NY Lawmakers Propose Electricity Tax for Heavy Crypto Mining

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-10-03Last updated on 2025-10-03

New York lawmakers have proposed a bill that would tax cryptocurrency mining operations, saying the industry’s high electricity use is driving up bills for residents and small businesses.

State Senator Liz Krueger and Assemblymember Anna Kelles introduced a new bill on October 1, known as Senate Bill S8518, that would charge mining firms based on the amount of power they consume each year. Revenue from the tax would go directly into the state’s Energy Affordability Programs, which assist households struggling to cover utility costs.

How the tax works?

The bill sets a tiered tax based on electricity consumption. Companies using between 2.25 and 5 million kilowatt-hours of electricity would pay 2 cents per kWh. Usage of 5 to 10 million kWh would be charged at 3 cents per kWh, while 10 to 20 million kWh would cost 4 cents per kWh.

The largest operations, using over 20 million kWh, would pay the steepest rate of 5 cents per kWh. It could also reach $1 million or more annually, depending on their overall energy consumption. If passed, the law would take effect in 2027.

Lawmakers cited research suggesting that Bitcoin mining has added roughly $79 million a year to household bills and $165 million to small businesses across New York. 

In 2023, electricity costs varied across different users: households paid about 22.25 cents per kWh, commercial users 18.01 cents, and industrial users 6.87 cents. Facilities powered entirely by renewable energy and not connected to the state grid would be exempt.

Rising mining costs

The bill comes after the price of mining a single Bitcoin exceeded $70,000 this year, and fears that higher taxes will render huge-scale, grid-based mining unviable. The bill also stated in its justification that New Yorkers are forced to pay higher bills as a result of unregulated proof-of-work crypto mining, and get little to no benefits from it.

Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and other cryptocurrencies use proof-of-work, which depends on vast networks of always-on computers with high electricity consumption. It could lead to environmental impacts, including air pollution, water consumption, and e-waste.

Other industries, such as AI and high-performance computing, also require large amounts of energy, sometimes even more than Bitcoin mining.

Also Read: Canaan Shares Soar 26% After 50,000-Rig Bitcoin Mining Deal


Mobile Only Image

Related Reads

Trump's 'Bitcoin Retirement Plan' Hits Roadblock: Democrats Claim It Endangers American Workers' Pensions?

Democratic Senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), along with Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), are urging the Labor Department to repeal a proposed rule that would open U.S. retirement savings accounts, like 401(k) plans, to investments in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. In a letter to Acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling, they argue the rule would endanger workers' financial futures and contradicts long-standing legal precedents under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The rule, stemming from a Trump executive order, would shift the legal standard for plan fiduciaries. Instead of requiring them to prove they conducted due diligence on volatile assets, it would presume prudence if they followed a specified process. The lawmakers warn this exposes the $14.2 trillion in 401(k) savings to highly volatile and less-regulated assets, citing FINRA warnings on crypto's risks and FBI data on massive crypto scam losses. The letter also alleges a conflict of interest, noting that President Trump's adult children manage the family's crypto business, which has raised billions. They claim the rule could allow the Trump family to profit at the expense of workers and retirees. Consumer advocates echo concerns that it could turn retirement savings into a lifeline for a risky industry. The Trump administration defends the rule as expanding worker choice, with officials stating it ends the department "picking winners and losers" and requires fiduciaries to follow a prudent process.

foresightnews_api1m ago

Trump's 'Bitcoin Retirement Plan' Hits Roadblock: Democrats Claim It Endangers American Workers' Pensions?

foresightnews_api1m ago

Rules Change Mid-Game, Polymarket’s Billion-Dollar Bitcoin Prediction Market Mired in Settlement Controversy

A nearly $150 million prediction market contract on Polymarket is in turmoil after the platform refused to settle in favor of traders who correctly predicted that MicroStrategy (now Strategy) would sell Bitcoin. The core dispute revolves around a sale of 32 BTC, which occurred between May 26-31 but was officially disclosed in an SEC 8-K filing on June 1. The original contract stated it would resolve to "Yes" if Strategy sold any Bitcoin before May 31, 11:59 PM ET, using public disclosures and on-chain data as proof. After the filing on June 1, traders who saw the disclosure rushed to buy "Yes" contracts, believing it was conclusive evidence. However, Polymarket's operators later added a rule that the disclosure itself must occur by the deadline, not just the transaction, invalidating the filing as proof. This retroactive rule change has sparked accusations of market manipulation, leaving traders like "willo2," who invested $527,000, facing total losses. The controversy highlights a deeper structural flaw in Polymarket's decentralized settlement system, which relies on UMA's optimistic oracle. Disputed resolutions are ultimately decided by a vote among UMA token holders, a mechanism critics say is vulnerable to manipulation by large holders ("whales") who can vote in their own financial interest rather than on objective facts. Data suggests a high concentration of voting power and significant overlap between voters and Polymarket traders. The dispute emerges as prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi are experiencing massive growth and seeking mainstream financial legitimacy, having recently secured regulatory approval from the U.S. CFTC. However, the incident underscores the unresolved tension between decentralized, token-vote-based settlement and the need for transparent, rules-based outcomes in high-stakes financial contracts.

foresightnews_api4m ago

Rules Change Mid-Game, Polymarket’s Billion-Dollar Bitcoin Prediction Market Mired in Settlement Controversy

foresightnews_api4m ago

Ethereum Foundation Researcher: Quantum Day Is Approaching, Plans to Complete Quantum-Resistant Migration by 2029

Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake discusses the implications of a recent quantum computing breakthrough by Google’s quantum AI team, which demonstrated a 10x efficiency improvement in Shor’s algorithm against the secp256k1 elliptic curve used in Bitcoin and Ethereum. Notably, Google kept key algorithmic details confidential, using zero-knowledge proofs to verify the result without disclosure—a first in academia. Shortly after, the core optimization was independently reproduced, and an open-source competition (ecdsa.fail) emerged, further improving the algorithm by 8.4%. Meanwhile, startup Oratomic published research suggesting that neutral-atom quantum architectures could break secp256k1 with only 10,000 physical qubits, accelerating the timeline for "Q-Day"—the day quantum computers can break widely used cryptography. Drake estimates a 50% probability of Q-Day by 2032 and a 10% chance by 2030, contrasting with the U.S. government’s more conservative 2035 forecast. He warns against panic but stresses timely migration to post-quantum cryptography. Ethereum plans to complete its migration by 2029, covering consensus, data, and execution layers with hash-based systems. The Foundation is also developing leanVM, a formally verifiable zkVM, and has launched two $1 million initiatives to advance SNARK-friendly cryptography.

foresightnews_api5m ago

Ethereum Foundation Researcher: Quantum Day Is Approaching, Plans to Complete Quantum-Resistant Migration by 2029

foresightnews_api5m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片