Crypto community confused as Celsius continues with weekly rewards

CointelegraphPublished on 2022-06-28Last updated on 2022-06-28

Abstract

Members of the crypto community on Twitter have been left bewildered by the beleaguered Celsius Network continuing to pay weekly rewards despite pausing withdrawals two weeks ago.

Members of the crypto community on Twitter have been left bewildered by the beleaguered Celsius Network continuing to pay weekly rewards despite pausing withdrawals two weeks ago.
As previously reported, crypto lending platform Celsius paused withdrawals on June 13 after citing extreme market conditions amid the current bear market. Reports soon followed that the firm was undergoing liquidity issues and may be heading towards insolvency, potentially putting users’ funds at risk.

Figures such as Bitcoin (BTC) OG and CEO and co-founder of online investment platform BnkToTheFuture, Simon Dixon, tweeted his bewilderment to his 59,300 followers on June 27 over receiving nearly $4,000 worth of crypto rewards but being unable to withdraw them:
“Email on one of my accounts. Can’t withdraw but @CelsiusNetwork is still paying out. I’m curious if you think the rewards should still be coming? Thoughts?”
Upon searching “Celsius still paying” on Twitter, there are countless users raising questions over the lending platform, with some such as 'CryptoStylesUSA' calling it “insulting” that Celsius continues to pay weekly rewards while keeping their “crypto hostage.”

According to Celsius' website — which is currently undergoing revamp due to the liquidity issues — the company is still advertising annual percentage yields (APYs) of up to 18.63% on crypto deposits, which many have argued is unsustainable.
The SNX native token from decentralized finance (DeFi) platform Synthetix is the only asset this promotio offers at the time of writing. The top tier stablecoins have roughly a 9% APY listed, while Polkadot (DOT) and Polygon (MATIC) have offered APYs as high as 11.87% and 9.52% apiece.
Celsius also appears to be still offering 10% rewards on first deposits up to $250,000 despite not currently allowing users to withdraw from the platform.
While it is still uncertain what the exact fate of funds belonging to Celsius users will be, the firm reportedly onboarded advisers from a management consulting firm in advance of the company possibly facing bankruptcy. Celsius also hired lawyers on June 14 to help restructure the company amid its financial woes.
On June 27, rumors started circulating that Celsius CEO Alex Mashinksy allegedly attempted to leave the country via Morrison Airport in New Jersey but was stopped by authorities. It appears the story originated from crypto analyst Mike Alfred, however, the firm has reportedly denied the accusations.

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbit12m ago

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbit12m ago

What Kind of People Is Anthropic Actually Hiring? Insights from 1,680 Resumes Provide the Answer

Contrary to the common perception of Anthropic as a PhD-heavy AI research lab, an analysis of 1,680 engineer profiles reveals its core talent is experienced "builders." The engineering team, largely assembled in the past 18 months (median tenure 10 months), hires senior engineers with a median of 12.2 years of prior experience. They primarily come from major engineering-focused companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Stripe, Databricks, Snowflake, and Palantir, not primarily from other AI labs. Their backgrounds are infrastructure-heavy (40%), focusing on backend, distributed systems, databases, and security, with skills like Python, Java, C++, and AWS being common. Only 13.7% hold PhDs. The dominant job title is "Member of Technical Staff." For early-career hires (<6 years experience), entry is not based on standard work history but on prestigious signals: top internships (e.g., at FAANG or quant trading firms), competition rankings, research publications, or AI safety fellowship experience. The key insight for applicants is to present as infrastructure builders, highlighting experience with large-scale systems, not as pure researchers, reflecting Anthropic's identity as a highly engineered infrastructure company.

marsbit14m ago

What Kind of People Is Anthropic Actually Hiring? Insights from 1,680 Resumes Provide the Answer

marsbit14m ago

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbit19m ago

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbit19m ago

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

"Why 'AI Service Subscription Models' Are Doomed to Disappear" The article argues that the flat-rate subscription model for AI services is fundamentally unsustainable. It points to recent industry shifts, such as Anthropic limiting access to its flagship Claude Fable 5 model for subscribers after just 14 days, and GitHub and OpenAI moving towards credit-based or usage-based billing. The core problem is that subscription models rely on a capped human consumption limit—like watching videos or listening to music—which keeps costs predictable. However, the rise of autonomous AI agents shatters this premise. Agents can consume 5 to 30 times more computing resources (tokens) than a human chatting, and they operate continuously without user presence. This removes the natural usage cap, making fixed-price plans financially unviable as heavy users incur massive costs. Attempts to patch the model with higher tiers or usage caps have failed, often leading to "adverse selection" where only the heaviest users subscribe. The industry's solution is to hollow out subscriptions, replacing "unlimited" access with prepaid credits charged per token, akin to a utility meter. While chat-based subscriptions may linger, the real value and revenue are shifting to pay-as-you-go models. The current period represents a final, heavily subsidized phase for users. The conclusion is that the soul of subscription—a fixed price for worry-free use—is dying, soon to be replaced by pure usage-based pricing where everyone pays for their own "electricity meter."

marsbit20m ago

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

marsbit20m ago

The Biggest Buyer Disappears: The AI Capital Frenzy Is Reversing the 'De-Equitization' Cycle in US Stocks

"The AI capital surge is reversing a two-decade-long trend of 'de-equitization' in the U.S. stock market. According to JPMorgan, net equity supply could reach $1.5 trillion over the next two years, the strongest cycle since the late 1990s. Goldman Sachs forecasts net supply will rise from negative to around zero by 2026, ending a key structural support for stocks. This shift is driven by massive capital demands from the AI race, pushing companies from buybacks to large-scale equity issuance. Landmark events include SpaceX's record $75B IPO, with OpenAI and Anthropic poised to follow. Alphabet is planning an $85B share sale, emblematic of tech giants turning from net buyers to sellers. While retail investors and money market funds are seen as potential buyers, concerns are rising. Analysts warn that such concentrated, large-scale issuance historically coincides with investment frenzies and often precedes weaker market returns and increased volatility. The era of easy 'stock market QE' is over, with supply becoming a significant market headwind."

marsbit24m ago

The Biggest Buyer Disappears: The AI Capital Frenzy Is Reversing the 'De-Equitization' Cycle in US Stocks

marsbit24m ago

Trading

Spot

Futures