DAT公司股价为何在加密暴跌中领跌?

比推Published on 2025-10-13Last updated on 2025-10-13

作者:David,深潮 TechFlow

原标题:加密大暴跌后,DAT 公司们的股票还好吗?


10日下午,特朗普总统在Truth Social上宣布对中国商品征收100%关税。这个消息瞬间引爆了全球金融市场的恐慌情绪。

随后的24小时内,加密货币市场经历了历史上最大规模的清算事件,超过190亿美元的杠杆头寸被强制平仓。比特币从117,000美元急速下挫,一度跌破102,000美元,当日跌幅超过12%。

美股市场同样难逃厄运。10月10日收盘时,标普500指数下跌2.71%,道琼斯工业平均指数下跌878点,纳斯达克综合指数下跌3.58%,均创下4月以来最大单日跌幅。

然而,真正的重灾区,是那些将加密资产作为财库储备的 DAT(Digital Asset Treasury)公司。

MicroStrategy 作为最大的企业比特币持有者,其股价同样未能幸免;其他的加密资产储备公司,跳水情况更加明显。根据盘后交易数据,投资者还在持续抛售。

对于这些同时暴露在加密市场和股票市场双重风险下的公司来说,最坏的时刻已经过去了么?

为什么DAT公司跌得更狠?

DAT公司首先要面对的是资产负债表的直接冲击。以MicroStrategy为例,该公司持有约639,835枚比特币,当比特币价格下跌12%,意味着其资产价值瞬间蒸发近100亿美元。

这种损失在会计准则下必须计入“未实现损失”。虽然只要不卖出就不是真正的亏损,但财报上的数字却是实实在在的。

作为投资者,你看到的是一家公司的核心资产在快速贬值。这里面还有关于市场信心的乘数效应。

2025年初,MicroStrategy股票的净资产价值(NAV)溢价曾高达2倍,但到9月底已经压缩到1.44倍;目前差不多在1.2左右。

其他的一些公司,mNAV几乎都在朝着1回归,有些已经跌到了1以下。这些数字的变化反映了一个残酷的现实,市场对 DAT 模式的信心,在极端行情中正在动摇。

在牛市中,投资者愿意给予这些公司溢价,叙事可以是加密创新的先锋。但当市场转向时,同样的故事变成了不必要的风险敞口。

非比特币一类的加密货币,在这轮杠杆导致的大暴跌中遭受了巨大的技术性损害,有的甚至瞬间砸到归零;即使是大市值的山寨币,也因为流动性不足出现腰斩甚至更多跌幅。

而持有这些资产的公司股票,成为了市场情绪恶化的首选做空标的。

当市场恐慌时,投资者需要快速减仓。比特币市场虽然是24/7交易,但大额卖出会严重影响价格。相比之下,在纳斯达克卖出MSTR这样的股票要容易得多。

卖出价值数百亿美元的黄金不会扰乱市场,但卖出700亿美元的比特币可能会导致价格崩溃并引发大规模清算;这种流动性差异让DAT公司的股票成为了资金快速撤离的通道。

更糟糕的是,许多机构投资者有严格的风控红线。当波动率超过某个阈值时,他们必须减仓,不管愿不愿意。而DAT公司恰恰是波动率最高的标的之一。

说个不恰当的比喻,如果普通科技公司是坐在一条船上,那么DAT公司就像是把两条船绑在了一起,一条在股市的中航行,一条在加密市场中挣扎。

当两边同时遭遇恶劣天气时,它们承受的冲击不是相加,而是相乘。

谁最惨,谁最抗跌?

翻看前一个交易日的DAT公司跌幅榜单,你能明显发现的规律是,越小的公司,跌得越狠。

Forward Industries跌了15.32%,它的mNAV只有0.053。BTCS Inc.跌了12.70%,Helius Medical Tech跌了12.91%。

这些市值不到1亿美元的小公司,在恐慌中几乎找不到买家。相比之下,MicroStrategy虽然是最大的比特币持有者,跌幅却只有4.84%。

这背后的逻辑很简单:流动性。

当恐慌来临时,小盘股的买卖价差会急剧扩大,一个稍大的卖单就能把股价砸穿。

对市值相对大一些的 DAT 来说,MicroStrategy的mNAV只有1.28倍,几乎是按照持币价值在交易。市场给这些公司的估值,基本就是其加密资产价值加上一点点溢价。当加密市场崩盘时,它们没有其他业务可以缓冲。

当一家公司的市值几乎等于其持有的加密资产价值时(mNAV接近1),这意味着市场认为这家公司除了囤币之外,没有任何附加价值。

Bitmine的 mNAV 是0.98,其他没有mNAV 精确数据的公司估计也会很低。这些公司实际上已经变成了披着上市公司外衣的加密 ETF。

问题是,既然现在有真正的比特币等 ETF 可以买,投资者为什么还要通过这些公司来间接持有?

这可能解释了为什么在恐慌中,这些低mNAV的公司跌幅反而更大。它们既承担了加密资产的风险,又承担了股票市场的风险,却没有提供任何额外价值。

再过几个小时美股就要开盘。经过周末的冷静期,市场情绪是否会好转?那些跌幅超过10%的小型DAT公司,会继续被抛售还是会有抄底资金进场?

从数据来看,mNAV低于1的公司可能存在超跌的机会,但也可能是价值陷阱。毕竟,当一种商业模式本身就受到质疑时,便宜未必是买入的理由。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议
DAT

Related Reads

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

Title: Upbit's Rushed Counterattack to Reclaim Stablecoin Market Share Facing a dramatic shift in South Korea's stablecoin market, leading exchange Upbit launched a promotional campaign from July 26 to August 9, waiving the 0.05% trading fee for stablecoins paired with the Korean Won (KRW) and rapidly listing new stablecoins like RLUSD and USDG. This move is a direct response to its plummeting market share in this sector. Historically a duopoly with Bithumb, the market has been reshaped since October 2025 when Coinone permanently removed fees for USDC trading. By June 2026, Coinone led with 34.8% of stablecoin volume, followed by Bithumb (31.1%) and Upbit (30.1%). This contrasts sharply with the overall crypto market, where Upbit commands 60%. The data shows stablecoin demand is highly sensitive to fees, as users primarily buy them to transfer capital overseas for derivatives trading or forex arbitrage. South Korean exchanges have seen a net outflow of stablecoins for 18 consecutive months, totaling approximately 14.9 trillion KRW, underscoring their role as a cross-border capital conduit. Upbit's limited-time promotion initially boosted its daily stablecoin volume by 162%, but the surge was almost entirely in USDT (98.1% of volume). The newly listed stablecoins saw negligible, fleeting interest. Furthermore, the promotional effect quickly waned in the second week, with volume dropping 33% on weekdays. A concurrent weakening of the KRW also contributed to the trading spike, independent of the fee waiver. The analysis suggests that once the promotion ends, Upbit is unlikely to retain its temporary gains unless it matches Coinone's permanent zero-fee policy, forcing a choice between market share and fee revenue. Upbit's strategic push may be less about immediate profit and more about preparing for future regulatory shifts. With South Korea's *Digital Asset Basic Act* on the horizon, which will regulate KRW-backed stablecoins, and following Dunamu's (Upbit's parent) integration into Naver Financial to build a payment ecosystem, securing a dominant position in the dollar stablecoin distribution channel holds long-term strategic value. However, potential regulatory conflicts could prevent Upbit from listing a future Naver-issued KRW stablecoin, making the current fight for dollar stablecoin flow even more critical.

marsbit5h ago

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

marsbit5h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru6h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru6h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片