加密行业 7 月高管变动潮：30 位关键人物履新，传统金融专家密集加盟

深潮Published on 2025-08-04Last updated on 2025-08-05

职务变动涵盖 DeFi、稳定币、链上基础设施和 RWA 平台等领域，其中围绕稳定币和代币化资产出现招聘热潮。

撰文：Tim Copeland，The Block

编译：Felix, PANews

7 月招聘势头保持稳定，加密货币公司继续从传统金融和更广泛的科技领域招揽经验丰富的运营人员。多个团队在交易、营收、法务和增长等领域进行了战略性高管补充，反映出其推动运营正规化并为更受监管的市场环境做好准备。招聘活动涵盖了 DeFi、稳定币、链上基础设施和 RWA 平台等领域。

围绕稳定币和代币化资产计划出现了明显的招聘热潮。Bastion 在构建其受纽约金融服务局监管的基础设施过程中，新聘了两名负责财务和营收职能的高级管理人员。随着金库和代币化产品在金融科技公司和资产管理公司中越来越受欢迎，Veda 和 Stellar Development Foundation 也聘请了新的高管来领导法务、增长和市场营销部门。Chainlink、NEAR 和 ReserveOne 也延续了这一趋势，新聘人员专注于生态系统拓展和机构定位。

在监管方面，本月的人员变动更为明显。美国证券交易委员会（SEC）要求美国上市公司会计监督委员会（PCAOB）主席 Erica Williams 辞职，同时任命了一位新的货币监理署署长。与此同时，一些知名的加密货币运营商转任顾问或离职另谋发展，这表明随着行业适应不断变化的合规要求、市场结构和资本需求，一场缓慢但持续的人员「洗牌」正在进行中。

新任

Bastion：Vince Tejada 加入担任财务和战略财务主管。他此前在瑞波公司工作，曾帮助领导全球支付和稳定币项目，包括参与推出 RLUSD。在其职业生涯早期，他曾就职于摩根大通和 IBM。

Bastion：Jared Klee 加入担任营收主管。他曾担任 Vouch 的销售主管，并在 Vouch 推出了公司的 Web3 业务。他曾与他人共同创立 Triple Point Liquidity，更早之前在 IBM 担任过多个职务，包括领导 IBM 区块链的数字资产业务。

Blockdaemon：Alex Zinder 加入担任首席产品官。他此前在 Reya Labs 担任首席产品官。

CEA Industries：David Namdar 加入担任首席执行官。他此前是 Galaxy Digital 的联合创始人。

Chainlink Labs：Jordan Calinoff 加入担任稳定币和 RWA 部门主管。他此前在 Horizen Labs 担任战略与营收副总裁。

Coinbase：以人才收购的方式收购了 Opyn，引入了首席执行官 Andrew Leone 和研究主管 Joe Clark。Opyn 团队因开创 DeFi 期权、发明 Power Perpetuals 以及推出 Squeeth 而闻名。这是 Coinbase 今年的第六笔收购。

Coinbase：Alex 加入 Coinbase，成为该公司首位「CT 领导者」。此前，他是币安的社交媒体和社区负责人，称自己在多个平台上为该公司增加了 2000 万粉丝。他将与 Coinbase 的高管团队密切合作，领导加密原生营销工作。

dYdX：Eddie Zhang 在 Pocket Protector 被收购后加入 dYdX 担任总裁，此前他曾担任 Pocket Protector 的首席执行官兼联合创始人。Kaiser Kinbote 也加入 dYdX，担任增长主管。此前他在 Pocket Protector 负责战略和增长工作。

以太坊基金会：David Wals 加入并担任企业负责人。此前，他曾担任 Alluvial 的生态系统负责人。

G-Knot：Wes Kaplan 加入并担任首席执行官。此前，他曾担任 Cointelegraph 的首席执行官。

GSR：Frank Chaparro 加入并担任内容和特别项目主管。他此前是 The Block 的特约编辑兼 The Scoop 节目主持人。

M0：Thomas Scott 加入并担任总法律顾问。此前，他曾担任 Tools for Humanity 的首席法律官。

M11 基金：Thomas Rep 加入并担任投资组合经理。此前，他曾担任荷兰一家加密货币平台的交易和业务发展主管。

Multicoin Capital：Brian Strugats 加入并担任首席交易员。他曾担任 FalconX 交易主管，并在 Glenhill Capital、XN、Balantrove 和 Fortress 担任过高级职务。

NEAR Protocol：George Xian Zeng 加入并担任首席增长官。他曾担任 dYdX 首席运营官。

Paxos：Linnea Perelli-Minetti 加入并担任全球美元网络负责人。她曾担任 TIDAL (Block) 的产品及艺术家主管。

ReserveOne：Sebastian Bea 加入并担任总裁兼投资主管。他曾担任 Coinbase Asset Management 总裁。

Robot Ventures：Anirudh Pai 加入并担任投资合伙人。他曾是 Dragonfly 的合伙人。

RWA Summit：Foster Wright 加入并担任首席执行官。他曾担任 CoinDesk 总裁。

SharpLink：Joseph Chalom 于 7 月 24 日起担任联合首席执行官。他此前在贝莱德（BlackRock）担任高级主管，曾领导数字金融项目，包括推出 iShares 以太坊信托（ETHA）。

Stellar 发展基金会：Jose Fernandez da Ponte 加入基金会担任总裁兼首席增长官。他此前在 PayPal 担任区块链、加密货币和数字资产部门主管。Jason Karsh 也加入并担任首席营销官。他此前在 Block 担任业务主管，并曾在 Blockchain.com 任职。

Veda：TuongVy Le 加入并担任总法律顾问。她在美国证券交易委员会、Anchorage Digital 和贝恩资本加密部门积累了丰富的法律和政策经验。随着 Veda 扩展其金库基础设施平台，她将领导 Veda 的法律、合规和政策工作。

晋升

PayPal：Frank Keller 的职责范围扩大，将领导区块链、加密货币和数字货币业务。

SharpLink：Rob Phythian 将从首席执行官转任总裁，并继续担任公司董事会成员。

Uniswap Labs：Mary-Catherine Lader 从总裁兼首席运营官转任顾问，同时为新的业务发展做准备。

退出

Variant：Derek Walkush 在公司任职三年后离开，转而担任一家投资组合公司的运营职务。

货币监理署：Jonathan Gould 被任命为货币监理署署长。他曾是 Jones Day 律师事务所的合伙人。

美国上市公司会计监督委员会（PCAOB）：应美国证券交易委员会（SEC）主席 Paul Atkins 的辞职要求，Erica Williams 将于 7 月 22 日卸任主席一职。

Related Reads

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbit19m ago

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbit19m ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit34m ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit34m ago

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

NVIDIA's investment strategy operates through a "three-track architecture," not just its NVentures venture arm. Corporate Development handles massive strategic bets (e.g., $30B in OpenAI, $10B in Anthropic, $20B in Synopsys). NVentures, a small team, focuses on early-stage, financial investments across sectors like quantum computing (Alice & Bob, PsiQuantum), AI infrastructure (OpenRouter, Tensormesh), and biotech. The NVIDIA Inception accelerator provides non-monetary support. This system allows NVIDIA to nurture startups and lock in strategic partners, creating a vast AI ecosystem. This aggressive capital deployment has drawn scrutiny. Critics like Michael Burry and EU regulators question potential "circular financing," where NVIDIA's equity investments in companies (e.g., CoreWeave, OpenAI) facilitate those companies' purchases of NVIDIA hardware, potentially inflating revenue. Supporters view it as a necessary "virtuous cycle" to secure supply and demand in a compute-scarce market. While NVentures' smaller deals appear like traditional VC, its role within the larger, controversial investment framework remains a point of debate.

marsbit1h ago

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

marsbit1h ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit1h ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit1h ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1h ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片