GENIUS Act: U.S. Treasury seeks public input on stablecoin monitoring tools

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-08-19Last updated on 2025-08-19

Key Takeaways 

U.S. Treasury’s public comment window on tracking stablecoin activity will end on the 17th of October. Meanwhile, the banking lobby wants to stop interest paid on payment stablecoins. 


The U.S. Treasury has opened a public comment window on tackling illicit activity involving stablecoins as stipulated in the GENIUS Act

According to the Treasury statement, the move would gauge the efficiency and cost of novel tools for monitoring such illicit activities. 

“Treasury will use public comments to inform research on the effectiveness, costs, privacy, and cybersecurity risks, and other considerations related to these tools.”

The public will be allowed to make relevant submissions by the 17th of October. It will set the stage for the implementation of the provisions under the stablecoin-focused GENIUS Act. 

Balancing safety and innovation

Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary, said implementation of the Act was crucial to ensure American ‘leadership in digital assets.’ He added, 

“It’s a win-win-win for everyone involved: stablecoin users, stablecoin issuers, and the U.S. Treasury Department.”

GENIUS Act U.S TreasuryGENIUS Act U.S Treasury

Source: X

Worth pointing out that stablecoin issuers will become key buyers of U.S. Treasury bills.

They will be used as part of the reserve backing for their issued digital dollars. In fact, Tether ranked the 18th largest buyer of T-bills in Q2, surpassing South Korea.

That said, after the October comment window, the Treasury will draft proposed rules under the GENIUS Act.

This would factor in the public input and include how firms should track stablecoin activity and the associated tools that balance costs and efficiency. 

Notably, the Act has a ‘lawful order’ provision that forces an issuer to seize, burn, freeze, or prevent stablecoin transfers based on a court or a regulator order. 

Overall, the draft and guidance by Treasury and other regulators could stretch to early 2026.

According to Latham and Williams LLP, the GENIUS Act will take effect 18 months after enactment or 120 days after regulators issue final guidances implementing the Act.  

As such, final rules could likely be issued by mid-2026, and enforcement for those flouting the compliance could begin from 2027. 

Meanwhile, the banking lobby, via the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), recently urged Congress to seal GENIUS Act ‘loopholes’ that allow payment of interest for stablecoins.

The lobby claimed that the loophole could trigger a capital flight worth over $6.6 trillion and dent banks’ lending capacity. 

“Incentivizing a shift from bank deposits and money market funds to stablecoins would end up increasing lending costs and reducing loans to businesses and consumer households.”

It remains to be seen whether any strict rules against yield on payment stablecoins will be issued by regulators. 

Share

Related Reads

Opinion: AI Bubble Bursts, Bitcoin and Other Risky Assets Are the First to Be Impacted

BIS Warns AI Investment Boom Could Trigger Market Stress, Impacting Bitcoin First The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) warns that a potential bursting of the "AI bubble" could tighten liquidity and severely impact risk assets like Bitcoin in the near term. Major tech firms are projected to spend over $1 trillion on AI infrastructure in 2025-2026. The BIS cautions that if returns fail to meet expectations, a sudden withdrawal of financing could turn this investment boom into a prolonged bust, creating ripple effects across financial markets. While AI holds long-term economic promise, the current scale and speed of investment, coupled with intense competition and physical bottlenecks (e.g., semiconductors, power grids), mirror historical bubbles. The report highlights that the AI funding web—spanning corporate debt, private credit, and complex vendor agreements—makes systemic risks harder to see. A disappointment in AI adoption could transmit stress through this chain, widening credit spreads and pressuring weaker borrowers. For Bitcoin, the initial reaction to such a market shock would likely be defensive. As liquidity tightens, investors typically sell liquid assets first, and Bitcoin often trades in line with other risk assets during portfolio de-risking. Recent correlations, like Bitcoin's drop following a sharp decline in South Korea's stock market, support this view. However, the longer-term outcome for Bitcoin depends on the policy response. If an AI-driven credit crunch forces central banks to inject liquidity and ease policy eventually, it could reignite Bitcoin's narrative as a hedge against monetary debasement. Yet, traders betting on this outcome may first have to endure significant market volatility and potential price declines.

marsbit40m ago

Opinion: AI Bubble Bursts, Bitcoin and Other Risky Assets Are the First to Be Impacted

marsbit40m ago

South Korea Reaps Riches, America Turns Hostile

The US has filed a collective antitrust lawsuit in California against Samsung, SK Hynix, and US-based Micron, alleging they colluded to create a "RAMpocalypse" by slashing traditional DRAM production and raising prices 700% over four years amid the AI boom. This lawsuit targets the heart of the AI supply chain: High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), critical for Nvidia's GPUs. Currently, SK Hynix (57%), Samsung (22%), and Micron (21%) dominate global HBM production. The case highlights a deeper US concern: in the AI era, South Korea, through its HBM dominance, is capturing an estimated 35% of global AI profits, second only to the US (49%). SK Hynix's operating profit margin recently hit a record 72%. In response to the lawsuit, South Korea announced a massive $800 trillion won investment to build four new chip plants, doubling down on its strategic position. Analysts see the lawsuit not merely as a consumer price issue but as strategic pressure. It aims to support Micron's US manufacturing expansion (subsidized by the CHIPS Act) and secure America's share of AI profits by bringing more HBM production onshore. However, South Korea's rapid execution and massive cash flow from current HBM sales give it a significant speed advantage over US build-out timelines. The conflict underscores a fundamental shift: AI infrastructure like GPUs and HBM is becoming a new form of strategic national resource, akin to oil. While Nvidia and Korean memory giants are interdependent, the struggle over profit distribution and industrial sovereignty in this new landscape is just beginning. This lawsuit may be the first major skirmish in the AI resource wars.

marsbit53m ago

South Korea Reaps Riches, America Turns Hostile

marsbit53m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片