Кто такие соло-майнеры. Сколько можно заработать на добыче биткоина

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2024-06-10Last updated on 2024-09-10

Мощность оборудования удачливого майнера сопоставима более чем с 400 актуальными устройствами. Разбираемся, кого называют майнерами-одиночками и почему они не присоединяются к традиционным пулам

10 сентября одиночный майнер с вычислительной мощностью оборудования 82 PH/s успешно добыл блок биткоина под номером 860 749, сообщил администратор пула CKPool Кон Коливас. Участник пула заработал около $180 тыс.

Майнер получил вознаграждение за найденный блок в размере 3,125 BTC ($178 тыс. по курсу $57 тыс.) и комиссию за транзакции в блоке на сумму 0,044 BTC ($2,5 тыс.).

Новые биткоины добываются майнерами, чьи компьютеры выполняют сложные вычисления, обрабатывая транзакции в блокчейне. Эти транзакции формируются в блоки, и майнеры соревнуются друг с другом за то, кто первый финализирует новый блок и добавит его в блокчейн.

rbc.group

В сети биткоина блоки добавляются примерно каждые 10 минут. Участник, добавивший блок, получает вознаграждение в новых биткоинах.

Мощность оборудования удачливого майнера Коливас назвал «массивной». Она равняется 410 устройствам Bitmain Antminer S21 с хешрейтом 200 TH/s. Имея такую вычислительную мощность, майнер имел 1 шанс из 7,8 тыс. найти блок, по расчетам платформы SoloСhance.

Кого называют одиночными майнерами

Коливас отметил, что это был уже 292 блок, добытый пользователями пула CKPool, предоставляющим услуги соло-майнерам. Платформа объединяет вычислительные мощности участников для повышения шансов нахождения блоков, но вознаграждение получает только тот, кто добыл блок первым.

Поэтому майнеров, подключенных к CKPool называют одиночными, однако по факту это может быть не один человек, а целый дата-центр, работающий в промышленных масштабах.

Размещение тех же 400 устройств для майнинга требуют специального помещения с вентиляцией и шумопоглощением, выделенных энергомощностей и постоянного обслуживания, что крайне затруднительно организовать в одиночку на бытовом уровне.

Чем промышленные майнеры отличаются от бытовых. Разница в России и в США

Майнер, не использующий пул, единолично получает полное вознаграждение за добытый блок и комиссии в этом блоке. Из-за постоянно растущей сложности добычи криптовалюты шансы самостоятельно добыть блок, даже на мощном оборудовании, практически равны нулю.

В общей сложности соло-майнеры за 10 лет (с 2014 года) добыли 329 блоков в блокчейне биткоина, подсчитала команда издания Protos.

Если одиночные майнеры добывают в среднем один блок каждые 10 месяцев, то один пул, объединяющий мощность оборудования тысяч майнеров, за тот же период добывает в среднем 43 200 блоков. Но пул при этом разделяет вознаграждение между всеми участниками пропорционально мощности их подключенного к пулу оборудования.

Related Reads

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

Former US President Donald Trump reported a record-breaking $2.2 billion in personal income for 2025, the highest annual income ever disclosed by a sitting president. This figure, from a 927-page government ethics filing, represented a 3.5-fold increase from his $600 million income in 2024 and boosted his net worth to $6.5 billion. The primary drivers were cryptocurrency (64% of income, approximately $1.4 billion) and real estate (26%, approximately $575 million). His crypto earnings stemmed largely from the launch of his personal meme coin, $TRUMP, generating over $600 million in licensing fees, and substantial profits from the WLFI token and its parent company. Despite a sluggish property market, his Mar-a-Lago resort and associated golf clubs saw revenue surges of 50% and 27%, respectively, attributed to their use as venues for presidential events. Trump's financial disclosure also revealed an unprecedented level of stock market activity, with over 22,000 trades executed in 2025, averaging 87 trades per market day. Media analyses noted several instances where significant trading coincided with major policy announcements, such as proposed tariffs, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. While the White House stated these trades were handled by a family-managed trust fund and not Trump directly, critics highlighted this as a departure from the blind trusts traditionally used by presidents post-Watergate. The report has intensified debate over the commercialization of the presidency. Supporters view it as a success story of a businessman-president, while critics argue it demonstrates an unprecedented conversion of public influence into private wealth, with policy decisions potentially linked to personal financial gains. The controversy centers on whether Trump's earnings represent innovative entrepreneurship or a fundamental conflict of interest, sparking renewed calls for stricter ethics reforms in US governance.

marsbit2m ago

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

marsbit2m ago

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手5m ago

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手5m ago

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

On July 6th, Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy announced the sale of 3,588 BTC for approximately $216 million, incurring a realized loss of around $55.45 million compared to its average cost basis. This move, contradicting Saylor's long-standing "never sell" Bitcoin philosophy, was executed to pay dividends on its digital credit securities. The article traces this shift from a small "desensitization test" sale of 32 BTC in late May to the board's authorization on June 30th to sell up to $1.25 billion in Bitcoin for corporate purposes like dividends and buybacks. Analysis reveals that MicroStrategy's previous growth "flywheel"—using stock premiums to fund more Bitcoin purchases—has stalled. With its stock trading near a critical threshold (1.22x its Bitcoin NAV), issuing new shares would dilute value. Simultaneously, its financing channels (preferred stock, common stock ATM, convertible notes) are constrained while facing rigid annual dividend/interest obligations of roughly $1.76 billion. Consequently, selling Bitcoin became the calculated "optimal solution" under its own financial model. This transforms MicroStrategy from crypto's most prominent steady buyer into a predictable seller, creating a potential overhead of ~2,400 BTC in monthly selling pressure if obligations are fully covered by sales. This shift challenges the valuation models of the entire Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) sector that emulated MicroStrategy. The company's path forward now hinges on Bitcoin's price recovery, which would allow its preferred stock to trade at par and reopen its financing flywheel, creating a cyclical dependency between the firm's financial model and the asset it holds.

链捕手34m ago

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

链捕手34m ago

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

Author: Chloe, ChainCatcher Last week, Open Standard launched the dollar stablecoin OpenUSD (OUSD) with a list of over 140 supposedly supporting companies, including major names like Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, American Express, BlackRock, BNY, Standard Chartered, Google, Shopify, Samsung, Coinbase, Solana, and Ripple. The announcement initially impacted Circle's stock price, but doubts about the list quickly emerged. Several Korean firms named, including Samsung Electronics, Shinhan Financial Group, Dunamu (Upbit's parent), and K Bank, clarified they had not formally agreed to join the alliance. Some stated they were only approached for potential interest or learned of their inclusion from news reports, expressing surprise. Similar concerns were raised by U.S. entities, suggesting the list may be misleading. OUSD, led by Zach Abrams of Bridge (acquired by Stripe in 2024), promotes zero-fee minting/redemption, no transaction limits, and sharing reserve asset yields with partners instead of keeping profits. However, this model makes listed partnership imply economic benefits, turning it into a serious credibility issue. This incident reflects a common crypto marketing tactic of leveraging big names. A Chainstory analysis found over 62% of crypto press releases in late 2025 were high-risk or scams. The situation recalls Facebook's Libra (later Diem), which collapsed in 2022 after initial heavyweight backers like Visa and PayPal withdrew under regulatory pressure. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire welcomed the competition but highlighted the challenges. He argued stablecoin success relies on network effects and real usage, not just alliances. He criticized OUSD's "free" model and full revenue sharing as potentially starving infrastructure development. Noting the dominance of USDT (~$1.84T) and USDC (~$730B) in the ~$2.91T stablecoin market, he suggested many new entrants lack real utility despite inflated circulation from incentives. In conclusion, while OUSD has genuine backing and a distinct model, its future depends on actual adoption in B2B payments, settlements, and cross-border transactions, not just a prestigious partner list. The market will determine if it is a credible challenger or merely another marketing promise.

链捕手36m ago

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

链捕手36m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片