Winklevoss-Owned Gemini Wins MiCA Approval for EU Expansion

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-08-03Last updated on 2025-08-21

Gemini, an American cryptocurrency exchange owned by the Winklevoss twins, has received a Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) license in Malta, granted by the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA).

The license will enable Gemini to provide its crypto services to more than 30 European nations, enabling the company to expand in the region. Gemini said it wants to provide “secure and reliable” crypto products to customers across Europe.

https://twitter.com/Gemini/status/1958513980596498488

MiCA is a new European Union regulation that sets rules for crypto companies operating in Europe. This license aims to make the crypto market safer, more transparent, and legally clear.

Gemini said that clear rules like MiCA are important for crypto adoption worldwide, and it praised Europe for being “forward-thinking” in regulation.

Gemini’s Crypto Expansion

Earlier in May, Gemini got a MiFID II license, which lets it offer derivatives trading in Europe. With that license, Gemini offers crypto derivatives across the entire European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA).

Just last week, Gemini also filed IPO to list its Class A shares on Nasdaq under the ticker GEMI, marking a big step toward becoming a public company.

In its IPO filing, Gemini revealed a net loss of $282.5 million in the first half of 2025, compared to $41.4 million last year. Revenue dropped slightly to $68.6 million. However, the number of active users rose to 523,000, while assets stayed at $18.2 billion.

Moreover, Gemini began offering tokenized stocks in June and began with MicroStrategy’s MSTR for European customers first. It allows investors to buy and sell MSTR 24/7, bringing the security of blockchain to traditional stocks. Gemini collaborated with Dinari Global for this launch.

Also Read: Ripple Provides $75M Credit Line to Gemini Ahead of IPO



Related Reads

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

The BIS report, "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins," highlights that the primary risks of stablecoins extend beyond potential de-pegging. It argues that the core challenge is whether stablecoins can be integrated into a financial system that is identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable. While acknowledging efficiency gains like faster payments and programmability, BIS emphasizes that money requires an institutional framework—including legal certainty, liquidity support, and financial integrity controls—which many stablecoins currently lack. The report details compliance risks, noting that while blockchain transactions are transparent, address visibility does not equate to identity or purpose clarity. This creates a systemic risk as pseudonymity, non-custodial wallets, and cross-chain bridges can undermine AML/CFT controls. Furthermore, these risks can spill over into the traditional financial system through on- and off-ramps. The future direction, per BIS, is not to prohibit innovation but to embed regulatory rules—such as identity verification and transaction screening—directly into the technological infrastructure of tokenized finance. The key takeaway for compliance is that any new financial instrument must clearly address questions of customer identification, transaction monitoring, accountability, and cross-border rule consistency to be viable as a mainstream payment tool.

marsbit1h ago

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

marsbit1h ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

When Silicon Valley Giants Turn to Chinese AI Models to Cut Costs A surprising trend is emerging: major U.S. tech companies are significantly reducing AI costs by switching to Chinese models. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, reportedly halved its AI spending after migrating to China's GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7 models, despite increasing usage. They achieved this through a sophisticated three-part strategy: implementing an automatic routing system to select the most cost-effective model per task, boosting cache hit rates from 5% to 60% to reuse computations, and employing "context engineering" to provide AI with more precise, less cluttered information. They are not alone. AI startup Lindy switched from Claude to DeepSeek, saving millions, while Snowflake's tests found GLM-5.2 solved 66% of coding tasks compared to Claude Opus's 67%—but at a fraction of the cost (output pricing is 5-7 times lower). While the top Western models may offer slightly better stability, the massive price differential is leading many businesses to reconsider their value proposition. This shift signals a deeper change in the AI industry, moving beyond pure performance benchmarks to a fierce cost competition. As pressure mounts, even OpenAI and Anthropic have begun slashing prices. For users, this means more choices, lower costs, and a crucial lesson: using multiple models based on task complexity, optimizing with caching, and keeping contexts lean are now key to leveraging AI efficiently and affordably.

marsbit1h ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片