「影子联储主席」哈塞特发声:下周美联储应该降息,预计 25 基点

深潮Published on 2025-12-04Last updated on 2025-12-05

不过,德银认为即使哈塞特上任,实际执行降息仍面临重重障碍。

撰文:赵颖

来源:华尔街见闻

哈塞特表示美联储应在下周会议上降息,并预计降息幅度为 25 个基点。目前正值特朗普准备提名新任美联储主席之际,市场对货币政策走向的关注度骤升。

周四,「影子联储主席」、白宫国家经济委员会主任哈塞特(Kevin Hassett)在接受 Fox News 采访时表示,从美联储理事和地区联储主席近期的表态来看,「他们现在似乎更倾向于降息」。他强调自己希望在长期内「实现更低的利率水平」,并表示如果市场就 25 个基点形成共识,「我会接受」。

特朗普本周早些时候表示,计划在 2026 年初宣布美联储主席人选,并已确定最终候选人。他近日多次公开称赞哈塞特,并在白宫活动中暗示其可能获得提名。若提名推进,特朗普盟友正讨论将哈塞特目前的职位交由财政部长贝森特兼任。

不过,德银认为即使哈塞特上任,实际执行降息仍面临重重障碍。到 2026 年中期,美国经济基本面可能不支持大幅降息,加上美联储内部鹰派阻力,激进宽松政策难以实现。

长期宽松目标与短期现实妥协

哈塞特在采访中明确表达了对更低利率水平的长期追求,但同时展现出务实态度。他表示,如果联邦公开市场委员会围绕 25 个基点形成共识,他愿意接受这一幅度。

被问及若获提名将追求多少次额外降息时,哈塞特回避了具体数字,强调美联储主席的职责是「对数据高度敏感」,需要考虑利率调整对通胀和就业的影响。这一表态显示出他试图在政策倾向与央行独立性之间寻求平衡。

提名进程加速推进

特朗普近日频繁释放哈塞特可能获得提名的信号。在周二的白宫活动中,特朗普公开表示:「我想这里还有一位潜在的美联储主席,我不知道谁能这么说——潜在的。他是一位受人尊敬的人,我可以告诉你们。谢谢你,Kevin。」

哈塞特本人对提名保持谨慎态度,称「总统正在考虑多位候选人,能与一些优秀人士出现在同一份名单上是我的荣幸。我们会看看结果如何」。特朗普已表示将在 2026 年初宣布最终人选。

市场预期面临现实考验

德银对市场关于「鸽派转向」的乐观情绪发出警示。该行指出,到 2026 年中期,美国经济基本面可能不支持大幅降息,美联储委员会内部的鹰派成员也将构成阻力。

投资者应警惕对激进宽松货币政策的过度定价。德银认为,最终的政策路径很可能远比市场预期更为温和与中性,即使哈塞特成功上任,其政策执行也将受到多重现实约束。

Related Reads

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2h ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片