Ethena rallies 14.5% in a day, but THIS will limit further gains

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-09Last updated on 2026-04-09

Abstract

Ethena (ENA) rallied 14.6% in 24 hours, extending gains from earlier in the week, partly driven by a broader crypto market boost following former President Trump's ceasefire announcement. The project's plan to diversify its USDe stablecoin reserves into non-crypto assets has also contributed to positive momentum, aiming to address declining yields and supply since the October 2025 market downturn. Despite the recent surge, ENA's overall trend remains bearish. Technical analysis on the 1-day chart shows lower highs, with the RSI below 50 and declining OBV, indicating sustained selling pressure. The price has struggled to break the key $0.095-$0.10 resistance zone, where a cluster of short liquidations is located. The 4-hour chart structure is also bearish, and a break above $0.095 is needed to shift momentum bullishly. Traders are advised to consider taking profits near current levels, as the relief rally may be over, and a downward move could follow. The resistance band remains a significant barrier to further gains.

Ethena [ENA] has rallied 14.6% over the past 24 hours, extending the gains it made on Monday, the 6th of April. The crypto market saw a bullish boost from the short liquidations that followed President Trump’s ceasefire announcement.

Ethena plans to diversify its USDe reserve assets into non-crypto assets, which is why ENA has been rallying even before the announcement. The crypto rout since October 2025 saw declining USDe supply and yield.

The protocol’s founder, Gary Young, had said that Ethena was poorly positioned since that crash. Including non-crypto reserve assets will boost its falling yield and aid market performance.

ENA’s trend remains bearishly poised

The lower highs on the 1-day timeframe, highlighted in white, showed that Ethena continued to labor under a bearish trend. The RSI was below neutral 50, and the OBV was in a slump, too.

This showed that the trend, selling pressure, and market structure were all in favor of the sellers. Even the rally in recent days, though it was high-volume, was unable to convincingly smash past the $0.094 local highs.

This was a complication for ENA bulls. Or, in a way, some pessimistic participants would say it makes the picture clearer. The sweep of the $0.095-$0.10 local highs means that the Ethena relief rally is over.

A new leg downward can commence from these liquidity pockets.

Traders’ call to action – Sell

The past month’s liquidation heatmap showed a cluster of short liquidations from $0.094 to $0.10. This was the same band of resistance that the price has struggled to clear in the past 12 hours of trading.

The 4-hour timeframe’s structure remained bearish. The $0.095 level must be beaten for the swing structure to shift bullishly. A breakout and retest as support can inform bulls that the momentum might continue.

Until then, traders can maintain a bearish bias and look to take profits from the bounce.

Final Summary

Ethena has racked up sizeable gains since the start of the week and was aided by the ceasefire announcement and crypto market bounce.
The $0.095-$0.10 resistance level remained in place, and traders should be prepared to take profits in this area as the swing structure remained bearish.

Focus: Five Leading AI Stocks on Nasdaq

The report analyzes five Nasdaq-listed AI infrastructure stocks—Micron (MU), MaxLinear (MXL), AMD, Lumentum (LITE), and Vicor (VICR)—as distinct plays within the AI capital expenditure chain, rather than a single "AI trade." While all benefit from AI data center spending, they differ in their specific roles (e.g., memory, computing, optics, power, connectivity), financial resilience, and risk profiles. The author argues that the key question is not whether the AI narrative remains intact, but whether capital expenditure translates into real orders, earnings justify valuations, and portfolios can withstand high volatility. Historical data shows these stocks have significantly outperformed benchmarks but also experienced deeper drawdowns (~28% to -32%), highlighting their high-beta, high-volatility nature. An investment framework is proposed: core positions (e.g., MU, AMD) for stocks with stronger fundamental evidence; satellite positions (e.g., LITE, VICR) for high-potential, high-volatility names; and cautious observation (e.g., MXL) for smaller-cap ideas with unproven financials. The emphasis is on disciplined, phased buying during pullbacks—only when price corrections align with intact fundamentals and available risk budget—rather than emotional "buy-the-dip" strategies. Overall, AI infrastructure offers long-term potential, but success requires strict position sizing, role definition for each holding, and preparedness for significant volatility.

marsbit10m ago

marsbit10m ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Will Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

TL;DR: - According to reports, Standard Chartered Bank has published a research report on Uniswap, setting a 2030 price target of $100 for the UNI token. - The bank's core logic is that the tokenization of assets will drive demand for open DeFi liquidity, and Uniswap could capture significant trading volume and fee revenue. - However, most institutional-grade tokenized products are permissioned, and the example of BlackRock's BUIDL shows that DeFi still faces significant access barriers. Standard Chartered's $100 target for UNI by 2030 is based on the hypothesis that tokenized assets will grow massively and a significant portion will flow into open DeFi markets, requiring decentralized exchange platforms like Uniswap for liquidity. The bank forecasts tokenized assets could reach $4 trillion by 2028, with up to 30% in DeFi by 2030. The key question is whether tokenized assets like treasuries and funds will trade in open, decentralized markets or remain within closed, permissioned institutional systems. This directly impacts Uniswap's potential growth. A real-world example is BlackRock's BUIDL fund, which, while using UniswapX for trading, is strictly limited to pre-approved, whitelisted institutional participants. This highlights the current trend: institutions may leverage DeFi infrastructure but maintain strict control over access and transfers. Furthermore, for UNI's value to rise significantly, Uniswap must establish a clear value-capture mechanism, such as the approved fee switch and token burn proposal. Regulatory and interoperability hurdles also persist, as noted by bodies like the Financial Stability Board. In summary, Standard Chartered's bold prediction hinges on the future flow of tokenized asset liquidity. While it signals institutional recognition of DeFi's potential, the path to $100 depends on overcoming current permissioned models and enabling truly open, cross-asset liquidity pools on platforms like Uniswap.

Foresight News13m ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Will Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

Foresight News13m ago

Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily Editorial Team Casual Chat (June 17) This is an informal column sharing real-time thoughts from Odaily's editorial team on industry news, data, and events. The content is based on actual investment and observations, does not constitute investment advice, and aims to expand perspectives. Azuma shared recent operations: small-scale buys in crypto (mainly BTC) at relatively high levels, a small addition to HOOD stock, and participation in World Cup prediction markets. He also discussed Hyperliquid, noting that while its token HYPE has performed well, its high price may hinder the expansion of its HIP-3 ecosystem by making market creation cost-prohibitive, potentially limiting the platform to just one major market (trade.xyz). Suzz emphasized the importance of a calm mindset in investing, stating that markets offer perpetual opportunities. He warned against "hindsight bias," where past opportunities seem obvious, and stressed that the present always holds new chances for those with the right knowledge and temperament. Golem analyzed SpaceX's acquisition of AI tool Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion paid entirely in SpaceX stock. He speculated whether Musk's interests might work to keep SpaceX's trading volume and market cap high in the short term to reduce the actual equity cost of the deal, noting current high retail investor enthusiasm. Wenser shared a market outlook: cautiously bullish on BTC, monitoring SpaceX stock post-IPO for a potential rise, observing World Cup trends favoring strong teams, and noting the continued strength of Japanese and Korean stocks. He highlighted Anthropic's potential for a massive future IPO and the defensive investment logic in "picks and shovels" AI infrastructure. Qin Xiaofeng discussed trading HYPE around $56-$70, viewing the $50-$60 range as long-term support due to Hyperliquid's dominance in on-chain traditional asset trading and its substantial fee revenue used to buy back HYPE. On ETH, he noted a divide between disappointed crypto natives and bullish traditional investors like Tom Lee, personally viewing current ETH prices as undervalued.

Odaily星球日报25m ago

Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily星球日报25m ago

Under the Shock of Oil Prices and Inflation, Which Country Will Be the First to Sell Off Its Gold Reserves?

The article draws a parallel between the 2003 North American blackout and the potential collapse of the global financial system, framing the US dollar and Treasury market as the world's economic "power grid." It argues that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is creating a shockwave, starting with oil-importing emerging markets like Turkey, India, and Indonesia. As oil prices rise, these nations are forced to sell dollar-denominated assets—first US Treasuries, then potentially their gold reserves—to afford fuel. Turkey is highlighted as a key case, having sold nearly 90% of its Treasuries and begun tapping gold reserves when oil was between $70-$105/barrel. The article warns that if prices spike to $150-$160/barrel, global buffers like oil inventories and strategic reserves will be depleted. This could trigger a cascade: vulnerable nations, having exhausted assets, could face economic and political collapse (like Sri Lanka in 2022). Their forced asset sales would drive US Treasury yields higher, potentially past a critical threshold (around 5%), forcing the US to choose between a bond market crash or hyperinflation through massive money printing. Ultimately, the piece posits that the dollar's long-term decline is inevitable. The first domino to fall will likely be a fragile emerging market, signaling the start of a chain reaction that eventually threatens the core of the dollar system. The conclusion advises holding tangible assets like gold and energy, which cannot be printed, as a hedge against currency devaluation.

marsbit49m ago

Under the Shock of Oil Prices and Inflation, Which Country Will Be the First to Sell Off Its Gold Reserves?

marsbit49m ago

Michael Saylor Rejects Protocol Yield In Bitcoin Digital Asset Stack

Michael Saylor reinforces his stance that Bitcoin should remain a pure digital capital asset without built-in protocol yields, as outlined in his "Digital Asset Stack" framework. He argues Bitcoin's value stems from its scarcity and neutrality, and that introducing staking or native yield would undermine its core purpose. Instead, yield should be generated through financial products and capital market structures built on top of Bitcoin, such as bitcoin-backed credit or corporate vehicles like his company, MicroStrategy (now Strategy). This view defends Bitcoin's role as a base-layer reserve asset while creating space for yield-generating instruments in layers above it. The ongoing debate centers on whether investors will prefer Bitcoin's simplicity or be drawn to other crypto assets offering protocol-level income, with implications for valuation and capital flows as institutional products evolve.

bitcoinist1h ago

Michael Saylor Rejects Protocol Yield In Bitcoin Digital Asset Stack