全面解读:10 个热门 Launchpad 平台机制与散户必备指南

比推Published on 2025-08-25Last updated on 2025-08-25

作者:Biteye 核心贡献者 Viee

编辑:Biteye 核心贡献者 Denise

原文标题:解读10大Launchpad平台机制解析与散户生存指南


从Meme到AI Agent,Launchpad与传统股权挂钩的探索也在展开。

我们挑了10个代表性平台,拆解它们的特色机制,并聊聊散户该怎么玩,才能抓机会又避坑。

01、无许可平台

1.Heaven

机制:Heaven是新崛起的AMM+Launchpad平台,发行和交易一体化,项目无需迁移到外部DEX。所有交易手续费都留在平台,用于回购并销毁 $LIGHT,持有者可直接分享红利。相比之下,Pump.fun 虽然赚钱,但缺少这种回馈机制。

收益表现: $LIGHT 上线后一周连涨,市值突破1亿美元,持续的回购销毁机制大大增强了市场信心。

2.Zora

机制:Zora是Base链上的社交+创作者经济协议,核心玩法是发内容=发项目。你发一条文字或图片,它就会自动发射资产。

收益表现: $ZORA 曾连续20天拉了10倍,而今年4月,Coinbase Base链官方号发了句“Base is for everyone”,被自动铸造资产,很多人以为是官方,结果一拥而上,把市值炒到1700万美元,最后又快速回落90%。

3.Believe

机制:Believe前身是 Clout,最早玩“名人圈子”,后来转向社交资产化,带火了ICM叙事。用户只需在推特发一条带 @launchcoin 的推文,就能自动生成项目。市值超 10 万美元后,还会自动上线Meteora等交易平台。

收益表现:$LAUNCHCOIN 曾3天暴涨50倍,市值冲到3亿美元。更名前的$PASTERNAK一度接近归零,但更名后24小时又从100万拉到 2200 万。平台项目里不少也给过散户十倍以上机会。

4.Pump.fun

机制:Pump.fun 算是链上资产发行潮的开山鼻祖,直接把Meme玩法做爆了。上传名字、Logo、简介等,就能自动生成合约和初始流动性池。价格用的是联合曲线模型,买的人越多,价格越高。当市值达到指定阈值,智能合约也会把流动性自动迁到外部DEX,无缝接入更大市场。

收益表现:作为头号无许可平台,Pump.fun上诞生的知名Meme项目不胜枚举,就不多赘述了。

5.Bonk.fun

机制:BONK社区在 2025 年 4 月推出的平台,玩法类似 Pump.fun,但更强调社区分红。交易费用会部分回馈给 BONK 持有者和生态建设者,强化社区激励。

收益表现:网红猫 $HOSICO(最高市值 6000 万美金,涨幅 6 倍)、$USELESS(最高市值近 3 亿美金,涨幅超 10 倍)。整体来看,有社区支撑的项目更容易冲出重围。

6.Virtuals

机制:Virtuals专注AI Agent赛道,用户需锁定$VIRTUAL来创建Agent并建池,达到联合曲线阈值后就能“毕业”,生成与$VIRTUAL配对的流动性池。

收益表现:年初热度退去后,Genesis Launch再次点燃市场,$VIRTUAL 一周反弹150%,生态跟涨。新项目$BasisOS上线12天市值冲到550万美元,最高涨幅达40倍。

02、需要许可平台

和“无门槛”不同,这类Launchpad会严格筛选,走的是质量优先路线。

1.Echo

机制:Echo可以理解成“链上版天使投资联盟”。玩法是由一个领投人发起投资群,把自己拿到的项目机会分享给群组,大家一起跟投,最后领投人抽取一定分红。Echo 要求用户通过邮箱、推特账号等 KYC 验证,整体更偏小圈子。

收益表现:Echo已经撮合过一些热门项目的融资,比如Ethena、Morph、Usual、Hyperlane等,私募完成后项目发展也比较稳健。

2.Buidlpad

机制:Buidlpad是前币安高管 Erick Zhang 在 2024 年底推出的公募平台。和 Echo 的小圈子私募不同,Buidlpad严格要求 KYC,但更面向大众,今年 1 月还上线了第一个项目——Solayer的LAYER 公募。

收益表现:Solayer超募5倍,TGE当天涨幅达240%;Sahara超募8倍,TGE 当天也涨了120%。接下来 @Lombard_Finance 也将在Buidlpad开启社区轮预售。

3.Kaito

机制:7月,Kaito团队宣布要上线Capital Launchpad,类似Echo的链上天使投资平台,但分配方式不是拼手速,而是看链上持仓、社交声誉等指标。

收益表现:第一个项目Espresso,估值4 个亿。第二个项目Theoriq,估值7500万。

4.Ventuals

机制:Ventuals让普通用户也能玩Pre-IPO,只不过发的不是实股,而是追踪公司估值的永续合成资产。它基于Hyperliquid的HIP-3标准,把未上市公司股权做成链上衍生品,像“影子股票”一样交易。相比之下,PreStocks 和 Jarsy 属于真实股票1:1挂钩,对应实股,更贴近传统证券模式。

收益表现:截至8月20日,Ventuals项目24小时涨幅在5%-30%不等。

03、Launchpad护城河:拼公平、拼门槛,还是拼生态?

从前面的案例可以看出,Launchpad 平台几乎都是“一代版本一代神”,离不开两点:创造差异化资产和把流量留在平台内。在此基础上,还有几个维度特别关键:

1、公平性:Heaven通过回购销毁让用户和平台利益绑定,反之若被机器人和内幕盘控制,散户体验会崩。

2、门槛:Echo邀请制形成小圈子壁垒,Believe借社交网络效应拉人,这些都难被复制。

3、项目资源:能持续吸引好项目的平台,会形成“强者恒强”。

4、模式创新:Heaven的一体化、Zora做内容、Believe的社交触发,都是先发优势。

04、散户攻略:如何把握Launchpad机会而不被埋?

1、先看偏好:喜欢博弈,可以玩无许可平台,小资金也有可能有不错收益;想稳健,就选有许可平台,项目质量更有保障。

2、控制仓位:别梭哈,高风险仓位最好别超总资金的 10%–20%。

3、跟市场节奏:Meme、AI、Heaven、Zora 都是轮动的热点,哪个平台突然爆火,往往就有短期机会。

⚠️风险提示:仅供参考,不作投资建议。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Related Reads

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

A disgruntled early Ethereum developer and token holder presents six core criticisms of the project's trajectory, contrasting it with Solana's rise. 1. **Premature Complacency**: The Ethereum Foundation shifted from a "building" to an "infrastructure" mindset too soon, adopting a passive, "retired chairman" posture before securing market dominance, reflected in ETH's ~65% decline against BTC post-Merge. 2. **Misguided Messaging**: The Merge was marketed primarily on ESG (99.95% energy reduction) rather than user benefits like speed or yield, appealing to internal ideals instead of market demands. 3. **Delayed Execution**: Proof-of-Stake, on the roadmap since 2015, took seven years to launch, ceding critical narrative and development windows. Competitors like Solana built entire ecosystems in that time. 4. **Poor Native Staking UX**: Years after the Merge, there is still no first-party, user-friendly staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's "sound money" narrative. 5. **Managed Decline**: The rollup-centric roadmap deliberately weakens the base layer's fee capture, outsourcing value and profitability to L2s like Arbitrum and Base, which issue their own tokens and fragment capital. 6. **Ideology Over Product**: Ethereum culture prioritizes philosophical purity ("credible neutrality," "public goods") over competitive product delivery that meets user demands (e.g., financialization), while Solana's ecosystem focuses on coordinated execution. The diagnosis is accumulated execution debt, not a coordination failure. Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana efficiently executed. The current market cap reflects these specific strategic failures, not abstract theory.

marsbit1h ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

marsbit1h ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

Six Grievances from an Ethereum Developer The author, an early investor and developer still building on Ethereum, expresses deep frustration with its trajectory and declining ETH/BTC price since the merge. The core argument is that Ethereum's current market position stems from concrete failures in execution and strategy, not abstract coordination problems. The first grievance targets a shift in the Ethereum Foundation's mentality from builders to "infrastructure," adopting a premature posture of a retired victor. Second, marketing the Merge around ESG (99.95% energy reduction) is seen as talking to its own conscience rather than the market, which prioritizes user experience and yield. Third, the seven-year delay in delivering Proof-of-Stake (PoS) ceded critical narrative and development time to competitors like Solana. Fourth, three years post-merge, there is still no user-friendly first-party staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's monetary narrative. Fifth, the rollup-centric roadmap has strategically surrendered base-layer fee capture to L2s, fragmenting value within the ecosystem while Solana demonstrates an integrated L1's value accrual. Finally, the author criticizes an institutional culture that prioritizes philosophical ideals (credible neutrality, pluralism) over competitive product delivery focused on what users actually want. The diagnosis is "accumulated execution debt." Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana's ecosystem coordinated efficiently to deliver and capture the next wave of value. The conclusion is that Ethereum's market cap reflects its abandonment of the fight for asset appreciation.

链捕手1h ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

链捕手1h ago

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbit2h ago

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片