Long-Term Correlation Between Bitcoin and Wall Street Waned as BTC Has Better Returns (Report)

CryptoPotatoPublished on 2022-06-06Last updated on 2022-06-06

Abstract

A recent report by 21Shares showed a weakening long-term correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500, with long-term crypto investments returning more.

Prior to the pandemic, Bitcoin appealed to many as an inflationary hedge due to its low (near zero) correlation with traditional assets such as stocks.
However, in recent times, the narrative has taken a 180° turn, owing to macroeconomics shifts. According to a report by 21Shares, Bitcoin and the S&P 500 moved in sync, with their correlation rising to an all-time high of 0.69. This bred uncertainty in the usefulness of crypto assets in portfolio diversification.
Bitcoin Correlation to S&P 500 Lower in the Long-term
While it does not dispute the coupling of crypto and traditional assets, 21Shares shows that this is only a short-term event. In its sixth issue on the “State of Crypto,” the company noted that the two asset classes move on distinct paths in the long term.
Additionally, the report showed that at 0.07, there is almost no correlation between Bitcoin and gold. From this, 21Shares concluded that the two assets present “unique diversification resources for investors’ portfolios.”
As for returns, many crypto players focus on the timing of their investments, seeking a suitable period when returns will be highest. Crypto investments have been impacted by events such as the downfall of the Terra ecosystem, Fed interest rate hikes, and the recent Solana blockchain halt, among others.
The effect of prevailing market conditions has also been seen among institutional investors. Just last month, many of them withdrew funds from crypto investment products, causing a 10-month low in assets under management (AUM).
Differently, the report concluded that timing, in most instances, is not an important factor when making crypto investments. In 90% of cases, Bitcoin outperformed itself within a year regardless of when it was invested. The digital asset’s price movements were even better when invested for three years in 100% of cases.
For this reason, the firm noted that adding crypto assets to one’s investment portfolio “maximizes risk-adjusted returns.” Additionally, better returns are seen in “large-cap crypto” portfolios compared to “Bitcoin-only” portfolios.
Crypto Adoption on the Rise
That said, Eliézer Ndinga, director of research at 21Shares, said many companies and institutions have made similar conclusions, “realiz[ing] how strongly the asset class performs long-term despite ups and downs.”
Note that several giant institutions, such as Bank of America (BoA), have moved away from their hostile approach towards cryptocurrencies to a more accommodative attitude. And even though the bank said it has no plans to offer crypto services, it still admitted that Bitcoin and crypto are too big to ignore.

Related Reads

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit34m ago

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片