Mu Digital:将亚洲 20 万亿信贷市场搬进链上世界

深潮Published on 2025-09-03Last updated on 2025-09-04

亚洲20万亿美元信贷市场如何重塑 DeFi 格局?

作者:Cointelegraph

编译:深潮TechFlow

Mu Digital 联合创始人兼 CEO Patrick Hizon 探讨了为何亚洲规模达 20 万亿美元的信贷市场对去中心化金融(DeFi)至关重要,并分享了关于流动性和可组合收益产品的需求,以及平台启动的关键里程碑。

长期以来,投资机会的获取一直受到无形界限的影响——那些符合条件享受专属金融产品的人,与那些无法享受的人之间的差距。尽管区块链降低了全球金融领域的诸多壁垒,但现实是,一些最具吸引力的机会仍然局限于传统体系,普通投资者难以触及。

Mu Digital 正是致力于解决这一问题的项目之一。这一平台由前投资银行家创立,他们亲眼目睹了亚洲的收益产品如何仅限于机构和超高净值投资者。借助 Cointelegraph Accelerator 计划的支持,Mu Digital正在构建基础设施,将亚洲信贷市场引入链上世界——以无需许可、可组合的形式提供给全球去中心化金融(DeFi)用户。

在本次采访中,Mu Digital 的联合创始人兼 CEO Patrick Hizon 深入探讨了亚洲信贷机会获取受限的问题、公司将现实世界资产打包成适用于DeFi的产品的策略,以及 Cointelegraph Accelerator 在推动采用方面所扮演的角色。

资料来源:Mu Digital

Cointelegraph:是什么启发了 Mu Digital 的使命?你如何定义你们试图解决的问题?

Patrick Hizon: Mu Digital 的诞生源于一种根本性的挫败感:亚洲最好的投资机会对普通投资者来说是不可见的。两位联合创始人都在亚洲地区的投资银行领域建立了职业生涯,我们的生存依赖于不断发现新的交易机会。

我们亲眼目睹了企业支持的收益产品如何始终被保留给少数金融机构和超高净值个人。这种“旧世界”金融系统的规则被设计成一种准入门槛。

我们创立 Mu Digital 的初衷是将亚洲最优风险调整后的收益引入链上世界,让任何拥有 Web3 钱包的人都能享受到。然而,要为 Web3 用户提供具有吸引力的解决方案,需要专业人士来负责交易的寻源、尽职调查和承销。此外,为了真正释放区块链技术的潜力,这些投资必须以无需许可、可组合的形式交付,让任何 DeFi 用户都能访问。

CT:你如何看待链上数字资产的演变?为什么现在是将现实世界信贷引入链上的合适时机?

PH:金融体系正处于范式转变的边缘。全球范围内的政府、监管机构、金融机构、建设者和用户都认识到了基于区块链的金融的力量。虽然采用的速度在全球范围内会有所不同,但资本流向链上是不可避免的。

麦肯锡的一项研究预测,到 2025 年,稳定币的价值将达到 4000 亿美元,到 2028 年将达到 2 万亿美元。这些资金会流向哪里?除了交易、支付和跨境汇款,这些流动性将需要可信的收益替代方案。

虽然 DeFi 中已经出现了许多有趣的创新,但目前还没有足够的链上基础设施来支撑这场资本爆发式增长。如今整个 DeFi 市场的规模为 1550 亿美元。我们相信,亚洲太平洋地区规模达 20 万亿美元的信贷市场将在为稳定币的爆发式增长提供可持续且可扩展的环境方面发挥巨大作用。

CT:在 20 万亿美元的亚太信贷市场中,你们最先瞄准哪些细分领域?投资者可以期待什么样的期限、抵押品和风险状况?

PH我们的优势在于能够全面覆盖整个亚洲——这是我们作为投资银行高管时的立足之地。我们希望将整个信贷风险曲线引入链上:从主权债务、企业债务(从投资级到高收益债券),到私人信贷交易(由投资银行、私募股权和信贷基金发起并进行尽职调查)。

我们资产的收益率在 4% 到 20% 之间。DeFi 用户的风险收益范围很广,我们希望提供涵盖各种风险收益的解决方案。

更重要的考虑是如何将这些资产包装成 DeFi 用户所需要的形式。我们的解决方案必须具备高度流动性、可组合到 DeFi 基础设施中,并且最重要的是,提供与市场上其他 DeFi 收益产品竞争的收益。

CT:合作伙伴关系在你们的战略中扮演什么角色?在哪些领域你们希望深入合作?

PH我们认为,将现实世界信贷引入链上是 DeFi 的基础层。我们的产品旨在成为其他 DeFi 基础模块(the base DeFi Lego)的底层基础,供其进一步构建。

DeFi 需要一个更好的基础层。像菲律宾或印度尼西亚这样的新兴市场的主权信贷目前可以提供 7-8% 的收益率,是当前美国国债收益率的两倍。此外,这些收益的稳定性远远优于加密原生的收益产品,这些产品通常会受到加密市场整体波动的影响。

我们的产品将能够组合到所有让 DeFi 收益操作变得有趣的类别中:收益交易平台、金库、货币市场、去中心化交易所以及永续交易所。Mu Digital 专为 DeFi 而生,我们欢迎任何寻求优质收益来源的有趣项目合作。

CT:到目前为止,Cointelegraph Accelerator 在你们的策略和发展过程中发挥了什么作用?

PH:我要特别感谢我们加速器项目领导 Paul(No-BS 导师)和 Anthony(Dip 先生)。从一开始,他们就根据我们的经验以及我们的相对优势和劣势,向我们提供了定制化的建议。

在 Web3 中,容易沿用“上一个周期中有效的东西”来构建产品。但 Paul 和 Anthony 都经历过多个 Web3 周期,同时拥有丰富的 Web2 背景,这也让 Cointelegraph Accelerator 与其他加速器项目有所不同。

创业就是创业,无论是在 Web2 还是 Web3,只有那些在两者中都曾深度参与的人,才能制定出在快速变化的领域中取得成功的最佳策略。

我们期待与 Cointelegraph Accelerator 的持续合作。

CT加速器的社区和平台在哪些方面支持了你们的进展?

PH: Cointelegraph Accelerator 提供的不仅仅是营销和公共关系支持。他们作为战略合作伙伴,帮助我们在成长为一个早期项目的过程中思考各种问题。

最初,他们为我们提供了关于产品市场契合度、代币经济学和区块链安全性的基础指导,而随着我们获得更多的市场关注,现在已经发展成为针对我们不断变化的挑战的定期会议,这些挑战只会随着我们所经历的牵引力而增长!

Cointelegraph 的全球影响力帮助我们将市场范围从亚洲扩展到美国和欧洲。加速器帮助我们在Web3 领域开展了项目推介、活动和业务发展推介。

我们收到了有关我们的募资演示文稿、网站品牌和文案的直接反馈,甚至包括如何有效拍摄 vlog 内容以推广创始人形象的讨论!

CT:你们之前职业生涯中的哪些经历对现在 Mu Digital 的构建和领导方式影响最大?

PH我们都是 2021 年 DeFi 夏季的早期探索者,并且从 2017 年 ICO 初期就开始关注代币化的概念。虽然早期的许多实验很有趣,但我们发现产品设计和资产稳定性方面存在明显缺陷,尤其是基于我们在传统金融领域的背景。收益本不应该是一个投机性或波动性产品。

话虽如此,我们还是喜欢在链上探索。我们看到了去中心化系统的潜力,它不仅能向大众开放,还能通过组合性创新金融产品。

我们知道,链下存在着一条完整的风险曲线,只是尚未被引入到链上。同时我们也清楚,这种风险曲线的获取难度很高——即使在投资银行领域,寻找交易的能力也参差不齐。

我们看到了将我们的专业知识引入链上经济并为亚洲带来链上收益的机会。

CT:随着你们朝着上线迈进,哪些里程碑对你们最重要?你们如何判断自己是否走在正确的轨道上?

PH在我们迈向上线的过程中,有三个里程碑对我们来说至关重要。首先,完成并启动我们的首批收益交易。这些证明 Mu Digital 能够以机构标准在亚洲寻找、尽职调查和代币化信贷机会。

第二,围绕这些产品构建深度流动性。迄今为止,需求一直是所有试图将链下资产引入链上的协议面临的最大障碍。没有流动性的准入,只会让市场更加封闭。第三,可组合性:看到其他 DeFi 协议将我们的产品作为“DeFi 乐高”进行整合,将是我们真正融入生态系统的标志。

当以下三件事同时发生时,我们就知道我们走在了正确的轨道上:普通用户正在赚取他们之前从未能获取的收益;机构投资者对我们的承销足够自信,将资本分配到链上;DeFi 的建设者们将 Mu Digital 的收益视为他们可以围绕构建的基础模块。这时,我们不仅是在推出一个产品,而是在为一个新的金融系统奠定基础。

ointelegraph Accelerator 已经与 Injective 合作开启了一个独特的项目申请。申请截止日期为 10 月 17 日,项目将于 11 月 3 日正式启动。

Related Reads

Wall Street Takes Over Bitcoin and Stablecoins, But Where Are the Real Profit Opportunities for Retail Investors?

Wall Street is taking over Bitcoin and stablecoins, but where can retail investors really make money now? The common narrative is that Wall Street's dominance via ETFs and regulated stablecoins has structurally ended the era of easy 100x returns from altcoins. While this is true for Bitcoin and stablecoins, which are becoming traditional financial products, it's only half the story. Other crypto sectors are failing for their own reasons. GameFi is largely dead, with 93% of projects failed. NFTs are at multi-year lows with most collections losing all value. Memecoins persist but overwhelmingly benefit insiders and whales at the expense of late retail buyers. These sectors aren't being consumed by TradFi; they've exhausted their growth narratives. The real opportunities for retail in the next 6-12 months lie elsewhere: 1. **Prediction Markets:** Platforms like Polymarket have seen explosive growth (21x in a year) with a genuine, active retail user base. The utility of forecasting events provides sustainable demand beyond mere speculation. 2. **DeFi Yield:** While the era of 1000% APY farms is over, sustainable yields of 4-8% are available through liquid staking, regulated stablecoin platforms, and RWA lending. 3. **Select Altcoins:** If Bitcoin breaks its all-time high, a selective altcoin season could emerge. The favorable bets would be on ETH, assets within the Base and Solana ecosystems with real users, and asymmetric opportunities in AI-crypto and DePIN presales. The most likely market scenario (45% probability) is sideways action, making asset selection far more critical than broad market momentum. The playbook has changed. Actionable steps: Focus time on prediction markets; use DeFi for reliable yield, not lottery tickets; only buy altcoins with genuine user bases; and avoid GameFi, random NFTs, and new memecoins. The "TradFi is eating crypto" story misses the growing sectors. The easy money era is over, leaving a niche, selective market that requires real understanding, but opportunities remain for those who adapt.

marsbit7m ago

Wall Street Takes Over Bitcoin and Stablecoins, But Where Are the Real Profit Opportunities for Retail Investors?

marsbit7m ago

A Trillion-Dollar Frenzy for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

Summary: A stark divide has emerged in the tech industry. While memory chipmaker Micron's stock soared 19% in a single day, pushing its market cap over $1 trillion, smartphone manufacturer Xiaomi reported a 43% plunge in adjusted net profit. The core driver is a severe supply crunch in memory chips, particularly for AI applications. Wall Street analysts, led by UBS and its unprecedented 204% target price hike for Micron, argue that long-term agreements (LTAs) from AI cloud giants are fundamentally ending the sector's notorious boom-and-bust cycles, justifying a re-rating from cyclical to infrastructure-like valuations. However, the "storage" market is now fragmented into three tiers. The first, AI-grade memory like HBM and server DDR5, faces extreme shortages and soaring prices driven by massive cloud capex. The second, mobile memory for smartphones, is also seeing sharp price hikes as manufacturers like Xiaomi are forced to pay more for remaining capacity, severely squeezing their margins. The third, PC retail channels, shows price declines due to existing inventory. The article questions the sustainability of the "supercycle" narrative. It highlights that Micron's revenue surge is driven almost entirely by price increases, not shipment volumes, making it vulnerable to a potential demand slowdown. While LTAs may dampen volatility, history suggests they are often tested during downturns. The current peak earnings, used to justify high valuations, represent a classic cyclical top. The piece concludes with a note of caution: when the entire Street chants "this time is different," it's wise to remember past bubbles, even as it acknowledges AI demand may indeed be structural.

marsbit1h ago

A Trillion-Dollar Frenzy for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

marsbit1h ago

This New Generation of US Stock Trading Gods No Longer Read Financial Reports

The new generation of "stock gods" in the 2026 US AI bull market are not analyzing traditional financial reports. Instead of focusing on giants like NVIDIA, figures like the 22-year-old Leopold Aschenbrenner (who reportedly turned $200M into $14B) and influencers like Serenity on platforms like Reddit's WallStreetBets, X, and Substack are gaining fame and returns by targeting obscure, low-cap "micro-cap" stocks. Their strategy, dubbed "supply chain sniping," involves identifying critical, often monopolistic, bottlenecks in the AI hardware supply chain—such as specific materials or components essential for giants like Google and NVIDIA—that are missed by mainstream Wall Street analysts. Serenity's call on AXTI, a $700M company supplying indium phosphide substrates crucial for photonics and optical interconnects, saw the stock soar from ~$12 to nearly $150. Similarly, accounts like KawzInvests and PhotonCap focus on thematic, supply-chain-driven research in areas like AI infrastructure, optics, and cloud services for SMEs, bypassing traditional valuation metrics. This shift represents a cultural move away from Warren Buffett-style value investing based on deep financial statement analysis. The new approach thrives on low liquidity, early narratives, and strong community propagation on social media, similar to meme stocks or crypto. However, this "attention economy" strategy carries risks: it depends on sustained information gaps, the underlying companies' ability to deliver fundamental results, and the potential for crowded, volatile exits as narratives shift. The trend also shows crypto traders applying their narrative-sensing skills to US micro-caps, marking a significant evolution in trading culture.

marsbit1h ago

This New Generation of US Stock Trading Gods No Longer Read Financial Reports

marsbit1h ago

Trillion-Dollar Euphoria for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

Title: The Trillion-Dollar Memory Seller's Carnival vs. The Buyer's Halved Profits On May 26, a stark contrast unfolded. While memory chipmaker Micron's market cap surged past $1 trillion, smartphone maker Xiaomi reported plummeting profits. Xiaomi's Q1 2026 profits fell 43% year-on-year. Executive Lu Weibing cited memory prices quadrupling from last year, adding roughly $210 to a phone's cost. To survive, Xiaomi is cutting entry-level models, sacrificing volume. Micron's stock, however, skyrocketed over 19% in a day, capping an 8x gain in a year. Major banks like UBS and JPMorgan issued bullish reports, raising price targets drastically. Their core thesis: Long-Term Agreements (LTAs) with AI cloud giants (Microsoft, Google, etc.) are eliminating the memory industry's notorious boom-bust cycle. By locking in fixed-price, multi-year contracts for AI-grade memory (HBM, server DDR5), these deals promise stable, utility-like earnings, justifying a higher valuation (20-30x P/E vs. the historical 8-15x). The article reveals a three-tiered memory market in 2026: 1) **AI Storage (HBM/DDR5/Enterprise SSD)**: Extreme shortage, soaring prices, LTAs. This is Micron's story. 2) **Mobile/Embedded Memory**: Also facing sharp price hikes as AI production crowds out capacity, severely pressuring phone makers like Xiaomi. 3) **PC Retail**: Some spot prices are falling due to channel inventory liquidation, creating a divergence from contract markets. The author questions if LTAs truly end the cycle. It hinges on sustained, hyper-growth AI demand. Micron's current profits are at a cycle peak, driven mostly by price hikes, not volume. If AI capital expenditure growth slows, the massive industry capacity expansion (e.g., Micron's $250B+ CapEx plan) could lead to a glut. Historically, using peak-cycle earnings for valuation is a classic trap. While the AI-driven structural shift might be real, the unanimous Wall Street euphoria warrants caution, echoing past bubbles like Cisco's in 2000. The memory seller's trillion-dollar狂欢 (carnival) continues, but the cycle's shadow remains.

链捕手1h ago

Trillion-Dollar Euphoria for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片