三分钟了解韩国「Facebook」支持的公链 Klaytn

深潮TechFlowPublished on 2022-08-09Last updated on 2022-08-09

Abstract

Klaytn 正在为 Klaytn 2.0 做准备,它包括扩展 L2 解决方案、元宇宙文件、创建 DAO 的 DAO (工具)以及更多的基础设施。

Klaytn 正在为 Klaytn 2.0 做准备,它包括扩展 L2 解决方案、元宇宙文件、创建 DAO 的 DAO (工具)以及更多的基础设施。

Klaytn 是韩国的(非)官方公链,于 2019 年推出,它是:

OpenSea 支持的 4 个区块链之一;

TVL 在 DeFi 中排名第 14 位;

$KLAY 按市值排名第 66 位。

然而,韩国以外的人很少听说过它,在这次的 KBW 中,让我们来一起了解它。

Klatyn 得到了韩国的「Facebook」—— Kakao 的支持。Kakao 是韩国使用最多的短信应用,拥有 5300 万活跃用户。而这些用户可以在 Kakao 应用中使用 Klaytn 的区块链钱包。可以想像,在 Facebook 的 Messenger 或 WhatsApp 中拥有一个 Ethereum 钱包,会给 Web3 带来多大的流量。

Klatyn 最初是以太坊的一个分叉,它通过治理委员会(GC)专注于可扩展性和性能。它的运营商是 DAO 和跨国组织,如:

LG;

MakerDAO;

Binance;

Hashed/Ozys;

Kakao 等等。

多亏了那些坚定的支持者,Klaytn 才能成为了第二个集成在 OpenSea 上 的公链,甚至在 Polygon 或 Solana 之前。正如他们在 KBW 的团队成员告诉我的那样,他们在 OpenSea 的早期就接触了 OpenSea,当时 NFT 板块还没有那么火热。

Klaytn 的 DeFi 生态同样在 4 月份遭受到了打击,TVL 从 12 亿美元下降到目前的 4.15 亿美元。当前,其链上最受欢迎的 dApp 是:

DEX——KLAYswap 和 Kokonutswap;

借贷市场 Klapfinance;

流动性 KLAY 质押;

虽然 KlaySwap 占领了其 50% 的 TVL。

考虑到这一点,Klaytn 的第一目标是元宇宙。Klaytn 首席 Sangmin SEO 在 KBW 上介绍了他对 Klaytn 在加密货币生态系统中的愿景和定位。

我参加了他的演讲,这是他说的内容:

忘记 TPS。区块链上的不同元宇宙用户体验需要低延迟,交易延迟=交易被纳入区块的时间 - 交易被提交给网络的时间,这是一个输入和接收输出之间的时间延迟。

根据 Klaytn 自己的研究,Klaytn 的交易延迟最低,平均为 2.1 秒。 其次是 NEAR 在 2 到 5 秒之间,Solana 在 2 到 30 秒之间,而 Polygon 平均为 10.9 秒,而且还经常超过 100 秒。

更重要的是,Klaytn 拥有 1 秒的区块生成时间和即时的最终确认时间。作为比较,$ETH 需要 14 次网络确认才能被纳入区块链上的一个区块中。

不过,如果按每秒交易量(TPS)计算,它并没有使 Klaytn 成为最快的区块链。在 4k TPS 时,它远远落后于 Polygon、Fantom 或 Solana,但 Klaytn 正计划对此进行改进。

最后,Klaytn 正在为 Klaytn 2.0 做准备,它包括扩展 L2 解决方案、元宇宙文件、创建 DAO 的 DAO (工具)以及更多的基础设施。

Related Reads

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

"Glue Finance founder argues Ethereum's current price underperformance stems from its 'unfinished machine' status. Despite record usage and settlement value in 2026, ETH remains below its 2021 peak because the protocol's continued development creates a dependency on the Ethereum Foundation for guidance and fixes. Key issues include centralized L2 sequencers, governance-based freezes (as seen with Arbitrum), state bloat, a vulnerable public mempool, and looming quantum computing threats. This 'dependency discount' prevents ETH from accruing the 'ossification premium' that markets award to immutable, trustless systems like Bitcoin. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed escape paths: a 'war mode' shift towards centralization for speed (which would sacrifice Ethereum's core value), or simply replacing the EF with another governing body. The only solution is the 'Manhattan Plan' or 'Lean Ethereum': a concerted, accelerated effort to complete and then *freeze* the protocol's neutral core. This involves finalizing critical upgrades in consensus (Lean Consensus), scaling (targeting 1 trillion gas/sec), quantum resistance (leanXMSS signatures), and full ZK-provable execution. The goal is to pass the 'walk-away test'—where Ethereum could run forever, neutrally, without the EF. Success would transform Ethereum into the first programmable, quantum-resistant, immutable global settlement layer, flipping its current discount into a unique 'eternity premium' that surpasses Bitcoin's. Failure—stagnation or trading neutrality for speed—would relegate it to being a slower, less trustworthy competitor."

marsbit7m ago

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

marsbit7m ago

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

Glue Finance founder argues that Ethereum's current price underperformance, despite high on-chain activity, stems from its incomplete state and lingering dependency on central stewards like the Ethereum Foundation. The core thesis is that the market is discounting ETH not for lack of use, but because the protocol remains a "machine under construction." Key unresolved issues include centralized L2 sequencers with limited escape hatches, state bloat, vulnerable public mempools, and the looming quantum computing threat. This perpetual "work-in-progress" status forces reliance on a small group of maintainers, undermining the network's promise of credible neutrality and immutability. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed paths: a "wartime mode" of centralizing for speed (surrendering Ethereum's unique value) or merely replacing the Foundation with another governing entity. The only solution is to complete and then "freeze" the protocol's neutral core through a focused "Manhattan Project" dubbed "Lean Ethereum." This project aims to bundle critical upgrades—consensus layer overhaul, massive scaling via ZK-proofs, quantum resistance, and statelessness—into a decisive push to finalize the base layer. Once the core rules are cryptographically solidified and beyond anyone's control (passing the "walk-away test"), Ethereum would shed its dependency discount and earn a "rigidity premium" for its credible neutrality and programmability, potentially surpassing Bitcoin's valuation. The race is between completing this hardening and the risks of protocol capture or stagnation.

链捕手9m ago

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

链捕手9m ago

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit1h ago

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit1h ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit1h ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片