К декабрю активы американских биткоин-ETF превзойдут запасы Сатоши Накамото

investing.ruPublished on 2024-10-30Last updated on 2024-10-30

Happycoin.club - Аналитик Bloomberg ETF Эрик Балчунас прогнозирует, что к декабрю количество BTC в американских биржевых фондов на основе биткоина (ETF) может превысить активы Сатоши Накамото.

При текущих темпах накопления примерно 17 000 BTC в неделю ETF могут набрать 1 миллион BTC на следующей неделе. Эта динамика позволит превзойти активы Накамото, которые оцениваются примерно в 1,1 миллиона BTC, уже в декабре этого года.

Активы биткоин-ETF Источник: X/Balchunas

Недавний приток средств в спотовые биткоин-ETF добавляет убедительности этому прогнозу. За последние 12 торговых дней биржевые фонды на основе BTC привлекли капитал на сумму около $4 млрд, причём только BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) получил около $2,6 млрд.

Ежедневные притоки в биткоин-ETF. Источник: SoSoValue

В то же время Балчунас отметил, что непредсказуемость на рынке криптовалют может повлиять на обозначенные им сроки. Однако он оговорился, что даже при условии массовой распродажи главной криптовалюты, рост фондов останется на восходящей траектории.

Может произойти всё, что угодно, например, сильная распродажа, но всё это задержка неизбежного. С другой стороны, если цены продолжат расти, победит Трамп, мы можем увидеть, как может сработать FOMO, и все пройдёт быстрее.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Happycoin.club

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手2m ago

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手2m ago

Strategy executes first Bitcoin sale under new treasury framework to fund dividends

Strategy has sold 3,588 Bitcoin for approximately $216 million, executing its newly adopted Digital Credit Capital Framework for the first time. The sale was conducted to fund dividends on the company's Digital Credit securities. This transaction reduced Strategy's Bitcoin holdings to 843,775 BTC. The recently introduced framework authorizes limited Bitcoin sales to support corporate purposes like building U.S. dollar reserves, paying dividends, and funding share repurchases, while aiming to preserve the company's long-term Bitcoin exposure. This move represents a strategic shift, integrating Bitcoin as a source of liquidity within its treasury management, rather than a departure from its accumulation strategy.

ambcrypto6m ago

Strategy executes first Bitcoin sale under new treasury framework to fund dividends

ambcrypto6m ago

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

On July 6th, Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy announced the sale of 3,588 BTC for approximately $216 million, incurring a realized loss of around $55.45 million compared to its average cost basis. This move, contradicting Saylor's long-standing "never sell" Bitcoin philosophy, was executed to pay dividends on its digital credit securities. The article traces this shift from a small "desensitization test" sale of 32 BTC in late May to the board's authorization on June 30th to sell up to $1.25 billion in Bitcoin for corporate purposes like dividends and buybacks. Analysis reveals that MicroStrategy's previous growth "flywheel"—using stock premiums to fund more Bitcoin purchases—has stalled. With its stock trading near a critical threshold (1.22x its Bitcoin NAV), issuing new shares would dilute value. Simultaneously, its financing channels (preferred stock, common stock ATM, convertible notes) are constrained while facing rigid annual dividend/interest obligations of roughly $1.76 billion. Consequently, selling Bitcoin became the calculated "optimal solution" under its own financial model. This transforms MicroStrategy from crypto's most prominent steady buyer into a predictable seller, creating a potential overhead of ~2,400 BTC in monthly selling pressure if obligations are fully covered by sales. This shift challenges the valuation models of the entire Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) sector that emulated MicroStrategy. The company's path forward now hinges on Bitcoin's price recovery, which would allow its preferred stock to trade at par and reopen its financing flywheel, creating a cyclical dependency between the firm's financial model and the asset it holds.

链捕手31m ago

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

链捕手31m ago

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

Author: Chloe, ChainCatcher Last week, Open Standard launched the dollar stablecoin OpenUSD (OUSD) with a list of over 140 supposedly supporting companies, including major names like Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, American Express, BlackRock, BNY, Standard Chartered, Google, Shopify, Samsung, Coinbase, Solana, and Ripple. The announcement initially impacted Circle's stock price, but doubts about the list quickly emerged. Several Korean firms named, including Samsung Electronics, Shinhan Financial Group, Dunamu (Upbit's parent), and K Bank, clarified they had not formally agreed to join the alliance. Some stated they were only approached for potential interest or learned of their inclusion from news reports, expressing surprise. Similar concerns were raised by U.S. entities, suggesting the list may be misleading. OUSD, led by Zach Abrams of Bridge (acquired by Stripe in 2024), promotes zero-fee minting/redemption, no transaction limits, and sharing reserve asset yields with partners instead of keeping profits. However, this model makes listed partnership imply economic benefits, turning it into a serious credibility issue. This incident reflects a common crypto marketing tactic of leveraging big names. A Chainstory analysis found over 62% of crypto press releases in late 2025 were high-risk or scams. The situation recalls Facebook's Libra (later Diem), which collapsed in 2022 after initial heavyweight backers like Visa and PayPal withdrew under regulatory pressure. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire welcomed the competition but highlighted the challenges. He argued stablecoin success relies on network effects and real usage, not just alliances. He criticized OUSD's "free" model and full revenue sharing as potentially starving infrastructure development. Noting the dominance of USDT (~$1.84T) and USDC (~$730B) in the ~$2.91T stablecoin market, he suggested many new entrants lack real utility despite inflated circulation from incentives. In conclusion, while OUSD has genuine backing and a distinct model, its future depends on actual adoption in B2B payments, settlements, and cross-border transactions, not just a prestigious partner list. The market will determine if it is a credible challenger or merely another marketing promise.

链捕手33m ago

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

链捕手33m ago

Ripple completes MiCA licensing as EU enters post-transition era

Ripple has obtained full authorization under the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework from Luxembourg's financial regulator (CSSF). This Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) license, finalized shortly after the MiCA transition period ended on July 1, allows Ripple to offer its regulated crypto payments and services across all 30 countries of the European Economic Area under a single regulatory framework. The approval positions Ripple as fully compliant in the post-transition era and strengthens its European expansion strategy, complementing its existing Electronic Money Institution license. This brings Ripple's global portfolio to over 75 regulatory licenses, reinforcing its focus on regulated growth for institutional clients.

ambcrypto45m ago

Ripple completes MiCA licensing as EU enters post-transition era