链上 Meta 的短暂一生:从“野蛮生长”到“优雅退场” 7 个关键阶段

链捕手Published on 2024-10-28Last updated on 2024-10-28

作者:Game

编译:深潮TechFlow

 

1.Meta 的诞生

  • 一个崭新的“Meta”出现,伴随着基础的“背景故事”,可能是新技术、新参与者、巧妙的营销策略或它们的结合。

  • 需要具备一种能够迅速通过社交网络传播的病毒式元素。

  • 这通常在早期阶段对大多数参与者来说是难以察觉的,可能只有对该领域非常了解的人才能意识到。

2.早期行动者与叙事的形成

  • 早期敏锐的链上玩家识别出这种局势并抢占先机。这些早期行动者虽然尚未被广泛关注,但逐渐成为新 Meta 的关键意见领袖 (KOL)。

  • 对他们来说,收益潜力巨大:资产价值可能增长 100 倍,并且社交关注度也会增加。由于粉丝较少且对价格波动影响小,即使在低流动性情况下,风险也较低。

  • 随着他们开始发布内容,其他人也逐渐关注。价格上涨,参与度激增,叙事逐渐成型。

  • Meta 的初期赢家浮现,确立自己在这一周期中的主要地位。

3.新的 Beta 涌入

  • 随着强劲的资金流入,新的 betas(次要玩法)涌现——有些是原创的,有些则是模仿的。

  • 这些玩法仍然有利可图,因为目前还没有人能确定“真正”的次要赢家会是什么样子。只要你行动够早,使用简单思维仍然是安全的。

4.首批 KOL 阶段和第三梯队交易所上市

  • 大型账户开始入场,支持特定的代码并制造 FOMO(害怕错过)。后来的参与者往往在 KOL 推崇的项目上投入过多。

  • 第三梯队交易所会列出早期的赢家,为这些项目增加了可信度并吸引了更多参与者,从而进一步扩大社交影响力。

  • 这是一个从 KOL 推广的代码中获利的明智时机(尤其是当涉及到可疑的 KOL 时),除非该代码已被证明是明确的赢家或先行者。此时并不是预测市场顶部的时机,但可以开始更加理性地操作。

5.中等程度的宣传浪潮

  • 如果叙事依然强劲,它将吸引中等程度的宣传,激发新的兴趣并塑造即将到来的“公众”资金流入的故事。即使没有新的资金流入,现有买家的期待仍能推动价格上涨。

  • 已经确立的赢家可能会在一级和二级交易所上市,通常是永续合约,为使用杠杆交易提供了空间。

6.PvP 阶段

  • 晚期 KOL 骗局出现:拉高出货、可疑的预售、内部发行。资本从后期的 FOMO 买家转移到投机者手中。

  • 有经验的早期玩家识别出这种 PvP 模式,转向更短期的持有和更高风险的操作以快速获利,导致代币在数小时内剧烈波动。许多人在此阶段开始亏损,这不再是简单模式。

  • 早期玩家可能因全天候的紧张操作而疲惫,或者因失去早期收益而感到挫败,因此选择锁定早期阶段的利润以避免损失。

  • 一些人开始利用之前顶级交易所的上市机会进行做空。

7.冷却与整合阶段

  • 群组聊天和社交媒体动态逐渐变得安静,退出和获利了结的信号增多。

  • 价格下跌,市场叙事开始放缓并逐渐消退。

  • 次要项目(Betas)和代理项目受到最严重的冲击,跌幅和之前的涨幅一样迅速。初期的赢家则在此时进行整合。

  • 剩余的讨论主要由超级早期的持有者或在这一周期中形成的忠实追随者进行。

  • 交易者开始寻找其他市场的新 Meta,将他们的资金流动转移到其他领域。

  • 这个 Meta 在创造了大量财富并深深植入人们心中后可能会继续存在,但市场的总体冷却是必要且健康的,尤其是对于一个自主交易很少的市场。

随着周期的发展,你应该逐步减少风险;在初期要积极进取,而在后期则应更为谨慎和理性。

Related Reads

Embodied Intelligence 'Gaokao' is Insanely Hard, Humans Score 100, Best Model Only 12.8

Embodied AI Faces a Daunting "Everest": New Benchmark Reveals Huge Gap Between Models and Humans A comprehensive new benchmark for robotic manipulation, RoboDojo, has been released, painting a stark picture of the current state of embodied AI. It serves as a unified evaluation platform covering both simulation and real-world robot tasks. The benchmark assesses five core capabilities: Generalization (adapting to new scenes/objects), Memory, Precision manipulation, Long-Horizon multi-step tasks, and Open semantic understanding. It includes 42 simulation tasks and 18 standardized real-world tasks across three dual-arm robot platforms. The results are sobering. In simulation, the best-performing generalist robot policy achieved an average success rate of only 8.80%. Performance in the real world was slightly higher but still low, with the top model succeeding 12.8% of the time on average. In stark contrast, human experts scored 76.03% in simulation and 100% in real-world tests. The benchmark highlights significant, uneven gaps in current models' abilities. While some excel in specific areas like visual recognition or simple actions, they struggle with reliability, especially in long-horizon tasks where errors accumulate and in open-ended semantic instructions. The low scores, particularly in real-world deployment with physical uncertainties like camera noise and contact dynamics, underscore that today's models are far from being robust, general-purpose operational robots. RoboDojo is more than just a ranking; it's an infrastructure designed for fair, reproducible comparison. Its companion system, XPolicyLab, standardizes the interface for different models to be evaluated. Maintained by an academic consortium without commercial ties, it aims to provide a community-wide "altitude meter" to track genuine progress toward reliable and generalizable robot manipulation.

marsbit2m ago

Embodied Intelligence 'Gaokao' is Insanely Hard, Humans Score 100, Best Model Only 12.8

marsbit2m ago

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

Lilian Weng, former OpenAI security VP and co-founder of Thinking Machines Lab, has published a new blog post titled "Harness Engineering for Self-Improvement," proposing a pragmatic path for AI self-evolution. She argues that Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) may practically begin at the "Harness" layer—the external runtime system governing how models use tools, manage context, and execute tasks—rather than directly from the model rewriting its own weights. The blog outlines a progression from optimizing prompts (Context Engineering) to designing workflows, and ultimately to Self-Improving Harness systems. These systems can identify their own weaknesses, propose targeted, verifiable modifications to the harness code, and validate improvements. Works like Self-Harness and Darwin Gödel Machine (DGM) demonstrate significant performance gains on benchmarks like SWE-bench through such automated harness evolution, rivaling handcrafted agents. DeepSeek researcher Tianyi Cui endorsed the view, noting harness-based self-evolution is as promising as model-based approaches. Weng emphasizes this is complementary to model training, with both reinforcing each other. However, key challenges remain: weak evaluators for subjective tasks, reward hacking, diversity collapse, managing long-term system health versus short-term success, and defining the human oversight role. The consensus is growing: the harness is a critical variable, as the same model can exhibit vastly different capabilities within different harness systems.

marsbit1h ago

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片