Предвыборное падение биткоина отражает прошлые тенденции: последует ли за ним историческое послевыборное ралли?

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2024-06-06Last updated on 2024-11-06

Недавнее предвыборное падение биткоина соответствует прошлым тенденциям, предполагая потенциальный послевыборный рост, аналогичный тем, что наблюдались в 2016 и 2020 годах.

Сегодня биткоин упал примерно до $66 600, продолжив коррекцию, которая набрала обороты в воскресенье, когда криптовалюта ненадолго упала до $68 000 после достижения $73 000 всего за несколько дней до этого. После последнего падения биткоин стабилизировался около $68 600. Это все еще является снижением на 3,30% за последние семь дней.

Однако появился проблеск надежды. Исторические закономерности показывают, что биткоин имеет тенденцию испытывать волатильность перед выборами в США, за которой часто следует послевыборный рост.

Скотти Пиппен, известный сторонник биткоина и бывший чемпион НБА, заметил, что биткоин имеет тенденцию снижаться перед выборами, но обычно растет после них. Он поделился анализом прошлых избирательных циклов, который это подтверждает. В нем подчеркивается, как биткоин пережил значительные восстановления в 2016 и 2020 годах после первоначальных падений в периоды выборов.

Тенденции Bitcoin до и после выборов

В 2016 году цена Bitcoin упала на 10,2% перед выборами, но затем резко выросла, поднявшись с $660 до более чем $1110 в последующие месяцы.

Аналогичным образом, в 2020 году за предвыборным падением на 6,1% последовал всплеск после выборов. Цена Bitcoin выросла с $13 000 до почти $40 000 в месяцы после выборов.

Эти прошлые тенденции подогревали ожидания потенциального ралли после выборов в 2024 году, особенно с учетом того, что Bitcoin уже пережил падение на 6,3% в преддверии выборов этого года.

Политическое влияние на рынки

Анализ Santiment, платформы рыночной аналитики, подчеркнул, что рынки криптовалют очень чувствительны к политическим событиям. Платформа отметила, что трейдеры часто реагируют на политические сигналы, ожидания регулирующих органов и риторику кандидатов, что делает выборы значимым фактором в краткосрочных движениях рынка.

Между тем, Santiment также отметил, что, хотя прошлые циклы наблюдали краткосрочные бычьи тенденции после выборов, предположение о том, что выборы по своей сути приводят к положительным результатам для Bitcoin, может быть преувеличено. Реакция рынка, вероятно, будет зависеть от общего политического и экономического контекста.

Следовательно, ожидается, что результаты президентских выборов в США 2024 года повлияют на настроения рынка. Согласно разведывательной платформе, независимо от того, победит ли Дональд Трамп или Камала Харрис, акцент сместится на то, как следующая администрация будет решать вопросы регулирования криптовалют.

Santiment подчеркнул, что будущее сектора может зависеть от баланса между инновационным ростом и регулирующим надзором, что заложит основу для того, как политика может сформировать глобальный ландшафт цифровых активов в течение следующих четырех лет.

Долгосрочные прогнозы остаются оптимистичными

Несмотря на немедленные предвыборные колебания, долгосрочные прогнозы для Bitcoin остаются оптимистичными. Аналитики Bernstein прогнозируют, что Bitcoin может достичь $200 000 к концу 2025 года. Гаутам Чхугани, старший криптоаналитик Bernstein, заверил инвесторов, что исход выборов не изменит восходящий путь Bitcoin.

Чхугани указал на такие критические факторы, как растущий долг США, продолжающиеся денежные проблемы и возросший интерес к биржевым фондам Bitcoin, как на ключевые факторы, лежащие в основе прогнозируемого всплеска. Он подчеркнул, что импульс роста Bitcoin вряд ли обратится вспять, что указывает на более широкий сдвиг, который превосходит результаты выборов.

Related Reads

Reviewing 8 'Cash Cow' Projects in the Bear Market: The Leader Repurchased $283 Million Worth This Year

This article highlights eight cryptocurrency projects that have demonstrated strong cash-generating capabilities and implemented significant token buyback programs during the bear market of 2026. These projects, dubbed "cash cows," are repurchasing their own tokens, often reducing supply. According to data from Tokenomist, the projects with notable buyback activity from January 1st to June 30th are: Meteora (MET), Pump.fun (PUMP), GMX, Rollbit (RLB), Metaplex (MPLX), Hyperliquid (HYPE), Lighter (LIT), and Aave. Notably, MET's buybacks equaled 71% of its January token supply, while HYPE executed the largest buyback by value at $283 million. Key project summaries include: - **Hyperliquid (HYPE):** The leader by dollar value, its perpetual DEX protocol has repurchased and burned 44 million HYPE tokens (approx. 4.4% of supply) using a significant portion of trading fees, with total buybacks exceeding $1.1 billion since March 2025. - **Meteora (MET):** Its buyback of 336.2 million MET tokens had the greatest proportional impact on its circulating supply, equivalent to 71% of its supply at the start of the year. - **Pump.fun (PUMP):** The popular memecoin launchpad has cumulatively bought back over $400 million worth of PUMP since July 2025, using 50% of net revenue for buybacks and burns since April. - **Aave (AAVE):** Despite facing a major security incident earlier in the year, the lending protocol has continued its buyback program, repurchasing over 200,000 AAVE tokens. Its team is designing a new automated buyback mechanism. - **GMX, Lighter (LIT), Rollbit (RLB), and Metaplex (MPLX)** also have active buyback mechanisms funded by protocol fees or revenues. The article concludes that while token buybacks and burns do not guarantee price appreciation—as market conditions, news, and other factors play a role—these projects stand out for their ability to generate consistent cash flow in a challenging market environment.

marsbit19m ago

Reviewing 8 'Cash Cow' Projects in the Bear Market: The Leader Repurchased $283 Million Worth This Year

marsbit19m ago

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

Ethereum is back in focus with the announcement of the "Lean Ethereum" upgrade roadmap, described by Vitalik Buterin as Ethereum's third major update. This proposal aims to fundamentally redesign the consensus, data, and execution layers from first principles, striving to make Ethereum **simpler, more secure (quantum-resistant), more verifiable, and more scalable.** The announcement comes amidst a broader restructuring within the ecosystem, including a 20% staff reduction at the Ethereum Foundation and the emergence of new organizations like EthLabs. This has sparked a debate among Ethereum supporters ("E-bizens"). **Optimists** view Lean Ethereum as a critical refocusing on core protocol fundamentals: * **sassal.eth** calls it the ultimate bullish catalyst, envisioning a future where running a node is so lightweight it could be done on a smartwatch, greatly enhancing decentralization. * **Ryan Sean Adams** sees it as Ethereum moving from "narrative expansion" to "protocol hardening," addressing long-term foundational issues like security and scalability. * Analysts like **BITWU** and **蓝狐 (Blue Fox)** frame it as a third-phase evolution towards a "minimal, durable, and credible base layer" designed for the next decade. * **gigi发财猪** interprets the organizational changes as Ethereum "shedding old baggage and forming new teams" for a lighter, more agile approach. * **Xiyu** notes that the roadmap itself provides a much-needed new narrative for market sentiment recovery. **Cautious voices** acknowledge the vision but emphasize execution and market timing: * **Ignas** warns that while the roadmap addresses key community requests, it overlooks tokenomics, and competitors are gaining ground in areas like RWA. Timely delivery is crucial; delays could be bearish. * **Dankrad Feist**, a former Ethereum Foundation researcher, agrees on direction but criticizes the proposed 3-4 year timeline as too slow for the current market pace, especially with AI-aided development available. **In summary,** optimists believe Lean Ethereum reaffirms Ethereum's long-term value proposition as a decentralized world computer, while the cautious argue that its success hinges on faster delivery and tangible results to maintain market relevance. Despite ongoing criticism, the move signals Ethereum's effort to regroup and reclaim initiative at the protocol level.

marsbit1h ago

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

marsbit1h ago

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

【AI Accessibility Gap Widens: Elite Tools Like Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming Privileged】 We are witnessing a growing "AI divide." A stark reality is emerging: a tiny fraction of elites, primarily in tech, are using powerful next-generation models like Fable 5 or the upcoming GPT-5.6, while the vast majority of the public only has access to "toys" - free, limited models equivalent to ChatGPT's basic versions (8B to 30B parameters). This creates a massive experiential chasm and cognitive dissonance. Industry outsiders see AI as overhyped and ineffective, unable to grasp its transformative potential, while insiders leverage these advanced models for a decisive competitive edge. The gap isn't just about model quality but product functionality. Free users get a simple chatbot. Paying elites get integrated workflow systems—capable of creating specialized agents, processing complex data, and handling real-world tasks like management, coding, and planning. Demos showcasing AI planning weddings or building apps feel disconnected from everyday needs like managing bills, groceries, or health. The cost barrier is immense, with reports of engineers spending $1000 daily on Fable 5 inference. Elite users employ sophisticated multi-model workflows, combining different AIs for ideation, architecture, execution, and review, completing complex projects in minutes instead of weeks. This divide extends to critical areas like healthcare, where free models are dangerously unreliable for medical queries. However, some argue that for 90% of common business tasks, mid-tier models like GPT-5.5 are sufficient; the perceived limitation often stems from poor integration and lack of context, not model intelligence. Ultimately, unequal access to cutting-edge AI is creating a new form of social stratification, where the most powerful tools are becoming the exclusive privilege of a few.

marsbit1h ago

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

marsbit1h ago

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

In June, Cathie Wood's ARK Invest purchased $77 million worth of publicly traded crypto-related stocks, including Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish, during Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years. This aligns with the investment thesis that such stocks offer a compliant way to gain exposure to the crypto cycle without directly holding Bitcoin. However, data analysis reveals significant drawbacks. A group of nine U.S.-listed crypto companies showed 30-day annualized realized volatility between 68% and 90%, nearly double Bitcoin's 37.6%. Over 90 days, Circle's volatility reached 103.6% versus Bitcoin's 37.8%. Drawdowns were also more severe for stocks like Circle (-51.4%) and MicroStrategy (-48.6%) compared to Bitcoin's -36.4% from its January high. Correlation analysis shows most stocks share only a moderate link to Bitcoin. For example, Circle, Robinhood, and Bullish have a 90-day correlation coefficient of just 0.55–0.58 with BTC, meaning only about one-third of their price movement is explained by Bitcoin's action. The rest stems from company-specific risks: earnings, competition, fundraising, and equity dilution. MicroStrategy (MSTR) is the notable exception, acting as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy with a beta of 1.59 and 0.85 correlation. Coinbase offers relatively balanced exposure. Circle exemplifies "crypto-wrapped" corporate risk, with its recent crash tied to stablecoin competition, not Bitcoin. Robinhood's diversified business insulates it from crypto downturns but also limits upside. Bitcoin miners like RIOT and MARA have posted significant gains year-to-date, driven primarily by their pivot to AI compute services, not Bitcoin's price. The article highlights that investing in crypto stocks often means accepting amplified volatility or layering on business-specific risks absent from direct Bitcoin ownership. For instance, MicroStrategy's recent challenges—its market value falling below its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV <1) and facing potential Bitcoin sales for liquidity—demonstrate equity-specific hazards like dilution and financing pressures not faced by a direct Bitcoin holder. ARK's buying spree represents a bet on a basket of different business models with varying crypto exposure, not a simple, lower-risk substitute for holding Bitcoin.

marsbit1h ago

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片