MIT Graduates Seek to Exclude Google History in $25M Crypto Lawsuit

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-08-26Last updated on 2025-08-26

Two MIT-educated brothers, Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, accused of allegedly stealing $25 million in cryptocurrency through a blockchain exploit in 2023, are fighting to keep their Google search history out of court. The duo claimed that federal prosecutors have intentions to unfairly use searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” to prove criminal intent.

The brothers filed the motion on Friday in Manhattan’s federal court, saying that their search history has no evidentiary weight without proper context. 

U.S. District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will decide whether searches conducted after the alleged crime can demonstrate consciousness of guilt or simply reflect prudent legal consultation during the investigation. 

Prosecutors Allow Search History as Proof

According to federal prosecutors, the searches show the defendants’ consciousness of guilt. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation. 

Prosecutors alleged that the brothers used their specialized skills and education to exploit Ethereum’s MEV-boost system in April 2023, fraudulently intercepting private transactions and diverting $25 million in just 12 seconds. If convicted, the brothers can face up to 20 years of imprisonment. 

“The Superseding Indictment (“Indictment”) highlights various Google searches allegedly performed during the time after the alleged Exploit when the Peraire-Buenos were being advised by counsel……..The Indictment alleges, for example, that Anton Peraire-Bueno searched for “top crypto lawyers,” “how long is us statue of limitations,” “wire fraud statute/wire fraud statute of limitations,” and “money laundering statute of limitations,” the filing stated. 

Potential Dismissal of the Case

Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said, “Unfortunately for the defendants, their alleged crimes were no match for Department of Justice prosecutors and IRS agents, who unraveled this first-of-its-kind wire fraud and money laundering scheme.”

The Peraire-Bueno brothers also asked to exclude several other pieces of evidence, including a screenshot taken from X, showing fake signatures. They also asked the court to block prosecutors from introducing news articles that contain inflammatory descriptions of them. 

Also Read: Retired Australian Cop Loses $1.2M in a Crypto Scam in Thailand



Related Reads

Why is the STRC Preferred Stock Unlikely to Return to $100?

## Summary **Title: Why is STRC Preferred Stock Struggling to Return to $100?** The article analyzes the challenges facing STRC preferred stock in returning to its designed $100 price level. The original mechanisms to support the $100 price included an adjustable dividend yield, Strategy's right to buy back shares at $101, and a $100 per share liquidation claim in case of bankruptcy. However, these mechanisms are currently failing to function effectively. **Key Points:** * **Dividend Adjustments are Ineffective:** Increasing the dividend rate to attract investors is unlikely to work. It would place a greater financial burden on the issuer, Strategy, and high dividends in a difficult environment can be perceived negatively. Dividend payments are not guaranteed and depend on board discretion, creating significant uncertainty for investors. * **The $100 Claim is Largely Theoretical:** The $100 per share claim in bankruptcy is a key theoretical support, but its practical value is questionable. STRC, as preferred stock, has no maturity date, so investors can only recover principal if Strategy initiates a buyback or goes bankrupt. Strategy's current low leverage (11%) makes bankruptcy highly unlikely unless Bitcoin's price collapses to extreme lows (~$6,600). Even in a bankruptcy scenario, preferred stockholders' claims are subordinate to bondholders, making full recovery of the $100 unlikely. * **No Fundamental Reason for a $100 Price:** Given the weak dividend guarantee and the limited practical value of the bankruptcy claim, there is no fundamental reason for STRC to trade near $100. Its market price is instead determined by investor assessment of its risks. * **Current Market Pricing Reflects Risk:** Trading around $75, STRC offers an effective dividend yield of 15.3%, implying the market is demanding a risk premium of roughly 3.8% over the stated 11.5% rate due to the perceived uncertainties. The article suggests the price could fall further if investors demand an even higher yield (e.g., to $57.5 for a 20% yield). **Conclusion:** The core mechanisms designed to support STRC's $100 price are not functioning. The dividend is uncertain, and the bankruptcy claim offers little real protection. Therefore, STRC's price is converging to a market-determined level that reflects these significant risks, with no inherent driver to push it back to $100.

Foresight News1h ago

Why is the STRC Preferred Stock Unlikely to Return to $100?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片