Revolut Posts Strongest Report Yet: $506M From Crypto, 15M New Users, and IPO Momentum Grows

ccn.comPublished on 2025-04-24Last updated on 2025-04-24

Key Takeaways

  • Revolut more than doubled pre-tax profits to £1 billion in 2024.
  • Its Wealth division, fueled by crypto trading, earned £506 million, up nearly four times year-on-year.
  • An IPO is widely expected by 2026, but no official date has been set.

Revolut posted its strongest financial results to date, with profits crossing the £1 billion mark for the first time. This was driven by a surge in crypto trading, steady user growth, and new banking licenses that mark a shift toward traditional finance.

Once known for zero-fee currency exchanges and slick UX, the London-based startup is now angling to become a full-service bank. And with 50 million customers worldwide, it may be closer to that goal than ever.

Crypto Trading Drives Revolut’s Strongest Year

Pre-tax profit hit £1 billion, more than double the £438 million reported in 2023. Revenues jumped to £3.1 billion from £1.8 billion, with crypto trading doing much of the heavy lifting.

Revolut’s Wealth division generated £506 million in 2024, nearly quadrupling its previous total. The company didn’t break down how much of that came specifically from crypto, but the asset class clearly played a major role.

The company also added nearly 15 million new customers last year, boosting income from card fees and interest on deposits.

Revolut CEO and co-founder Nik Storonsky described 2024 as a “landmark year,” citing the company’s newly secured UK banking license and $45 billion valuation.

“This performance earned us the status of Europe’s most valuable private technology company, reflecting the confidence of existing and new investors in our trajectory,” Storonsky said in the company’s annual report.

“But we’re just getting started. We’re making strong progress towards 100 million daily active customers across 100 countries, driven by growth in the UK, Europe, and our expansion markets,” he added.

Storonsky notes that this target will keep Revolut focused on “revolutionizing global financial access through innovative products and seamless user experiences.”

A Banking App That’s Still Not a Bank, for Most Users

Despite the banking license it secured in July 2024, Revolut still struggles to convince users to treat it as their primary financial hub.

While balances rose from £18 billion to £30 billion and its loan book now sits at £979 million, many users still treat Revolut as a secondary service.

Premium subscriptions brought in £423 million—up 74% year-on-year, and its business offering now accounts for 15% of total revenue.

IPO on the Horizon, But No Rush

Talk of a public listing has been circulating for years. While Revolut hasn’t named a date, expectations are centered on 2026.

UK CEO Francesca Carlesi recently told the Wall Street Journal that getting full banking status was a critical step toward an IPO.

Revolut’s rising valuation, now reportedly higher than Barclays and Société Générale, could push it to act sooner.

Still, leadership is likely to hold out for stronger market conditions. And while UK officials have lobbied for Revolut to list in London, insiders suggest a New York debut remains the preferred option.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Related Reads

Embodied Intelligence 'Gaokao' is Insanely Hard, Humans Score 100, Best Model Only 12.8

Embodied AI Faces a Daunting "Everest": New Benchmark Reveals Huge Gap Between Models and Humans A comprehensive new benchmark for robotic manipulation, RoboDojo, has been released, painting a stark picture of the current state of embodied AI. It serves as a unified evaluation platform covering both simulation and real-world robot tasks. The benchmark assesses five core capabilities: Generalization (adapting to new scenes/objects), Memory, Precision manipulation, Long-Horizon multi-step tasks, and Open semantic understanding. It includes 42 simulation tasks and 18 standardized real-world tasks across three dual-arm robot platforms. The results are sobering. In simulation, the best-performing generalist robot policy achieved an average success rate of only 8.80%. Performance in the real world was slightly higher but still low, with the top model succeeding 12.8% of the time on average. In stark contrast, human experts scored 76.03% in simulation and 100% in real-world tests. The benchmark highlights significant, uneven gaps in current models' abilities. While some excel in specific areas like visual recognition or simple actions, they struggle with reliability, especially in long-horizon tasks where errors accumulate and in open-ended semantic instructions. The low scores, particularly in real-world deployment with physical uncertainties like camera noise and contact dynamics, underscore that today's models are far from being robust, general-purpose operational robots. RoboDojo is more than just a ranking; it's an infrastructure designed for fair, reproducible comparison. Its companion system, XPolicyLab, standardizes the interface for different models to be evaluated. Maintained by an academic consortium without commercial ties, it aims to provide a community-wide "altitude meter" to track genuine progress toward reliable and generalizable robot manipulation.

marsbit2m ago

Embodied Intelligence 'Gaokao' is Insanely Hard, Humans Score 100, Best Model Only 12.8

marsbit2m ago

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

Lilian Weng, former OpenAI security VP and co-founder of Thinking Machines Lab, has published a new blog post titled "Harness Engineering for Self-Improvement," proposing a pragmatic path for AI self-evolution. She argues that Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) may practically begin at the "Harness" layer—the external runtime system governing how models use tools, manage context, and execute tasks—rather than directly from the model rewriting its own weights. The blog outlines a progression from optimizing prompts (Context Engineering) to designing workflows, and ultimately to Self-Improving Harness systems. These systems can identify their own weaknesses, propose targeted, verifiable modifications to the harness code, and validate improvements. Works like Self-Harness and Darwin Gödel Machine (DGM) demonstrate significant performance gains on benchmarks like SWE-bench through such automated harness evolution, rivaling handcrafted agents. DeepSeek researcher Tianyi Cui endorsed the view, noting harness-based self-evolution is as promising as model-based approaches. Weng emphasizes this is complementary to model training, with both reinforcing each other. However, key challenges remain: weak evaluators for subjective tasks, reward hacking, diversity collapse, managing long-term system health versus short-term success, and defining the human oversight role. The consensus is growing: the harness is a critical variable, as the same model can exhibit vastly different capabilities within different harness systems.

marsbit1h ago

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片