151天市值20亿美金,通证化国债实现爆炸式增长

链得得Published on 2024-08-28Last updated on 2024-09-02

通证化国债市场已经达到了20亿美元的市值,仅仅用了151天。大量机构的投资是这一显著增长的根本原因,其中最大的参与者非贝莱德莫属。

不过,随着贝莱德美元机构数字流动性基金(BUIDL)的推出,这一切正在发生变化。目前,BUIDL的市值已经达到了5.03亿美元,几乎碾压了其他通证化国库领域的投资机构。

在四个月的时间里,BUIDL的市值增长到约5.03亿美元,成为通证化国债领域最大的单一基金

该基金的成功不仅给投资者带来了一定程度的信心,也吸引了更多投资者对通证国债的兴趣。

此外,其他知名基金的增长并不令人印象深刻。例如Franklin Templeton的OnChain美国政府货币基金FOBXX,以及Ondo Finance的美元收益率基金USDY。

这些公司的收入也有所增长,但基数较低,分别为4.25亿美元和3.64亿美元。

机构资金价值的上升不仅推动了市值的增长,还为通证化国债带来了巨大的可信度。

现在,投资者更愿意涉足这一创新金融产品,让传统的政府证券世界从区块链技术带来的好处中获益

通证化国债通过将美国国债资产数字化,在以太坊和Solana等公共区块链上提供无缝交易。

这一技术突破简化了美国国债的交易,并向包括外国人在内的更多投资者开放了美国国债市场。它将证券转化为数字通证,降低了市场准入门槛。

通证化带来的最大好处之一是流动性。对于想要赎回资金的投资者来说,通证化的证券和资产是全天候的,这与传统市场完全相反。

人们还可以通过使用智能合约将他们的通证兑换为稳定币,轻松获得现金,而无需经过传统金融市场的漫长等待

通证化国库领域的人分析师预测了一个相对乐观的前景。由于对该资产类别感兴趣的DeFi项目和DAO数量持续上升,到年底市场规模可能会略高于30亿美元。

尤其是部分公司发现通证化国债非常适合纳入其投资组合,因为这将使它们获得稳定和无风险的收益。

但是,市场也必须面对不利因素。例如宏观经济因素、投资者的负面情绪等。如果利率上升幅度过大,这种通证化资产的诱惑力就很容易消失。此外还有监管障碍问题,传统金融与区块链技术的融合在很大程度上仍是未知领域。

作者:区块链骑士;来自链得得内容开放平台“得得号”,本文仅代表作者观点,不代表链得得官方立场凡“得得号”文章,原创性和内容的真实性由投稿人保证,如果稿件因抄袭、作假等行为导致的法律后果,由投稿人本人负责得得号平台发布文章,如有侵权、违规及其他不当言论内容,请广大读者监督,一经证实,平台会立即下线。如遇文章内容问题,请联系微信:chaindd123

链得得仅提供相关信息展示,不构成任何投资建议

Related Reads

Warsh's First Conundrum: Rate Cuts, Inflation, and a Fractured Fed

Walsh's First Dilemma: Rate Cuts, Inflation, and a Divided Fed Kevin Warsh officially assumed the Fed Chairmanship on May 15th, inheriting a central bank deeply divided over inflation. Contrary to market expectations of a dovish stance due to his appointment by President Trump, Warsh's historical record shows early and consistent hawkish concerns about inflation. The Fed he leads is fractured, with three FOMC members recently dissenting against even hinting at future rate cuts. The immediate challenge is surging inflation. While the Iran-related oil shock is a temporary factor, core CPI and services inflation are accelerating, showing signs of becoming entrenched—echoing the Fed's 2022 "transitory" misstep. Warsh faces the task of building consensus within a committee where several members believe policy may not be restrictive enough, especially if the neutral interest rate (r-star) is higher than currently estimated. Politically, Warsh is caught between Trump's desire for rate cuts and the economic reality of persistent price pressures. Any move perceived as bowing to political pressure could undermine Fed independence. Market implications are significant. Long-term Treasury yields (e.g., 30-year at 5.19%) could rise further, especially if the June FOMC statement hints at possible tightening. Tech stocks face continued valuation pressure from higher rates. The key variable is progress in Iran negotiations; a breakthrough before the June meeting could temporarily ease oil-driven inflation, but stubborn services inflation would remain. All eyes are on Warsh's first post-FOMC press conference on June 17th. His wording on inflation and policy will reveal how much the market has mispriced his stance and the Fed's likely path forward.

marsbit12m ago

Warsh's First Conundrum: Rate Cuts, Inflation, and a Fractured Fed

marsbit12m ago

Harvard and Others Exit, Six Core Talents Depart in a Month: What's Happening to Ethereum?

Ethereum faces significant internal and external pressures, marked by a wave of high-profile departures from its core development team and a loss of confidence from major institutional investors. Within four months, at least seven key figures—including researchers, protocol leads, and a former executive director—have left the Ethereum Foundation. This exodus, partly triggered by controversy over a new "mission statement" requiring employee sign-off, risks derailing critical roadmap upgrades like PeerDAS and Verkle trees, and has already contributed to delays in the planned Glamsterdam upgrade. Compounding the internal instability, major institutions are reducing their exposure. Goldman Sachs slashed its iShares Ethereum Trust holdings by approximately 70%, and Harvard's endowment fund completely exited its $87 million Ethereum ETF position. Concurrently, the Ethereum Foundation itself has been unstaking and selling ETH for "treasury rebalancing," further unsettling the market. These challenges emerge as Ethereum's competitive dominance erodes. Its share of the total DeFi market has fallen to around 54%, with rivals like Solana and Base gaining ground. In fee revenue, it was recently outpaced by newer chains like Hyperliquid. Furthermore, a trend of institutions exploring proprietary or hybrid blockchains (exemplified by Circle's Arc) threatens Ethereum's position as the premier settlement layer for institutional assets. While founder Vitalik Buterin's vision for Ethereum as a secure, decentralized "technical sanctuary" and "world computer" remains clear, its realization is threatened by the concurrent loss of execution capability, institutional patience, and market share during a critical competitive phase.

链捕手52m ago

Harvard and Others Exit, Six Core Talents Depart in a Month: What's Happening to Ethereum?

链捕手52m ago

IOSG | After the Halving of Developer Count: Crypto Isn't Dead, It's Just Handing Over Talent to AI

IOSG Report: Crypto's Developer Exodus Masks a "Talent Deleveraging" and Migration to AI The number of monthly active crypto developers on GitHub has roughly halved from its 2022 peak to around 23,000. This decline is not a sign of industry collapse but a "talent deleveraging." The exodus consists largely of newcomers who entered during the bull market, while the cohort of established developers (2+ years of experience) has grown to a record high, now contributing about 70% of the code. These core builders are consolidating in ecosystems with real users and activity, like Bitcoin and Solana. The crypto industry has forged a unique skill set: building operational, trusted systems from scratch in environments with no external authority, near-zero tolerance for error, and missing rules. This involves creating trust through pure code/mechanisms and making judgments under profound technical and economic uncertainty. This capability is finding new, high-value applications in the AI era, which faces structurally similar problems: trust in opaque autonomous systems, a lack of governance frameworks, and coordination among self-interested AI agents. Key migration patterns include: 1. **Direct Hardware/Infrastructure Translation:** Projects like CoreWeave pivoted from GPU mining to AI compute supply. 2. **Mechanism Design & Trust Engineering:** Crypto's experience in decentralized coordination and incentive design (e.g., via tokenomics, staking/slashing) is being applied to critical AI challenges: * **Compute Aggregation & Verification:** Solving trust and efficiency problems in decentralized GPU networks (e.g., Hyperbolic). * **AI Agent Governance:** Using cryptoeconomic mechanisms to align the behavior of multiple autonomous AI agents (e.g., EigenLayer's approach). * **Autonomous Agent Payments:** Leveraging stablecoins and programmable money for fast, permissionless micro-transactions between AI agents (e.g., x402 protocol). The builder's role is evolving from "writing smart contracts" to "designing trust mechanisms for autonomous AI systems." This convergence is reflected in hiring trends at major firms and significant capital allocation from top venture funds like Paradigm and a16z into the crypto-AI intersection. While regional approaches differ—with the US focusing more on foundational protocol innovation and Asia on application-layer integration—the core thesis remains: the systemic skills honed in crypto's trustless environments are becoming a scarce and critical asset for scaling AI.

marsbit54m ago

IOSG | After the Halving of Developer Count: Crypto Isn't Dead, It's Just Handing Over Talent to AI

marsbit54m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片