Customer stories: Token Terminal’s Data Partnership with Vertex

Token TerminalPublished on 2024-10-27Last updated on 2024-11-21

Executive summary

Vertex Protocol is one of the fastest growing derivative exchange projects on Sei, with deployments also on Arbitrum, Base, Blast, and Mantle. The project has raised an $8.5m seed round from crypto-native funds, and its core contributors are a team of seasoned traders and engineers spanning both TradFi and DeFi markets. Now, with ~$80m in net deposits, Vertex recognized the need for reliable, continuous, and data-driven stakeholder reporting.

To improve its existing onchain analytics and stakeholder reporting, Vertex turned to Token Terminal, a leading onchain data platform trusted by institutional partners like Bloomberg. Token Terminal's dedicated focus on data standardisation made it an ideal partner for Vertex. The decision to partner was further eased by the fact that Token Terminal already had a public track record of reporting standardised financial and usage metrics for other leading derivative exchange projects, such as GMX, dYdX, Holdstation, and more.

“By partnering with Token Terminal, we’re able to benchmark our performance against the competition in a fair and accurate way. Having a real-time dashboard on Token Terminal is not only a great tool for our team, but for all Vertex stakeholders.”

Darius Tabai, Founding Contributor to Vertex

Data Partnership

To ensure accurate and ongoing stakeholder reporting, Vertex entered into a Data Partnership with Token Terminal.

The Data Partnership consists of four different parts:

1. Smart contract registry

Since Vertex isn’t an appchain, but a set of smart contracts running on multiple chains, this first step did not require a node infrastructure setup. Instead, Token Terminal was able to rely on its existing node infrastructure.

To start, the Vertex and Token Terminal teams worked together to build a labelled registry of Vertex’s smart contracts across chains.

A complete smart contract registry is a prerequisite for the next step: the transformation of raw blockchain data into standardised financial and usage metrics.

2. Metric transformations

Leveraging the information in the smart contract registry, Token Terminal’s research team transformed the raw blockchain data from the smart contracts into standardised financial and usage metrics.

For a derivative exchange project project like Vertex, the standardised metrics include net deposits, notional trading volume, fees, revenue, daily active users, and more.

3. Discovery and reporting

After the metric transformations, Vertex was listed on the derivative exchanges market sector dashboard on Token Terminal, and also featured on the recently launched Discover page. As a result, users, developers, and investors can now refer to a single source when deciding which protocols to use, integrate with, and/or invest in.

For Vertex, the dashboards on Token Terminal streamline the reporting to existing and future stakeholders.

4. Data maintenance

Standardised onchain metrics require ongoing maintenance work, especially when the goal is completeness and accuracy.

The maintenance work has only grown in magnitude and importance over the last few years, as more DeFi projects have evolved from single to multichain apps, with often more than one business line.

A Data Partnership with Token Terminal means that Vertex can rely on Token Terminal to manage all future updates to its metrics, and instead direct all focus on growing its onchain business.

Future opportunities

In addition to standardised financial and usage metrics, Vertex and Token Terminal are excited to explore opportunities to create custom dashboards with more project-specific metrics. These dashboards would offer both LPs and traders deeper insight into the platform’s features and performance. Some examples include LP profitability, trading activity by trader profile, and more.

Through its partnership with Token Terminal, Vertex turns transparency into a competitive advantage and continues to build trust with its growing community.


The authors of this content, or members, affiliates, or stakeholders of Token Terminal may be participating or are invested in protocols or tokens mentioned herein. The foregoing statement acts as a disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and is not a recommendation to purchase or invest in any token or participate in any protocol. Token Terminal does not recommend any particular course of action in relation to any token or protocol. The content herein is meant purely for educational and informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as financial, investment, legal, tax or any other professional or other advice. None of the content and information herein is presented to induce or to attempt to induce any reader or other person to buy, sell or hold any token or participate in any protocol or enter into, or offer to enter into, any agreement for or with a view to buying or selling any token or participating in any protocol. Statements made herein (including statements of opinion, if any) are wholly generic and not tailored to take into account the personal needs and unique circumstances of any reader or any other person. Readers are strongly urged to exercise caution and have regard to their own personal needs and circumstances before making any decision to buy or sell any token or participate in any protocol. Observations and views expressed herein may be changed by Token Terminal at any time without notice. Token Terminal accepts no liability whatsoever for any losses or liabilities arising from the use of or reliance on any of this content.

Stay in the loop

Join our mailing list to get the latest insights!

Related Reads

Understanding the New Economic Model of Tokenization

Understanding the New Token Economics Model The commercialization of AI applications is evolving from selling software and subscriptions to selling token call capacity. Tokens, the fundamental unit of information processing for large language models (LLMs), have become the basis for API billing and consumption. With call volumes exploding, tokens themselves are now being traded—procured, routed, split, and resold—forming a new intermediary market. This layer connects upstream LLM providers with downstream developers and enterprises, acting as a global wholesale-to-retail liquidity network. The rise of this business is fueled by a massive surge in China's daily token call volume—growing over a thousandfold from 100 billion in early 2024 to over 140 trillion by March 2026—and significant improvements in domestic LLM capabilities, which are now competitive globally. The core value of token distribution platforms extends beyond simple arbitrage. Key functions include aggregating multiple models (like GPT, Claude, and domestic models such as Kimi and DeepSeek) under a unified API, lowering network and payment barriers, and providing enterprise services like model selection, prompt engineering, and system integration. Profit models are diversifying: (1) resale margins; (2) technical premiums from proprietary inference acceleration (e.g., reducing costs to 1/10 of the industry standard); and (3) enterprise value-added services. High-consumption scenarios like marketing, short-form video, gaming, and e-commerce are primary drivers. Investment opportunities are seen in both companies with strong model capabilities (e.g., Alibaba, Tencent, MiniMax) and those with high-consumption client scenarios (e.g., marketing agencies with overseas reach). However, risks are significant: low entry barriers leading to intense competition, capital requirements and bad debt risks from advance payments, and dependency on policy changes from upstream LLM providers who control API pricing and access.

marsbit40m ago

Understanding the New Economic Model of Tokenization

marsbit40m ago

Farewell to the Copper Era: Understanding the Logic of the AI Silicon Photonics Industry Chain and Key US Stock Players

**Summary: The Era of Silicon Photonics and Key AI Infrastructure Stocks** The article delves into the transition from copper-based interconnects to silicon photonics (SiPh) as a critical enabler for next-generation AI data centers. It explains that copper faces fundamental physical limits—the bandwidth wall, density wall, and power wall—at high data rates (1.6T+), making a material shift essential. Silicon photonics, which integrates components like lasers, modulators, and detectors onto a silicon chip, offers a solution by leveraging mature CMOS manufacturing for cost-effective, high-volume production. A key challenge is that silicon itself is not an efficient light source, making Indium Phosphide (InP) lasers a critical and supply-constrained component. A major industry catalyst was NVIDIA's 2025 GTC announcement, declaring optical interconnects a "standard" from its Rubin platform onward, followed by strategic investments to secure the supply chain. The industry is structured in four key layers: 1. **Foundries:** TSMC leads with its COUPE platform, while Tower Semiconductor (specialized SiPh foundry) and GlobalFoundries are major players. 2. **Core Component Suppliers:** Lumentum is highlighted as the sole volume manufacturer of the crucial 200G/lane EML laser, with orders locked by NVIDIA through 2027. 3. **Module & System Manufacturers:** Coherent holds significant market share, with Chinese manufacturers like InnoLight also noted for scale. 4. **System Integrators:** NVIDIA, Broadcom, and Marvell dominate this layer, setting standards and integrating technology. The article identifies core public investment targets: **NVIDIA (NVDA)** as the ecosystem driver; **Broadcom (AVGO)** and **Marvell (MRVL)** in networking/switching chips; **Lumentum (LITE)** and **Coherent (COHR)** for critical components; and foundries **TSMC (TSM)** and **Tower Semiconductor (TSEM)**. Private companies Lightmatter and Ayar Labs are noted as key IPO candidates. The silicon photonics shift is driving a re-rating of company valuations, moving them from traditional telecom/industrial metrics to premium AI infrastructure multiples. The industry features high barriers to entry (e.g., multi-year lead times for InP laser capacity, complex 3D integration/thermal management, and lengthy customer qualification cycles), suggesting a "winner-takes-most" dynamic. Risks include dependence on hyperscaler capex cycles, potential technology disruption among competing optical approaches (LPO, CPO, OCS, Optical I/O), and a timeline where widespread CPO deployment may not occur until ~2028, with LPO serving as a transitional technology. The conclusion advises that betting on the overall industry trend may be safer than betting on any single company.

marsbit1h ago

Farewell to the Copper Era: Understanding the Logic of the AI Silicon Photonics Industry Chain and Key US Stock Players

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片