Belarus President Urges Banks to Expand Crypto Use as Sanctions Bite

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-09-10Last updated on 2025-09-10

Alexander Lukashenko, the President of Belarus, has instructed the country’s banks to expand adoption of cryptocurrencies as sanctions have significantly affected its economy. 

The state-owned Belarusian Telegraph Agency said on Tuesday that Lukashenko informed the leaders of Belarus’ central and commercial banks in a meeting that the use of digital tokens has to grow. The President said that a market this big needs to be open, well-regulated, and under reasonable control.

“Over the past five years, the national economy, and with it the Belarusian banking sector, has faced unprecedented challenges. The government and the National Bank have been given corresponding instructions. Now, act,” said the President. 

Lukashenko emphasized that the primary task for the National Bank and the entire system is maintaining price stability. On digital currencies, he said, using tokens in finance helps reduce the number of middlemen, make transactions happen automatically with smart contracts, and give users more control over their assets. 

“Cryptocurrency-based transactions are more common than ever today, and their role in making payments easier is growing. In the first seven months of this year, cryptocurrency exchanges processed $1.7 billion in external payments. Experts say it could reach $3 billion by the end of the year,” he said. 

Lukashenko’s current push comes just days after he instructed lawmakers to make the country’s cryptocurrency market laws clear. The country’s economy has suffered from declining exports as a result of widespread EU and US sanctions for supporting Russia’s war on Ukraine. 

Another Push for Crypto Adoption in Belarus 

According to Statista, an online statistics source, the number of crypto users in Belarus is expected to reach over 855,000 by 2026, up from 9.1 million people. The percentage of users is also expected to rise to 9.57%. 

Earlier in March, under President Lukashenko, the Mogilev region of the country started prepping for the cryptocurrency mining farms. This was followed by the announcement of plans to explore cryptocurrency mining, leveraging the country’s surplus electricity following U.S. President Donald Trump’s strategic reserve plan.

Also Read: US Files Forfeiture Action on $12M Funds Involved in Crypto Frauds


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit1h ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片