本周前瞻:静待“恐怖星期四”,鲍威尔杰克逊霍尔年会“亮剑”在即

marsbitPublished on 2025-08-17Last updated on 2025-08-18

上周,市场在多空信息的交织中窄幅震荡,投资者情绪普遍趋于谨慎。一方面,部分经济数据显示出经济韧性,但另一方面,市场对于高利率环境下企业盈利前景的担忧依然存在。在缺乏明确指引的情况下,全球市场的目光,已然全部聚焦于本周即将到来的“超级星期四”和“压轴星期五”——美联-储将密集释放关键政策信号。

从会议纪要的“提前剧透”,到联储主席的“一锤定音”,本周市场的主旋律无疑是“倾听美联-储”。杰克逊霍尔全球央行年会的召开,将为全球央行官员提供一个定调未来数月货币政策的绝佳舞台。


核心看点一:周四凌晨的“美联储时间”——会议纪要与官员讲话

  • 北京时间周四凌晨 2:00:美联储公布货币政策会议纪要
  • 北京时间周四凌晨 3:00:2027年FOMC票委、亚特兰大联储主席博斯蒂克发表讲话

在鲍威尔周五的重磅讲话之前,周四凌晨的会议纪要将为市场提供第一次深入洞察美联储内部政策倾向的机会。这份纪要将详细揭示上一次FOMC会议上,各位委员对于当前经济形势、通胀路径以及未来政策利率走势的讨论细节。

市场将重点关注以下几点:

  1. 内部分歧程度: 委员们对于“何时适合调整利率”的看法是否存在巨大分歧?是鹰派声音占主导,还是鸽派的担忧正在增加?
  2. 对经济的评估: 美联-储如何看待当前依然强劲的就业市场和具有粘性的服务业通胀?他们是更担心通胀的二次抬头,还是更忧虑经济的“硬着陆”风险?
  3. 关键词搜索: 市场将仔细研读纪要中的措辞,寻找诸如“足够限制性”(sufficiently restrictive)、“对前景保持耐心”(patient on the outlook)等关键表述,以判断政策的微妙转变。

紧随其后的亚特兰大联储主席博斯蒂克的讲话,则为市场提供了来自决策者的新鲜观点。作为未来的票委,他的发言将反映出美联-储官员在获取最新数据后,对经济前景的实时看法,可以被视为纪要内容的一种“更新和补充”。如果他的观点与纪要透露的基调一致,将强化市场的预期;反之,则可能引发市场的困惑和短期波动。


核心看点二:周五晚间的“压轴大戏”——鲍威尔年会讲话

  • 北京时间周五晚 22:00:美联储主席鲍威尔在杰克逊霍尔全球央行年会发表讲话

这无疑是本周全球市场最为瞩目的焦点。历史上,多位美联储主席都曾利用这一场合,向市场释放关于货币政策重大转向的信号。在全球通胀回落但根基不稳、经济增长前景不明的十字路口,鲍威尔的每一次公开表态都可能引发市场的“惊涛骇浪”。

市场三大猜想:

  1. 鹰派立场:重申抗通胀决心。 鲍威尔可能强调,尽管通胀已取得进展,但“最后一公里”的斗争仍很艰难,现在讨论降息为时过早,甚至不排除在必要时进一步收紧政策的可能性。若如此,将对风险资产构成打击,美元和美债收益率可能走高。
  2. 鸽派转向:暗示政策拐点。 如果鲍威尔更多地承认经济面临的下行风险,并对通胀回落的趋势表示出更强的信心,暗示政策利率已达到峰值,并为未来的降息打开大门。这将极大地提振市场情绪,美股有望上涨,美元则可能承压。
  3. 中性平衡:强调数据依赖。 这是最有可能出现的情况。鲍威尔或将维持“见招拆招”的策略,强调未来的每一步决策都将依赖于后续的经济数据,避免给出任何明确的前瞻性指引。这种表态虽然“四平八稳”,但可能会因为缺乏新意而让市场感到失望,导致波动加剧。


其他值得关注的数据

  • 北京时间周四晚 20:30:美国当周初请失业金人数

作为反映劳动力市场健康状况的高频数据,初请失业金人数是观察经济动向的重要窗口。若该数据意外大幅上升,将表明就业市场开始降温,可能增强市场对美联-储鸽派转向的预期。反之,若数据持续处于低位,则说明就业市场依然火热,将支持美联-储在更长时间内维持高利率。这份数据在鲍威尔讲话前夜公布,将为市场提供最后的关键参考。


本周总结与展望

总而言之,本周是名副其实的“美联储周”。市场在周四凌晨前可能维持观望态势,真正的行情波动将从周四开始集中爆发。会议纪要、官员讲话和鲍威尔的最终定调,三者之间是否会传递出一致的信号,是决定本周乃至未来一个月市场走向的关键。

投资者需为可能到来的市场高波动性做好准备,密切关注上述事件的每一个细节。鲍威尔的讲话是会像雄鹰一样划破长空,还是会像鸽子一样带来橄榄枝,答案即将在本周五晚间揭晓。

Related Reads

How the CLARITY Act Reshapes the Stablecoin Yield Economy

The CLARITY Act, recently advanced by the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, fundamentally reshapes the stablecoin yield economy by closing loopholes left by the earlier GENIUS Act. Its Section 404 expands the ban on "hold-to-earn" rewards to all Digital Asset Service Providers (DASPs) and their affiliates, prohibiting any passive, interest-like yield. Crucially, it introduces a legal distinction, permitting "use-to-earn" rewards based on actual activities like spending, trading, or staking. In anticipation of this regulatory shift, major Wall Street asset managers—Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, and JPMorgan—have launched a series of tokenized money market funds (e.g., BlackRock's BRSRV, JPMorgan's JLTXX) designed explicitly for stablecoin reserve assets. These products represent a new, compliant yield layer: the stablecoin issuer earns interest from the underlying tokenized fund, which can then be passed to users through redesigned activity-based rewards. This marks a paradigm shift from a "hold-to-earn" to a "use-to-earn" market. While pathways remain for exchanges to redesign rewards (Path A) and for DeFi protocols to offer yield (Path B), the tokenized reserve asset layer (Path C) emerges as the most robust and strategically positioned infrastructure. However, this concentration—exemplified by BlackRock's BUIDL fund backing over 90% of USDtb's reserves—introduces new systemic risks. The final outcome hinges on regulatory decisions, particularly the OCC's proposed 20% cap on tokenized assets in reserves, which will determine the scalability of this new financial infrastructure layer.

marsbit1h ago

How the CLARITY Act Reshapes the Stablecoin Yield Economy

marsbit1h ago

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took two landmark actions on May 29. It approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual futures contract and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets. This allows Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a subsidiary, with digital assets permitted as collateral. These moves, coupled with a new CFTC policy statement, provide a clearer regulatory pathway for perpetual contracts in the U.S., moving them from a regulatory gray area. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated this is a key step for U.S. crypto leadership but noted the policy is not yet permanent. The article explains that CFTC's previous reluctance stemmed from legal ambiguities, as perpetual contracts lack an expiration date. However, such contracts dominate global crypto derivatives, accounting for ~78% of centralized exchange volume in 2025, forcing U.S. regulators to adapt to competition from offshore platforms like Hyperliquid. The approvals offer two compliance paths: Kalshi's direct listing and Coinbase's model using foreign futures. This is expected to attract institutional capital back to regulated U.S. venues, stimulate the launch of more products like ETH perpetuals, and enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives market. The author suggests this may signal a "regulatorily friendly" era for crypto.

marsbit4h ago

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

marsbit4h ago

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

This article presents a perspective from Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink and a former BlackRock executive. He argues that current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and ETH's price miss the bigger picture for institutional adoption. Chalom asserts that Ethereum is decisively winning in the three key attributes institutions value most: trust, security, and liquidity. He cites its dominance in stablecoin settlement, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and high-value DeFi as evidence. This success is attributed to the EF's consistent, long-term protocol development over a decade, including major upgrades like The Merge and a robust future roadmap. He defends Ethereum's decentralization as a core strength, not a weakness, stating institutions require a neutral infrastructure not controlled by any single entity. Comparing ETH to Amazon, Chalom suggests critics focusing on short-term price are missing its potential to become the foundational settlement layer for the entire global financial system. The article encourages a contrarian "be greedy when others are fearful" investment approach, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy and BlackRock's continued investment during crypto winters. Chalom concludes that while the EF correctly focuses on core protocol attributes (CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), a leadership gap exists in market-facing narrative and institutional adoption. He calls for ecosystem participants, including his own firm Sharplink, to become more vocal advocates to support Ethereum's impending "supercycle" of institutional adoption.

链捕手5h ago

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

链捕手5h ago

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

"Serenity's Bottleneck Investment Methodology: A Deep Dive" This article dissects the "bottleneck point investment" strategy of the pseudonymous investor Serenity, known for exceptional returns (YTD 4502.45%). The core methodology involves identifying a major technological trend (e.g., AI compute expansion), mapping its supply chain, and investing early in the most irreplaceable, supply-constrained upstream component before the market fully values it. The framework is broken down into a five-factor model: 1. **Deterministic Demand**: Anchored in a large, validated trend. 2. **Constrained Supply**: The component must be difficult to replicate or scale quickly. 3. **Low Market Attention**: Opportunities exist where coverage is sparse. 4. **Value Capture**: The company must have pricing power, high margins, and customer lock-in. 5. **Catalyst**: A near-term event to trigger price discovery (earnings, customer ramp, etc.). The article provides illustrative examples like $AXTI (InP substrates for photonics), $RPI (edge hardware for AI agents), and $AAOI/$LITE (components for cloud ASICs). To apply this method, a six-step process is outlined: identify the macro trend, map the supply chain, pinpoint the true bottleneck, gather evidence (client wins, certifications), assess risks ("anti-thesis table"), and size the position according to research depth. Crucially, the article notes significant limitations: risk of overfitting inferences from sparse data, valuation challenges for pre-revenue companies, liquidity/reflexivity risks due to Serenity's own market influence, and survivor bias amplified by a strong AI bull market. The key takeaway is to emulate the rigorous research process—finding the trend, the bottleneck, the evidence—rather than blindly copying specific stock picks, emphasizing the discipline of "walking through the narrow gate."

marsbit5h ago

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片