CoinGlass подвергся крупной прокси-атаке, что привело к сбоям в доступе.

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2025-10-18Last updated on 2025-10-18

Платформа криптоаналитики CoinGlass неожиданно подтвердила, что стала жертвой сложной прокси-атаки, временно нарушившей доступ к сайту и услугам.


Крупномасштабная прокси-атака

По заявлению компании, атака представляла собой «крупномасштабный прокси-удар», нацеленный на инфраструктуру. Хотя CoinGlass утверждает, что сбой был временным, пользователи из разных регионов сообщили о недоступности платформы или ее медленной работе.

CoinGlass заявила:

We were targeted by a large-scale proxy attack earlier today, which temporarily affected website access. The issue has been resolved — our website is now fully accessible.

Thank you for your patience and support.

— CoinGlass (@coinglass_com) October 10, 2025

Сейчас платформа снова в сети и работает для большинства пользователей. CoinGlass сообщает, что ее инженерные и службы безопасности изучают «полный масштаб, происхождение и цели» атаки.

История продолжает развиваться. BeInCrypto будет предоставлять обновления по мере поступления новой информации.

The post CoinGlass подвергся крупной прокси-атаке, что привело к сбоям в доступе. appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Related Reads

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手5h ago

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手5h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片