直面1亿美元罚款,MicroStrategy会抛13万枚BTC吗?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2022-09-02Last updated on 2022-09-05

Abstract

若此次诉讼终获成功,MicroStrategy 或将受到冲击。而现金储备匮乏的 MicroStrategy,又将如何应对法币不足的危机,如何处理自己的巨额比特币持仓?

若此次诉讼终获成功,MicroStrategy 或将受到冲击。而现金储备匮乏的 MicroStrategy,又将如何应对法币不足的危机,如何处理自己的巨额比特币持仓?未来是否存在巨额比特币抛售、冲击市场的风险?

北京时间 9 月 1 日凌晨,华盛顿特区首席检察官 Karl Racine 正在起诉 MicroStrategy 公司及其联合 创始人 、前 CEO Michael Saylor 涉嫌逃税。受此消息影响,MicroStrategy 股价今日持续受挫。

对于加密世界来说,MicroStrategy 是一个独特的存在——永远的多头。根据 Bitcoin Treasuries 统计,目前 MicroStrategy 持有超 12.9 万枚比特币,在机构持仓数量中仅次于 Grayscale、block one、MTGOX。该公司前 CEO Michael Saylor ,即诉讼案的起诉对象,正是其买入比特币行为的主要推动者,在牛市是也被视为推动价格上涨的有力旗手。

若此次诉讼终获成功,MicroStrategy 或将受到冲击。而现金储备匮乏的 MicroStrategy,又将如何应对法币不足的危机,如何处理自己的巨额比特币持仓?未来是否存在巨额比特币抛售、冲击市场的风险?

高管逃税风波

昨日,首席检察官Karl Racine公开表示。 “Saylor(MicroStrategy CEO)已经在华盛顿生活了十多年,但从未缴纳过任何所得税。我们想提醒大家注意:如果你在享受到生活在我们这座伟大城市的所有好处的同时拒绝缴纳税款,我们将追究你的责任。”

而且他还不忘补充Saylor和加密世界的关系,“这位首席执行官在过去几年里成为比特币和区块链技术最公开的支持者之一,他发起了一场活动来宣传公司持有比特币的好处。”

根据检察官的指控,MicroStrategy 密谋帮助 Saylor 逃避大约2500万美元的税款。MicroStrategy 公司实际知晓 Saylor 的相关情况,但并未准确向税务当局报告,而是选择与Saylor合作,为他逃税提供便利。

检察官称 Saylor 自2014年起,就未曾履行足够的纳税义务。通过本次诉讼,检察官试图从 Saylor 和 MicroStrategy 那里收回未缴税款和罚款,总额将超过 1 亿美元。

失血的MicroStrateg

尽管起诉才拉开序幕,最终结果还要经历漫长的过程。但对 MicroStrategy 面临危机已成事实,毕竟 MicroStrategy 的现金流已经濒临枯竭了。

对于一家斥资近 40 亿美元投资的公司来说,1 亿美元似乎不算多,但税务部门是不支持加密支付的。MicroStrategy 今年 Q2 财报显示,截至 2022 年 6 月 30 日,公司的现金和现金等价物仅余为 6940 万美元。且公司经营仍在持续亏损。

本季度,MicroStrategy 的运营亏损为 9.181 亿美元,而较 2021 年同比扩大 121%。净亏损也持续扩大至 10.62 亿美元,而在 2021 年 Q2 仅为 2.993 亿美元。

数据显示,MicroStrategy 购买这些比特币总花费约 39.65 亿美元购买比特币,平均成本价为 30,700 美元,而目前却产生了巨大亏损。这也是 MicroStrategy 财报中亏损的主要来源。

钻石手还能HODL吗?

在投资者的印象中,MicroStrategy 是比特币强力的钻石手、吹鼓手、HODLer。在牛市中,这一策略尚可维持,如今持续失血的 MicroStrategy 还能 HODL 多久?

今年 6 月,MicroStrategy 曾首次转移比特币,将 2089.99 枚转移到一个新钱包。这也一度引发市场猜测,钻石手终于要卖出自己的比特币。但后续并无进一步进展公布。

对于 MicroStrategy,除了日常经营的现金流,其贷款利息也需持续支付法币。在购买庞大的比特币储备中,仅不足一半的资金来自 MicroStrategy 自身资金储备,其余大部分均来自贷款购买。

今年 3 月时,MicroStrategy 从加密银行 Silvergate 得到利率约为 4% 的 2.05 亿美元贷款,其中大部分以比特币为抵押。

借贷之时,MicroStrategy 将 LTV 维持在 200%,根据当时价格计算,价格低于 21000 美元时 MicroStrategy 将被要求追加保证金。而目前比特币早已多次跌破这一数值。若比特币继续下跌,MicroStrategy 可能还将面临更多的追加追加保证金要求。

MicroStrategy 还发行了可转换债券总计 17.5 亿美元,利率约为 0.75%。此外,还有高级担保贷款 5 亿美元,利率为 6.1%。

通过上述债务估算,MicroStrategy 从 2022 年起每年须支付利息约 3500 万美元。

过去两年,MicroStrategy 每季度的净利在剔除投资减值损失后基本维持在 1000 万美元左右。也就是说,MicroStrategy 软件业务的盈利,每年刚好大致可覆盖贷款利息。

总而言之,目前 MicroStrategy 的经营处于一个微弱的平衡之中,若 MicroStrategy 被处以巨额罚款,MicroStrategy 仅有 6940 万现金储备可供动用。届时恐怕只有卖币才交得起罚款了。

目前,税务机构对 MicroStrategy 的诉讼仍刚刚拉开序幕,MicroStrategy 这个著名的钻石手,这次还能 HODL 住吗?

Related Reads

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System Using First Principles

Former SpaceX engineer Lex Li applies "First Principles Thinking" to financial infrastructure with Plan Execution Lab, recently raising angel funding at a $50M post-money valuation. The team argues that the core function of finance is capital allocation, and the critical gap is not in trading but in execution, which remains highly manual and fragmented. While assets, liquidity, and settlement have migrated on-chain, execution workflows (monitoring, risk management, liquidity coordination) are still human-native. In an era of accelerating AI agents, strategy decay is rapid, shifting the competitive edge from having the best strategy to having the most robust execution network. Plan Execution Lab introduces two core components: 1. **PlanX**: A Financial Execution Protocol designed as infrastructure for the migration from CEX to DEX, providing on-chain execution capabilities, liquidity access, risk management, and capital orchestration. 2. **Xgent**: An Autonomous Financial Runtime. Users define investment intents, risk preferences, and constraints; Xgent automatically constructs an execution graph, verifies it, and handles ongoing execution and optimization—streamlining the process from Intent to Autonomous Execution. The long-term vision is to create the "Bloomberg Terminal for Autonomous Finance"—a shared operating environment and execution network built collectively by participants like execution nodes, liquidity providers, and autonomous agents. The future of finance, they contend, belongs not to isolated algorithms but to open, collaborative execution networks.

marsbit20m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System Using First Principles

marsbit20m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System from First Principles

Plan Execution Lab, a financial infrastructure project founded by former SpaceX engineer Lex Li, has raised angel funding at a $50M post-money valuation. The startup is applying "first principles thinking" from Li's SpaceX experience to rethink financial market execution. Their analysis posits that while assets, liquidity, and settlement have moved on-chain, the execution layer remains fundamentally human-dependent and fragmented. In the era of AI Agents, strategy advantages decay rapidly, shifting the competitive edge from isolated algorithms to robust **execution networks**. Plan Execution Lab's solution is a two-part system: **PlanX**, a Financial Execution Protocol designed to facilitate the migration from centralized exchanges (CEX) to on-chain markets by providing core on-chain execution capabilities; and **Xgent**, an Autonomous Financial Runtime. Xgent allows users to define investment goals and constraints, then autonomously constructs and manages the execution logic—moving from **Intent to Execution Graph to Verification to Autonomous Execution**. The long-term vision is to create the "Bloomberg Terminal for Autonomous Finance"—an operating environment not for humans, but for agents and execution nodes. The future financial system, they argue, will be a collaborative network built by diverse participants contributing execution capabilities, not secret strategies. The core competition will shift to who builds the most powerful and adaptive execution network.

链捕手21m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System from First Principles

链捕手21m ago

First Long-Horizon Doc2Repo Training Dataset: Code Agents Move Beyond Bug Fixing and Begin Creating Repositories

With the advancement of LLM Code Agents, the research focus is shifting towards long-horizon, real-world tasks, moving beyond simple bug fixes to full repository generation. To address this, researchers from Renmin University of China introduced the DeNovoSWE dataset. This dataset focuses on long-term software engineering tasks, specifically the "document-to-repository" challenge—generating an entire, executable code repository from a task description. The DeNovoSWE construction method employs a Divide & Conquer approach. It breaks down target repositories into core capabilities and uses a multi-agent Draft-Critic-Repair workflow to automatically generate high-quality, evaluation-aligned task documents. The dataset also implements difficulty-aware filtering to balance quality and diversity. The result is a high-quality, anti-leakage dataset of 4,818 instances. Experiments show that models trained on DeNovoSWE achieve significant improvements in long-horizon repository generation. For instance, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct's performance on the BeyondSWE-Doc2Repo benchmark increased from 5.8% to 47.2%, and on NL2RepoBench from 4.3% to 23.0%. Similar gains were observed with stronger backbones, demonstrating that dedicated long-horizon training data is crucial for advancing Code Agents from maintainers to architects capable of planning and building complete software projects from scratch.

marsbit36m ago

First Long-Horizon Doc2Repo Training Dataset: Code Agents Move Beyond Bug Fixing and Begin Creating Repositories

marsbit36m ago

Even CZ Praised Hyperliquid as 'Awesome', But Its Biggest Moat Might Also Be Its Biggest Risk

In an episode of Galaxy Brains, Binance founder CZ praised Hyperliquid as "awesome" but clarified that while its product is strong, Binance cannot compete in its specific niche due to Hyperliquid's no-KYC, decentralized model. CZ noted he would not personally operate such a model, highlighting the inherent legal and compliance risks tied to its access advantage. The discussion underscores a core market structure conflict: on-chain perp platforms like Hyperliquid thrive on open, low-barrier access, which regulated exchanges like Binance cannot replicate without abandoning their global compliance posture. However, this very advantage makes Hyperliquid a clear target for regulatory scrutiny. The UK FCA has already issued a warning against Hyperliquid for potentially offering unauthorized services to UK users, framing it as a financial services provider rather than neutral infrastructure. Historical cases like the CFTC's action against bZeroX and Ooki DAO further illustrate that regulators may pursue decentralized structures if they facilitate leveraged trading for retail users without proper controls. Meanwhile, regulated venues like Cboe are developing US-compliant "continuous futures" that mimic perpetual exposure, narrowing the product gap. Hyperliquid's long-term edge may increasingly hinge on its access model—the very feature most exposed to regulatory pressure. The key question is whether its "access premium" can withstand escalating legal challenges as on-chain perps gain mainstream attention.

marsbit54m ago

Even CZ Praised Hyperliquid as 'Awesome', But Its Biggest Moat Might Also Be Its Biggest Risk

marsbit54m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片