Ripple首席技术官强调人工智能对危险蘑菇识别书的争议

币界网Published on 2024-08-18Last updated on 2024-08-18

币界网报道:

Ripple的首席技术官David Schwartz最近在他的社交媒体账户上发布了一条在Reddit上疯传的帖子,该帖子告诉了一个家庭在食用有毒蘑菇后入院的故事,他们通过一本人工智能生成的书确认了有毒蘑菇。

根据Reddit上的帖子,这家人使用了他们从一家受欢迎的商店买的蘑菇识别书。该帖子称,这本书提供了人工智能创建的图像和文本来识别蘑菇,但它们都是有毒的。这家人在AI写的书的帮助下吃掉了蘑菇,他们都住进了医院,这对AI的内容来说是一个很大的问号。

Ripple首席技术官将历史诉讼相提并论

该帖子还表示,书中不仅有人工智能图片,而且书中的聊天机器人回复称没有人参与其中。尽管零售商显然已经为这本书提供了退款,但这个问题让人们质疑是否会有更多由人工智能编写的低质书籍出售。

施瓦茨在他的社交媒体帖子中将这一事件与20世纪90年代初发生的一起著名诉讼进行了比较。这位Ripple高管引用了1991年上诉法院的Winter诉G.P.Putnam's Sons案。该案例指出,两名年轻人决定购买一本名为《蘑菇百科全书》的书作为参考。

这对夫妇被迫就产品责任、疏忽和虚假陈述寻求对P.Putnam's Sons的法律干预。尽管这两位蘑菇猎人因书中提供的错误信息而差点丧命,但法院还是做出了有利于出版商的裁决。

识别指南面临人工智能使用的审查

施瓦茨对这个案例的使用表明,在内容创作中使用人工智能并不是一件好事,而且会产生法律后果。随着越来越多的内容在人工智能的帮助下被制作出来,人工智能生成的书籍是否可以接受类似的法律程序仍有待商榷。

施瓦茨写了一篇关于Quora的X帖子,Quora是一个受欢迎的问答网站。这不是Ripple首席技术官第一次批评这个网站以及人工智能是如何在上面使用的。施瓦茨在他的帖子中强调了Quora的人工智能产生的一些问题,他称之为“人工智能生成的垃圾”

Related Reads

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

The Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing its most complex structural adjustment since inception. Despite Bitcoin's price holding near $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching a record 1 ZH/s, miner profitability is deteriorating. The industry is operating close to its breakeven point, with the 2028 halving expected to accelerate consolidation. The challenges extend beyond the halving's subsidy reduction; the industry's revenue model has yet to successfully transition towards a fee-driven structure. Increasingly, mining companies are evolving from simple Bitcoin producers into infrastructure and energy operators, including providers of AI/HPC computing power. Competition is shifting from pure hash rate expansion to business model upgrades. Economic pressure is evident. The theoretical daily mining revenue at current prices is around $78 million, yet the actual figure is only about $33 million—a 136% gap. Transaction fees remain low at roughly $220k daily, far below historical implied levels. With a current estimated industry-wide breakeven price near $65,000, mining alone is struggling to generate ideal profits. The 2028 halving is projected to push the fundamental production cost floor to approximately $93,289. This will likely accelerate a shift towards consolidation among larger, well-capitalized miners with diversified revenue streams. Competitive advantage will belong to institutionalized players with access to low-cost energy, AI/HPC hosting operations, and stronger balance sheets. In essence, Bitcoin mining is transitioning from a "mining business" to an "infrastructure business." Future profitability and resilience will depend less on block rewards and more on diversified income sources like energy management and computational infrastructure services. For investors, the key question is not the halving itself, but which miners can successfully navigate this business model transformation.

marsbit1h ago

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

marsbit1h ago

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

Andrej Karpathy, a prominent figure in AI, has reportedly joined Anthropic, leading to a noticeable decrease in his open-source contributions and social media activity. A document claiming to be his personal "CLAUDE.md" file—a set of instructions for the Claude AI to follow within a specific codebase—has been circulating online. While its authenticity is unverified, the content aligns closely with Karpathy's publicly shared principles on effective AI-assisted programming. The document outlines key rules for AI coding assistants, emphasizing the importance of reading existing code thoroughly before writing new code to maintain consistency. It advises against over-engineering, advocating for simple, surgical modifications that match the project's existing style. Other guidelines include clarifying assumptions upfront, writing meaningful tests, thoughtful debugging, and carefully considering dependencies. The core message is that these principles help prevent common AI coding failures, such as introducing unnecessary abstractions, style drift, or making invisible architectural decisions. The community has noted that even experts like Karpathy require detailed instructions to guide AI effectively, akin to managing a junior developer. A related GitHub repository, "andrej-karpathy-skills," which encapsulates these ideas, is reported to significantly reduce Claude's code error rate. Ultimately, the advice stresses that the best CLAUDE.md is tailored to one's own tech stack and coding practices.

marsbit1h ago

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片