How Starknet’s $82M inflows fueled 23% STRK price surge

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-10-07Last updated on 2025-10-07

Key Takeaways

What recent developments have fueled STRK’s 23% price surge?

Starknet’s integration as a Bitcoin execution layer, staking support, and rising liquidity inflows have driven the rally.

What signals suggest STRK may continue its upward momentum? 

Positive Funding Rates, declining sell pressure, and growing on-chain activity point to strong bullish potential.


Starknet [STRK] has witnessed several key developments over the past few days, and it’s only natural that this translates into growing demand for the asset.

The most recent update was the announcement of Starknet’s role as an execution layer for Bitcoin [BTC] and its support for staking, with 100 million STRK allocated to the initiative.

Other factors such as the massive liquidity inflow from both spot and on-chain investors have also contributed to this momentum. The effect? A 23% price surge for STRK, leading the entire cryptocurrency market, according to CoinMarketCap.

But what does this actually mean for price? AMBCrypto took a closer look at the market dynamics.

Liquidity inflow on the rise

STRK’s strong performance coincides with a massive inflow of new capital into the perpetual market.

At press time, the total value of this inflow stood at $82 million, pushing Open Interest up to $172 million, according to CoinGlass.

Contextually, such inflows do not necessarily determine whether the market is bullish or bearish—the Weighted Funding Rate provides that insight.

STRK Open interest weighted funding rate.

Source: CoinGlass

Data over the same period showed that investors are betting on the market’s upside potential, as the rate turned positive at 0.0345%.

This bullish sentiment was also reflected in the spot market, where investors have begun slowing down their sell-offs.

After peaking at $2.57 million, daily selling volume dropped sharply to $220,000 as of the 7th of October.

This combination of rising capital inflows and declining sell pressure paints a positive outlook for STRK’s price. Notably, on-chain investors are also playing a crucial role.

On-chain involvement in the rally

On-chain participation has grown significantly, mirroring the rise in market liquidity.

Daily Active Addresses (DAA) reached a new high of 51,100, as of writing, rebounding from previous declines per Artemis.

STRK - Daily Active Addresses (Chain)

Source: Artemis

Alongside this, the number of transactions rose slightly to 3.4 million, signaling renewed market engagement.

This activity also translated into higher Total Value Locked (TVL), which jumped 4.4% to $221 million in the past day, its highest level since January, marking a reversal from the previous downtrend.

STRK’s near-term outlook

In the near term, STRK appears poised for a significant upside given the current market direction.

The liquidation map supports this view, showing large buy-side orders clustered around higher price levels, a setup that could trigger a strong upward move.

STRK liquidation heatmap.

Source: CoinGlass

Prices often move toward zones with high liquidity, which act like magnets pulling them in that direction.

Given Starknet’s continued ecosystem growth, rising inflows in the perpetual market, and increasing on-chain activity, STRK appears well-positioned for a strong upward move.

Share

Related Reads

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Charlie Munger's Calculated "Loss-Making Account" Many traders, drawn to speculative tools like futures contracts, often face repeated failures. As the article notes, unless one is a genius, such instruments should be avoided for long-term profit-seeking. Similarly, the practice of short selling is viewed with caution. The author firmly states a policy of not shorting, even when bearish, preferring to simply wait. The core reason? Successful short selling requires exceptionally difficult conditions to profit. Legendary investors Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger have themselves reflected on painful short-selling experiences. Munger highlights two critical flaws in the mathematical logic of shorting: 1. Asymmetrical Risk/Reward: A long position has a maximum loss of 100% but unlimited upside. A short position caps profit at 100% (if a stock falls to zero) but carries theoretically unlimited loss potential. 2. The "Promoter" Problem: Fraudulent or struggling companies can prolong their decline. As Munger said, "You can run out of money before the promoter runs out of ideas," meaning short sellers may be forced to cover positions at a loss before the company's true fate unfolds. The article cites Stanley Druckenmiller, a famed hedge fund manager. He once shorted 12 companies that all eventually went bankrupt. However, intense market rallies forced him to cover his positions within three weeks, resulting in massive losses—$200 million of his capital plus an additional $600 million. He concluded he likely never made money shorting in his career. His experience perfectly illustrates Munger's points: facing unlimited losses and being wiped out before being proven right. The conclusion is clear: for most investors, complex instruments like short selling and derivatives are not viable paths to stable, long-term gains. Self-reflection is advised before repeatedly wasting time and capital on such speculative strategies.

marsbit11m ago

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

marsbit11m ago

For Hedging, Buy Gold and Oil; For Explosive Growth, Buy AI; Bitcoin, the 'Outdated' Asset, Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin’s price has recently fallen sharply, hitting a two-month low near $66,000, with Ethereum also dropping to a three-month low. While surface explanations point to ETF outflows, geopolitical tensions, and corporate selling, a deeper issue is emerging: Bitcoin is losing a crucial asset competition. For years, Bitcoin thrived in a low-rate environment where investors sought alternatives amid inflation fears and dissatisfaction with traditional options. Now, the market landscape has shifted, leaving Bitcoin stuck in an "awkward middle ground," facing challenges on three fronts: 1. **As an inflation hedge, gold is winning.** Investors worried about persistent inflation are turning to tangible assets like gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers, which offer more direct pricing power and physical backing. 2. **For growth exposure, AI is winning.** Those seeking high growth now favor AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits, an area where Bitcoin's lack of cash flow puts it at a disadvantage. 3. **Within crypto, infrastructure and stablecoins are winning.** Even investors wanting crypto exposure have alternatives like exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and tokenization firms, whose performance is directly tied to real-world adoption and offers clearer operational leverage. The recent market reaction to inflation warnings highlights this shift. Instead of boosting Bitcoin as "digital gold," such news now drives flows toward traditional inflation-sensitive assets. Therefore, recent events like ETF outflows and corporate selling are seen not as causes, but as symptoms of this new reality. Capital has more compelling options, and investors are becoming more selective. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is no longer about it being a fraud or failed technology, but rather that **scarcity alone is no longer enough**. It is no longer seen as the best hedge, the best growth asset, or the only crypto play.

marsbit27m ago

For Hedging, Buy Gold and Oil; For Explosive Growth, Buy AI; Bitcoin, the 'Outdated' Asset, Enters a Bear Market

marsbit27m ago

SaaS Battle Royale: The Survivors Who Win All Share One Common Trait

**Summary** The AI revolution has triggered a "SaaS apocalypse," forcing a brutal market shakeout. The key dividing line is the pricing model. Companies like Snowflake and Datadog, which charge based on consumption (e.g., data processed or compute used), are thriving. AI workloads actively *generate* more demand for their services, fueling growth. Datadog's accelerating revenue is a prime example. Microsoft and Palantir, as platform/ecosystem players, also benefit by acting as essential channels for AI deployment. In contrast, traditional SaaS firms built on per-seat or per-task licensing (e.g., Intuit, Adobe) face direct pressure, as AI threatens to automate the very human tasks their software supports. Companies like Salesforce, a per-seat giant, are caught in the middle. While showing strong AI monetization (e.g., its Agentforce platform) and experimenting with consumption-based "Flex Credits," its stock remains under pressure, illustrating that the market rewards *completed* transitions, not just the intent. The recent Microsoft Build conference underscored key trends: AI is evolving from an assistant to an autonomous "agent," and platform providers like Microsoft are consolidating their control. The market's recovery is highly selective, focused on identifying which companies are "fed by AI" versus "eaten by AI." Future focus will be on the diffusion of this recovery to transforming companies and the real-world adoption data of AI agents like Microsoft Copilot.

marsbit44m ago

SaaS Battle Royale: The Survivors Who Win All Share One Common Trait

marsbit44m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片