随着特朗普在Polymarket上的平局达到48%,卡玛拉的获胜几率下降

币界网Published on 2024-08-18Last updated on 2024-08-18

币界网报道:

卡玛拉·哈里斯只是在受伤的地方受到了打击——几率。目前,加密货币博彩平台Polymarket显示,她和特朗普势均力敌,获胜的几率为48%。

卡玛拉已经骑得很高了一段时间,但最近的发展表明她已经失去了控制。特朗普的副总统JD Vance声称,他的内部数据显示卡玛拉的支持率已经“稳定”

Kamala's winning odds dip as Trump ties at 48% on Polymarket

它对加密货币有什么作用

让我们来谈谈房间里的大象:加密货币。Kamala对加密货币一直非常谨慎,因为加密货币在市场上并不受欢迎。

与特朗普不同,他现在显然是加密货币的拉拉队长,卡玛拉的谨慎态度引起了一些严重的焦虑。

自从她的赔率开始攀升以来,比特币就陷入了一种困境,一种紧密的整合。市场紧张,这是有充分理由的。

伯恩斯坦公司的分析师一直在密切关注这一情况。他们拿?在我们更清楚地了解谁可能入主白宫之前,比特币不会去任何地方。

贺锦丽

这意味着,在9月总统辩论开始之前,我们可能不会看到太多进展。卡玛拉是拜登政府的一员,我们都知道加密货币的情况。

如果卡玛拉获胜,他们在过去四年中采取的方法可能会继续下去。如果你希望有一个更加密友好的环境,这不是好消息。

当然,卡玛拉可能会调整一些政策,与特朗普的亲加密方法竞争,但也许不要指望任何激进的事情?

两党监管的希望

现在,并不是每个人都失去了希望。加密货币行业的一些人持谨慎乐观态度。他们认为,卡玛拉担任总统实际上可能会就如何监管美国的数字资产达成一些两党协议。

像马克·库班这样的人甚至表示,与拜登相比,卡玛拉可能“对商业、人工智能、加密货币和政府即服务更加开放”。

这是一个好主意,但在我们看到一些真正的政策出台之前,这一切都只是猜测。但当你把它分解时,民意调查数据也显示了另一幅有趣的画面。

Kamala's winning odds dip as Trump ties at 48% on Polymarket

存在明显的性别差异。卡玛拉在女性中领先,而特朗普在男性中具有很强的优势。例如,《泰晤士报》/锡耶纳的民意调查显示,卡玛拉在女性中领先21个百分点(56%对35%),但在男性中落后14个百分点(39%对52%)。

然后是种族分歧。考虑到历史投票模式,卡玛拉在黑人选民中得到了坚定的支持,这并不奇怪。另一方面,特朗普正在吸引更多白人选民的支持。

在战场州,卡玛拉仍然领先,但差距很小。8月初的《纽约时报》/锡耶纳学院民意调查显示,卡玛拉在密歇根州、威斯康星州和宾夕法尼亚州以50%对46%的得票率领先特朗普。

但密歇根州的误差幅度约为4.8分,威斯康星州和宾夕法尼亚州的误差略高于4分,情况很容易发生逆转。卡玛拉在这些州可能有优势,但这远非板上钉钉。

Related Reads

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

The Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing its most complex structural adjustment since inception. Despite Bitcoin's price holding near $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching a record 1 ZH/s, miner profitability is deteriorating. The industry is operating close to its breakeven point, with the 2028 halving expected to accelerate consolidation. The challenges extend beyond the halving's subsidy reduction; the industry's revenue model has yet to successfully transition towards a fee-driven structure. Increasingly, mining companies are evolving from simple Bitcoin producers into infrastructure and energy operators, including providers of AI/HPC computing power. Competition is shifting from pure hash rate expansion to business model upgrades. Economic pressure is evident. The theoretical daily mining revenue at current prices is around $78 million, yet the actual figure is only about $33 million—a 136% gap. Transaction fees remain low at roughly $220k daily, far below historical implied levels. With a current estimated industry-wide breakeven price near $65,000, mining alone is struggling to generate ideal profits. The 2028 halving is projected to push the fundamental production cost floor to approximately $93,289. This will likely accelerate a shift towards consolidation among larger, well-capitalized miners with diversified revenue streams. Competitive advantage will belong to institutionalized players with access to low-cost energy, AI/HPC hosting operations, and stronger balance sheets. In essence, Bitcoin mining is transitioning from a "mining business" to an "infrastructure business." Future profitability and resilience will depend less on block rewards and more on diversified income sources like energy management and computational infrastructure services. For investors, the key question is not the halving itself, but which miners can successfully navigate this business model transformation.

marsbit1h ago

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

marsbit1h ago

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

Andrej Karpathy, a prominent figure in AI, has reportedly joined Anthropic, leading to a noticeable decrease in his open-source contributions and social media activity. A document claiming to be his personal "CLAUDE.md" file—a set of instructions for the Claude AI to follow within a specific codebase—has been circulating online. While its authenticity is unverified, the content aligns closely with Karpathy's publicly shared principles on effective AI-assisted programming. The document outlines key rules for AI coding assistants, emphasizing the importance of reading existing code thoroughly before writing new code to maintain consistency. It advises against over-engineering, advocating for simple, surgical modifications that match the project's existing style. Other guidelines include clarifying assumptions upfront, writing meaningful tests, thoughtful debugging, and carefully considering dependencies. The core message is that these principles help prevent common AI coding failures, such as introducing unnecessary abstractions, style drift, or making invisible architectural decisions. The community has noted that even experts like Karpathy require detailed instructions to guide AI effectively, akin to managing a junior developer. A related GitHub repository, "andrej-karpathy-skills," which encapsulates these ideas, is reported to significantly reduce Claude's code error rate. Ultimately, the advice stresses that the best CLAUDE.md is tailored to one's own tech stack and coding practices.

marsbit1h ago

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片