the inevitable fact of price decline.

4. Does the market release selling pressure in advance

To judge whether BTC will release the selling pressure in a short period of time, we need to pay attention to the size of BTC's hold. In recent years, although BTC has continued to rebound technically, the size of the holding plate has declined rapidly, and the overall proportion is still high. The figures on September 13 showed that there were as many as 43.6% of unrealized losses. Under the negative expectation, it is very difficult for BTC to reduce the size of its hold ups in a short period of time. What's more, the current size of BTC's hold ups is the highest in the past three years.

5. Main selling of BTC spot

In terms of spot goods, the number of whales sold by BTC has obviously increased. On September 13, the proportion of the number of giant whales sold rose to 0.718, reaching a high level within a year. Specifically, the ratio of the top ten inflows to the total inflows rebounded to 71.8%, which was only lower than 0.723 on April 10, 0.749 on June 4 and 0.742 on July 17.

The selling volume of the giant whale increased significantly, and the selling pressure in the key rebound stage increased, and the market was on the verge of continuous price decline.

6. ETH market performance

The ETH price continued to retreat in the short term, falling for three consecutive trading days, and the trading volume also rebounded. In terms of decline, the decline reached 12% in three trading days. From the perspective of rebound space, the current ETH price has not reached the previous high of more than $2000, indicating that the recent rebound is not strong enough, and there is an opportunity for the market to change in the weak market. In the shrinking trend, after ETH has dropped in volume for three consecutive trading days, it means that the possibility of price adjustment is still large.

7. A large number of ETH flows into the exchange

The number of ETHs flowing into the exchange increased significantly, from 21.86 million on September 9 to 22.65 million on September 14, an increase of 790000 ETHs, worth more than 1.3 billion dollars. Judging from the speed of ETH flowing into the exchange, it may be the fastest inflow performance in the year. Therefore, for the growth of selling pressure, investors in short-term trading can pay attention to the pace of price adjustment.

Related Reads

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's Latest Warning: Betting Entirely on a Single AI Model Hands Over a Company's Lifeblood

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella warns that companies relying solely on a single AI model could jeopardize their survival. He argues that over-dependence leads to "vendor lock-in," where businesses risk ceding control over their core data, memory, contextual history, and AI usage patterns. This dependence essentially outsources a company's critical thinking and operational know-how to an external provider. The deeper a company integrates with one AI system—feeding it prompts, internal data, and workflows—the more it reveals its unique business methods and competitive edge. This accumulated knowledge could become accessible to the AI supplier. Furthermore, switching providers becomes extremely costly and complex, as companies would need to rebuild their entire AI-augmented workflow, memory, and tool integrations from scratch. Nadella's solution is "decoupling." Companies should separate their proprietary data, memory, and control layer (or "harness") from the underlying AI models. By retaining metadata from every AI interaction, businesses can preserve their operational "brain" or institutional knowledge. This allows them to flexibly use different AI models (e.g., from OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft) for specific tasks without losing their accumulated expertise. The core idea: companies can rent the smartest models available, but they must keep their own "brain" and operational control firmly in-house.

marsbit26m ago

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's Latest Warning: Betting Entirely on a Single AI Model Hands Over a Company's Lifeblood

marsbit26m ago

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

A founder at an energy investment forum advises bitcoin miners not to purchase GPUs for AI themselves, but to instead focus on infrastructure like power and data center space. Mike Alfred of Alpine Fox stated that while AI infrastructure demand is a long-term, 20-30 year trend, it presents a key choice for miners. The first, riskier model involves owning and operating GPUs, which requires financing expensive hardware that quickly becomes obsolete. The second, more conservative model is akin to real estate: providing colocation services where clients bring their own servers, and the miner sells space, power, cooling, and water. Alfred noted this model is easier to finance. Most existing bitcoin mining sites are difficult and expensive to convert for AI, as AI data centers require far higher construction costs, redundant fiber connections, backup power, complex cooling, and near 100% uptime. A hybrid model, where mining acts as a flexible load to use excess power during AI data center construction or from generation facilities, was discussed. However, participants concluded this is only viable with very cheap power; otherwise, developers are better off focusing solely on AI. Miners are increasingly being evaluated for their available power capacity and project portfolios rather than just bitcoin output. Panelists also warned of risks in the AI sector, predicting at least one major default or contract breach among AI tenants, lenders, or landlords before bitcoin's next halving in 2028.

cryptonews.ru35m ago

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

cryptonews.ru35m ago

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

"Millisecond 'Paid Queue-Jumping': How Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Became a Multi-Million Dollar Annual Business" In traditional finance, high-frequency trading firms spend millions on infrastructure for millisecond advantages. Hyperliquid has translated this race onto the blockchain with its "Priority Fee" system, creating an open economic game for speed. This system auctions two types of priority: **Gossip Priority** for faster data feeds (via a Dutch auction every 3 minutes), and **Order Priority** for front-of-queue trade execution (users bid a fee for lower latency). This converts a hardware race into a transparent, market-priced mechanism. Since launch, this feature has generated over $5M in protocol revenue. Projected annualized buybacks from this income exceed $30M, accounting for ~7% of total protocol revenue. The demand stems from large traders and market makers on Hyperliquid, for whom milliseconds can mean the difference between profit/loss or avoiding liquidation. Market makers pay these fees as "protection" to ensure their orders execute first, which in turn improves liquidity for all users. Crucially, Hyperliquid internalizes Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) that typically leaks to external validators or searchers, creating a new revenue stream beyond trading fees. The mechanism also strengthens HYPE's tokenomics. While 97% of trading fees fund secondary market buybacks (via the Assistance Fund), Priority Fees are **directly burned**, adding a second deflationary engine. Furthermore, fees for order priority are deducted from users' undelegated HYPE balances, encouraging large traders to hold and lock up tokens, reducing circulating supply. However, a key challenge remains: balancing the speed needs of institutional players with fair market access for retail users, as those who cannot pay high fees may suffer worse slippage during volatility. In summary, Hyperliquid's Priority Fee is a novel model that monetizes latency, captures MEV for the protocol, and enhances its native token's value through burning and lock-ups.

marsbit40m ago

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片