【比推每日新闻精选】知情人士：纳斯达克正在加强对持有加密货币的上市公司的审查；Stripe 与 Paradigm 孵化的支付公链 Tempo 已上线私有测试网；BlockSpaceForce 与 Mainnet Capital 合作推出加密对冲基金，目标管理规模 1 亿美元

比推Published on 2025-09-04Last updated on 2025-09-04

比推小编每日为您精选的Web3新闻：

【知情人士：纳斯达克正在加强对持有加密货币的上市公司的审查】

比推消息， 据The Information援引知情人士消息报道，纳斯达克正在加强对上市公司通过募资购买加密货币行为的监管，要求企业必须获得股东批准，并详细披露购币用途、风险以及对主营业务的影响，否则将面临停牌甚至退市处理。纳斯达克是绝大多数加密货币股票交易的交易所，目前要求一些公司在发行新股购买股票之前必须获得股东批准。

【Stripe 与 Paradigm 孵化的支付公链 Tempo 已上线私有测试网】

比推消息，据官方消息，Stripe 与 Paradigm 孵化的支付公链 Tempo 已上线私有测试网。Tempo 专为稳定币和现实世界支付打造，目标是提供低费用、支持以任意稳定币转账和支付 gas 费、可选隐私、以及超过 10 万 TPS。

首批合作伙伴包括 Anthropic、Coupang、德意志银行、DoorDash、Lead Bank、Mercury、Nubank、OpenAI、Revolut、Shopify、渣打银行、Visa 等。

Tempo 的应用场景覆盖全球收付、工资发放、嵌入式金融账户、快速低费的跨境汇款、24/7 结算的代币化存款、微支付、智能体支付等。Tempo 基于 Reth 构建，与 EVM 兼容。

【BlockSpaceForce与 Mainnet Capital 合作推出加密对冲基金，目标管理规模 1 亿美元】

比推消息，据 The Block 报道，新加坡加密咨询公司 BlockSpaceForce 宣布与本地持牌基金管理公司 Mainnet Capital 合作推出一支专注于投资加密相关上市公司的对冲基金，其中包括数字资产储备（DAT）类企业。目标资产管理规模为 1 亿美元。

【彭博分析师：REX-Osprey 将于下周推出首只狗狗币 ETF】

比推消息，彭博行业研究分析师Eric Balchunas在X 上称：“根据他们刚刚提交的招股说明书，Rex 似乎将于下周通过 40 法案推出一只狗狗币 ETF 。狗狗币看起来是第一个推出的，但招股说明书中还提到了特朗普、XRP 和 Bonk，所以这些也有可能在某个时候推出，我们拭目以待。” 据悉，该团队向美国证券交易委员会提交了REX-Osprey DOGE ETF 的招股说明书，交易代码为 DOJE。招股说明书中还提到了与 XRP、BONK、TRUMP 以及 BTC、ETH 和 SOL 相关的 ETF。

40法案是指1940年《投资公司法》，这是一项美国联邦法律，旨在规范从投资者那里汇集资金以实施共同投资策略的投资基金，以保护投资者免受利益冲突和欺诈。根据招股说明书，DOJE 寻求通过投资在开曼群岛成立的子公司 REX-Osprey DOGE (Cayman) Portfolio SP（即 DOGE 子公司）来获得参考资产的投资。

【美银预测美联储 9 月会议将出现严重内部分歧】

比推消息，据金十报道，美国银行预计 9 月份美联储利率决议将出现严重的内部分歧。鸽派成员沃勒、鲍曼、戴利及有望确认理事提名的米兰可能会推动进一步的降息，而鹰派成员如哈马克、博斯蒂克、穆萨利姆和施密德则强调通胀风险。即使 9 月会议上降息 25 个基点，委员会内部仍可能出现双向异议投票。

【孙宇晨回应 WLFI 黑名单事件：仅进行少量充值测试，不会影响市场】

比推消息， 针对 World Liberty Financial（WLFI）将其相关地址列入黑名单一事，孙宇晨回应称，其地址仅进行过少量交易所充值测试，金额非常低，随后也进行了地址分散操作，并未涉及任何买卖行为，因此不可能对市场造成影响。

Twitter：https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群：https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅： https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点，不构成投资建议
相关新闻

Related Reads

OpenSea Launches ERC-8257: A Tool Store for AI Agents, Unlock APIs by Buying an NFT

OpenSea has merged the ERC-8257 standard, an on-chain "Agent Tool Registry" that enables AI Agents to autonomously discover, pay for, and access tools. This standard allows developers to publish tools with programmable access rules (e.g., NFT ownership, subscriptions) and pricing directly on-chain. For example, an AI Agent needing a premium API can buy the required NFT itself and gain access without human intervention, turning NFTs into keys for the agent economy. The system works with complementary standards like ERC-8004 for agent identity and x402 for payments. A live demo shows an NFT appraisal tool offering discounted rates to holders of a specific NFT collection. ERC-8257 aims to decentralize tool distribution and access control, allowing any on-chain asset to grant utility to AI agents. The SDK is available for building on Ethereum and Base.

marsbit35m ago

OpenSea Launches ERC-8257: A Tool Store for AI Agents, Unlock APIs by Buying an NFT

marsbit35m ago

Bitcoin Gets Rejected At This Level For The First Time In 5 Years, Here Are The Targets

Bitcoin has been rejected at a crucial long-term resistance level around $83,000, marking its first failure at this macro price point in five years. According to analyst Chiefy, this trendline has defined major cycle tops since 2021 and acted as a key support in early 2025. The recent rejection saw Bitcoin drop to $74,000 before a slight recovery to $76,580, aligning with a significant moving average historically linked to major market turns. If the current support around $74,000 breaks, the analyst projects three potential downside targets: $68,000, $61,000, and an extreme target near $48,000, which aligns with the weekly 350 MA. Market sentiment has shifted to fear, with the Crypto Fear & Greed Index at 39, indicating growing caution among investors.

bitcoinist2h ago

Bitcoin Gets Rejected At This Level For The First Time In 5 Years, Here Are The Targets

bitcoinist2h ago

Bankless Founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Bankless founder David Hoffman explains his decision to sell all his ETH. He clarifies this is not due to bearishness on Ethereum itself, which he remains extremely optimistic about, but rather because he believes the core "ETH is Money" narrative he championed has already been priced in. Hoffman argues that for ETH to achieve status as a global reserve currency, Ethereum needed to execute perfectly across all layers—governance, technology, L2 coordination, and market dominance—faster than competitors. While Ethereum has performed admirably and earned its current valuation, the window for a fundamental revaluation of ETH upward has likely closed. Key factors include: the clear market correlation between L1 chain revenue/fees and native asset price (evident with SOL and NEAR); the failure of the "strong version" of crypto (ideological, self-sustaining) to maintain lasting mainstream appeal beyond a brief period; and the reality that Ethereum's architecture acts as a "giver," providing security and tokenization at cost, which benefits other monies (like stablecoins) as much as or more than ETH itself. He concludes that Ethereum's success will increasingly accrue to its applications and L2s (following a "fat app" theory), with ETH structurally positioned to capture only minimal value. Therefore, he sold to reallocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

marsbit2h ago

Bankless Founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

marsbit2h ago

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手2h ago

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手2h ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

Circle raised $222 million for its proprietary Layer-1 blockchain, Arc, positioning itself not just as a stablecoin issuer but as the owner of the settlement infrastructure USDC relies on. This move, backed by investors like BlackRock and Apollo, highlights a significant structural conflict unaddressed by the GENIUS Act of 2025. While the act focuses on stablecoin reserves and issuer oversight, it remains silent on the market structure implications of an issuer controlling the underlying network—a scenario akin to a currency issuer also owning the payment rails. Traditionally, financial regulations separate issuers from settlement infrastructure to ensure neutrality. With Arc, Circle gains control over transaction ordering, fees, and network rules, potentially favoring USDC over competitors. The article argues that this creates a permanent structural temptation, even if no abuse occurs. The solution lies in applying established market infrastructure principles: mandating neutral transaction ordering, transparent fee schedules, and governance separated from Circle’s commercial interests. The current pre-mainnet phase offers a critical window for regulators to establish these rules before Arc becomes entrenched. Once operational, enforcing changes would be costly and disruptive. The core question remains: should a regulated stablecoin issuer be allowed to own the settlement network its competitors must use? The GENIUS Act doesn’t answer this, but Circle’s Arc strategy makes it urgent.

marsbit2h ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片