JPMorgan CEO: Fed Rate Cuts Unlikely, Stablecoins Pose No Risk

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-09-23Last updated on 2025-09-23

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said the US Federal Reserve may find it difficult to reduce interest rates unless inflation is high, and also said that stablecoins don’t currently pose a major risk to banks.

In an interview with CNBC-TV18 on Monday, he noted that inflation seems “a little stuck at 3%.” Dimon expressed hope for steady economic growth rather than rate cuts driven by a potential recession. He said, “If inflation does not go away, it’s going to be hard for the Fed to cut more.”

Market expectations of Fed cuts

Dimon’s remarks contrast with market expectations, as some investors expect up to five rate cuts over the next year.

CME FedWatch data shows the market anticipates further modest cuts: 25 basis points in late October and another in early December. The Fed’s own projections indicate the possibility of two more cuts before the end of the year, with further cuts possible in 2026.

Meanwhile, US inflation data for August showed a 0.4% increase, bringing the year-over-year rate to 2.9%, above the Fed’s 2% target.

Impact on crypto markets

The lower interest rate is expected to boost the crypto markets. The first rate reduction of 2025 came as the Fed cut rates by 25 basis points, bringing the federal funds target range to 4.00%-4.25%. This move pushed Bitcoin above $117,500, a level not seen in over a month.

Both the crypto and finance communities are closely watching the U.S. Federal Reserve’s upcoming rate cut decision. BitMine Chairman Tom Lee said that if the Fed lowers rates, Bitcoin, Ethereum, the Nasdaq 100, and smaller companies could benefit the most.

Clear stablecoin guidelines needed 

On the topic of stablecoins, Dimon said he isn’t overly concerned about their impact on traditional banks. Still, he emphasized that financial institutions need to remain vigilant and understand the evolving space.

In the same interview, he said a stablecoin “if it’s like a mutual fund, probably needs rules like a mutual fund,” meaning it would need clear guidelines and protections for investors. Unlike a traditional mutual fund, however, a JPMorgan-issued coin could pay interest, highlighting the different structure and oversight needed.

Dimon also pointed out that certain individuals or countries may prefer holding dollars through stablecoins rather than using banks. Banks, including JPMorgan, are looking into stablecoin projects and may join forces with other institutions to launch a shared token.

Also Read: Central Banks Could Hold Bitcoin Like Gold by 2030: Deutsche Bank


Mobile Only Image

Related Reads

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手45m ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手45m ago

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

The article discusses how companies in the AI era are competing for talent through strategic "title arbitrage," or the renaming of key roles to reflect and attract new, high-value capabilities. It uses Palantir's creation of the "Forward-Deployed Engineer" (FDE) as a prime example. This title reframed client-facing technical work from a peripheral "implementation" role into a core, high-status engineering function. The move was strategic, allowing Palantir to attract talent that blended technical skill with business acumen and to dominate the market's perception of this capability. The piece argues that job titles are an organizational language that signals the value and authority of certain work. Effective new titles, like "Data Scientist" or "Site Reliability Engineer," emerge when a role's strategic importance genuinely outgrows its old name. Conversely, mere title inflation without substantive change is ineffective. For AI companies, particularly in B2B, this is a crucial strategy. AI transformation creates new high-leverage roles (e.g., "Legal Engineer," "GTM Engineer") that combine domain expertise with technical automation. By naming these roles, a company can help clients internally legitimize these change-makers. This, in turn, builds market mindshare, associating the company with the new capability. In conclusion, as AI blurs the lines between product and service, the ability to accurately name and organize the critical, client-adjacent work that defines product learning will be a key competitive advantage. The first to define this new organizational language plants a flag in the market's mind.

marsbit2h ago

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片