2024年美国大选：共和党人对加密PAC的300万美元民主党支持感到不满

币界网Published on 2024-08-15Last updated on 2024-08-15

币界网报道：

据报道，支持加密货币的政治团体Fairshake PAC将在2024年美国大选前斥资300万美元支持两个州的民主党候选人。美国全国广播公司新闻报道称，共和党人对亚利桑那州支持民主党人鲁本·加莱戈和密歇根州支持民主党的Elissa Slotkin的团体感到不满。

共和党总统候选人唐纳德·特朗普和他的副总统竞选伙伴J.D.万斯一直是加密货币领域的坚定支持者。虽然选举即将结束，但出口民调已经开始倾向于民主党总统候选人卡玛拉·哈里斯。

Fairshake PAC将斥资300万美元支持民主党

支持加密货币监管的政治行动组织在参议院竞选中支持了两名民主党候选人。美国全国广播公司报道称，Fairshake PAC已誓言斥资300万美元支持亲加密的民主党人、亚利桑那州的Ruben Gallego和密歇根州的Elissa Slotkin。该报告发布之际，Fairshake PAC试图通过拨款1200万美元击败俄亥俄州的民主党参议员和加密货币怀疑论者Sherrod Brown。

据报道，共和党人对支持反对派的加密货币社区感到不满。考虑到共和党总统候选人唐纳德·特朗普和他的副总统竞选伙伴J.D.万斯将自己描绘成加密货币行业的盟友。

由于商人Marc Andreessen和他的商业伙伴Ben Horowitz是Fairshake的财务支持者，并支持特朗普竞选总统，此事变得更加复杂。与此同时，最新的选举民调倾向于卡玛拉·哈里斯。

Polymarket在2024年美国大选前下注

截至发稿时，Polymarket上45%的选举赌注认为特朗普将赢得2024年美国大选。哈里斯保持领先，54%的赌注对她有利。在参议院竞选中，共和党人以71%的赌注保持领先，而民主党人在竞选纲领上的支持率为29%。

哈里斯的胜利对BTC来说“不太有利”

在11月投票几个月后，加密货币仍然是两党选举的一个问题。CoinShares的报告发现，特朗普的经济政策可能对比特币产生混合影响。与此同时，据报道，Fairshake超级政治行动委员会筹集了1.61亿美元，其中1330万美元用于反对反加密民主党人，支持亲加密民主党人和共和党人。民主党人获得了总支出的5%，而共和党人据说获得了4%。

Fairshake还向另外两个超级PAC转移了1540万美元：捍卫美国就业和保护进步。这些资金的大部分目的是支持支持加密货币的政治候选人。该报告还强调，与特朗普的潜在总统职位相比，卡玛拉·哈里斯（Kamala Harris）对比特币和其他数字资产的优势可能较小，因为她可能采取更谨慎的态度。

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

The meme coin competition is shifting from community hype to technological and ecosystem advantages. This analysis contrasts Bonk, an established token on the Solana network known for its speed and low costs, with the newer Little Pepe ($LILPEPE), currently in its presale phase. Bonk leverages its mature community and Solana's infrastructure, while Little Pepe differentiates itself with a Layer 2 Ethereum solution promising tax-free trading, staking rewards, and enhanced scalability. To drive engagement, Little Pepe is offering substantial giveaways totaling $777,000. Both coins, despite their different strategies—Bonk as a proven ecosystem and Little Pepe as an early-stage utility project—are capturing significant market attention as demand surges.

TheNewsCrypto36m ago

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

TheNewsCrypto36m ago

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

A US law enforcement task force has frozen over $700 million in cryptocurrency linked to investment scams targeting Americans. The operation, which involved cooperation from crypto exchanges and legal processes, also took down more than 500 fraudulent websites and a Telegram channel used to recruit victims. Two Chinese nationals were named in arrest warrants for operating a scam compound in Burma. In a related move, the US State Department announced a $10 million reward for information disrupting scam centers in Burma. Singaporean authorities, alongside major crypto exchanges and analytics firms, also prevented nearly $3 million in losses through a parallel operation. The scale of cybercrime remains vast, with the FBI reporting over $20 billion in losses in 2025.

bitcoinist1h ago

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

bitcoinist1h ago

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that the Toncoin (TON) network will reduce transaction fees by six times in one week, lowering the cost to just 0.00039 TON (approximately $0.0005). This fee reduction is part of the "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA) roadmap and will remain fixed regardless of network congestion. The update follows a recent upgrade that made the network 10 times faster and transactions nearly instant. Durov also hinted that future steps aim to make most transactions fully feeless. Although Telegram discontinued formal involvement with TON due to regulatory issues, Durov remains a strong supporter. Currently, Toncoin is trading around $1.30, down over 8% in the past week.

bitcoinist2h ago

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

bitcoinist2h ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2h ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets