Суд штата Юта признал майнинговые устройства Green Boxes ценными бумагами

investing.ruPublished on 2024-09-26Last updated on 2024-09-26

SEC утверждает, что Green United и ее руководители Райт Терстон (Wright Thurston) и Кристоффер Крон (Kristoffer Krohn) обманывали инвесторов, рекламируя Green Boxes как устройства, способные добывать «зеленые токены» GREEN. Однако устройства использовались для добычи биткоинов, о чем инвесторам не сообщалось. По данным регулятора, раздача токенов GREEN была произвольной и находилась под контролем Терстона, а не совершались в результате майнинговой деятельности.

Судья Энн Мари МакИфф Аллен (Ann Marie McIff Allen) объявила: устройства для майнинга Green Boxes соответствуют юридическому определению ценных бумаг в соответствии с законодательством США. SEC смогла доказать в этом деле наличие инвестиционного контракта, поскольку инвесторам продавались сами устройства — плюс заключались соглашение о хостинге Green Boxes. Компания Green United создавала у инвесторов впечатление, будто те добывают токены GREEN с помощью устройств для майнинга — хотя на самом деле инвесторы получали токены GREEN по усмотрению руководства компании, указано в постановлении суда.

Суд отказался принять ходатайство Green United, в котором компания утверждала, что SEC не имеет права регулировать токены GREEN, а принудительные меры ведомства выходят за рамки его полномочий. Судья отклонила доводы Green United, заявив, что ведомство четко изложило свою позицию.

В марте 2023 года SEC обвинила Green United в обмане инвесторов на $18 млн и скрытой покупке оборудования для майнинга криптоактивов. Компания вводила инвесторов в заблуждение, обещая доход от размещения криптоактивов в размере от 40% до 50%, счел регулятор. Вместо «зеленых майнеров» компания приобрела устройства ASIC Bitmain Antminer S9, что противоречит заявленным характеристикам проекта, указано в иске SEC.

Несколько лет назад Комиссия по ценным бумагам и биржам SEC Филиппин приравняла контракты на облачный майнинг к ценным бумагам. За незарегистрированную эмиссию ценных бумаг на Филиппинах нарушителям грозит 21 год тюрьмы.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Bits.media

Related Reads

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

The domestic embodied AI data industry has attracted nearly 100 players, with 70 focused on data collection and 27 on data infrastructure. In the past year, 15 independent embodied data service providers raised approximately 4.47 billion yuan. Despite this growth, the sector remains early-stage, fragmented, and faces significant challenges. Data collection methods are diverse, categorized into four main routes: teleoperation of real robots, human demonstration without a robot (using motion capture, exoskeletons, etc.), simulation synthesis, and distillation from internet videos. Most companies (43%) adopt hybrid approaches, combining multiple routes, as no single method can meet all training needs. Teleoperation alone is pursued by 31% of players, often by state-owned platforms and robot companies, while newer firms favor asset-light, no-hardware human demonstration. Independent data service providers now form the largest player group (40%), indicating the emergence of a distinct industry segment rather than just a subsidiary function for robot makers. Two-thirds of all players are "embodied-native" startups, while one-third are companies that pivoted from fields like AI data annotation, which are more prevalent in the data infrastructure layer. Current annual industry capacity is estimated at 1.6-1.8 million hours plus 70-80 million data points, with a short-term goal to increase this 15-20 fold within 1-3 years. Data collection factories are spread across 20 provinces in China, concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and Pearl River Delta regions. Financially, the 4.47 billion yuan raised in the past year pales compared to the 43.8 billion yuan raised by the broader embodied intelligence sector in just the first half of 2026, highlighting that data remains a less "sexy" bet for investors. The 15 funded independent providers show clear stratification: a top tier led by a unicorn (Lightwheel Intelligence, 3.1 billion yuan), a middle tier of 11 firms raising tens to hundreds of millions, and an early-stage tier of 3 companies. Sixty-nine investment institutions have participated, but none have made concentrated bets, reflecting uncertainty about viable business models. Over half of these funded companies are less than a year old, most are at pre-A or A rounds, and profitability remains largely unproven. In summary, the embodied data industry has become an independent track creating jobs and local economic activity. However, it is still nascent, with unformed consensus, unsolved problems, and unproven business models. The coming 1-2 years will be a critical validation window to see if companies can build sustainable, profitable businesses purely by "selling data."

marsbit43m ago

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

marsbit43m ago

Dialogue with Multicoin Partner: The Crypto Market Has Bottomed Out, Favoring Three Cryptocurrencies in This Cycle

In a recent interview, Multicoin Capital managing partner Tushar Jain shared his views on the crypto market. He believes the market has bottomed and is at an inflection point, citing that negative news no longer causes significant price declines and application adoption continues to grow. Jain remains highly bullish on Solana, viewing it as the correct architectural choice for internet capital markets, particularly for spot and tokenized security trading. He is also positive on Hyperliquid, noting its leadership in decentralized derivatives trading. His investment approach focuses on concentrating capital in top convictions rather than equal allocation. A distinct opportunity he highlights is Zcash (ZEC), which he sees as a return to the industry's cypherpunk ethos and a potential top-five asset by market cap. For assets like Zcash without cash flows, his valuation framework is based on relative market cap ranking. Regarding investment strategy, Jain employs a "three-part" entry method to avoid timing pitfalls and emphasizes long-term "active management" over "active trading." He outlines four sources of investment edge: informational, analytical, behavioral/psychological, and structural. On portfolio management, the fund uses Bitcoin as its "cash," selling assets into Bitcoin during market euphoria to reduce beta risk and using Bitcoin to buy dips. Sales occur only if a better opportunity arises, the investment thesis breaks, or valuations become excessively overheated. While respectful of Ethereum's resilience, he questions its unclear scaling roadmap. Finally, Jain reaffirms his commitment to the thesis that blockchains will form the foundational architecture for future capital markets.

marsbit1h ago

Dialogue with Multicoin Partner: The Crypto Market Has Bottomed Out, Favoring Three Cryptocurrencies in This Cycle

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片