Ethereum’s cat herder: Hudson Jameson reflects on the journey to The Merge

THE BLOCKPublished on 2022-09-11Last updated on 2022-09-11

Abstract

By running the core developer meetings, Jameson ended up playing a key role in keeping Ethereum development on track.

Hudson Jameson can code, but he’d prefer to leave that to others who are more skilled. He’d rather do the talking.

After growing up in Northeast Texas, he studied computer science at the University of North Texas. “There I found out I'm not good at software development,” said Jameson. “But I can understand it.”

His understanding of software and his ability to explain it left him uniquely equipped to be the coordinator of all the Ethereum core developers, a role he held for four years at the Ethereum Foundation.

“I could speak the language to the developers exactly as they needed to hear it, while also coordinating people who didn’t want to make decisions and didn’t want to do the coordination; they just wanted to code,” Jameson said. “It was a really good match.”

Jameson stepped down from his role in April 2021 to take a mental health break. He’s now independent except for a few advisory roles.

But even though he doesn’t officially work for Ethereum anymore, he’s in a unique position to reflect on Ethereum’s long journey to The Merge, the major upgrade to proof-of-stake consensus that began its initial stage this week.

‘Just get up and do it’

Jameson cannot hide his excitement for The Merge. “This is the biggest thing to happen to Ethereum since it launched. It literally cannot be overstated how insane this is that we are finally here after so many years of research and development on it,” he said.

He said he was recently looking at the blog post from the Ethereum Foundation showing the approximate dates for The Merge. “I kind of felt how I felt in 2015 when I was getting super involved in Ethereum and every day was a circus. I was just like, ‘Oh, this is so exciting, this is something I've been waiting for for years and it's finally coming to fruition.’”

Jameson was working as a software developer at financial services firm USAA when Ethereum launched in 2015. He was already well into the crypto rabbit hole by then, having discovered Bitcoin four years earlier.

“I was obsessed with Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies at the beginning because I felt that there needed to be censorship-resistant and privacy enabling technology to help people who are like in countries where you can't get information or money in and out,” he said.

When Ethereum launched, it was clear to Jameson that it provided more capabilities than Bitcoin. “You can have a program that's running that no one can stop — no one can put a stop to it — or you can write anything on the chain you want in the nano field, and no one can censor it. That’s super powerful.”

Jameson was inspired. He volunteered to moderate Ethereum chat rooms, including on Reddit. He then headed to the first Devcon, Ethereum's developer conference, in London and started volunteering at events. Ming Chan, then the executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, took note and asked if he wanted a job at the foundation.

Around eight months later, Jameson quit his role at the USAA and joined the foundation. Except he had no specific role — that wasn’t how the foundation worked. “Now there are more formalized roles, but it was kind of much more: if you want something accomplished, you just get up and do it.”

Herding cats

Jameson spent his first year or so at the foundation helping to run DevCon 2 and DevCon 3. But at this time, “it was made kind of apparent that there were a few major gaps in certain areas of Ethereum and protocol development.” For instance, there wasn’t a consistent process for proposing and debating upgrades to the system.

So Jameson started managing the Ethereum Improvement Protocol (EIP) repository, the space where all Ethereum upgrades begin. He helped redo EIP 1, which sets out the rules governing the EIP process, to make it more clear and streamlined. He described himself as the de-facto EIP editor-in-chief.

He also noted that core developer meetings were not happening regularly, mostly because they didn’t have any formal structure or cadence. “So the communication was starting to get kind of wonky. No one was really talking as much as they should. There wasn't a lot of cross-team communication,” he said.

Jameson restarted the calls and began recording and live streaming them to make them more transparent. Later on, he helped set up a group called the Ethereum Cat Herders, which would take notes during developer meetings and help to educate the community on what was happening.

By running the core developer meetings, Jameson ended up playing a key role in keeping Ethereum development on track. He acted as a metronome, helping the groups of developers keep to the same beat.

“My role on the calls was basically to set the agenda, make sure the correct people were on the call. And so kind of be more of a gatekeeper for who can come on and off the calls,” he said. “But it was a very loose gatekeeping job because, generally, I want to keep out trolls more than anything because the people who needed to be on there would just navigate to the calls kind of organically.”

His software engineering background enabled him to understand the complex discussions, which he had a knack for breaking down into simpler terms. Since he was “hyper obsessed with Ethereum” he was always ready with talking points. And the fact that most of the communication occurred online suited Jameson just fine.

“I think some of that can be attributed to the fact that I'm neurodivergent,” Jameson said. “So because of that, I don't always understand some of the social cues of in-person interactions, but online you just have to do the words correctly. And so that's a lot easier to do.”

Even on voice calls, you don’t have to make eye contact, you can have your camera off and you might not even use your real name, he added. “So that's really empowering.”

Looking back at Ethereum’s journey

Throughout his time running the core developers meeting, Jameson had a unique view of everything that happened and how it progressed.

Proof-of-stake has long been the goal, dating all the way back to when the network launched, he said. For a long time, the developers were able to view that as a long-term goal and focus on putting out smaller fires, he said. But eventually, Ethereum started growing so fast that they could no longer ignore the environmental impact of the network’s proof-of-work consensus model.

“This wasn't supposed to happen this quickly. At least that's my perspective,” Jameson said. The rapid growth isn’t a bad thing, he added. “But it does have consequences.”

This fast growth of the network and the growth in the number of groups of developers working on it was one of the biggest changes during the years he worked full-time for Ethereum, said Jameson. In the network’s early years there weren’t any applications that were widely used and that there were only a few Ethereum clients. Now, there are many popular applications and around a dozen clients — run by a much larger ecosystem of developer teams.

At the same time, according to Jameson, the growth in the number of stakeholders has slowed the speed of innovation. “We're moving at a glacial pace compared to what we were in 2015, and that's not bad. That just means we have more voices, more coordination to do, more ideas, more things to argue over or discuss,” he said.

The network’s methodical march toward its transition to proof of stake is an example of this, he said. For years, the Ethereum community grappled with multiple different implementations before eventually settling on the current plan, which Jameson is convinced is better for Ethereum than the original ideas.

Jameson admits his hyperfixation on Ethereum took a toll on his mental health and eventually led him to step away. Still, the arrival of The Merge makes it feel like his energy didn’t go to waste. “We're finally getting there and we're also doing something that's going to be very impactful towards the environment and towards a better security for the chain.”

Such a technical achievement is only possible through the kind of human coordination and communication that has been Jameson’s speciality. “Ethereum is about people, I think, more than money and more than technology,” he said.

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1m ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1m ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片